Alexander et al v. Falk et al

Filing 64

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall strike Plaintiffs' Supplement to their Reply to Defendants' Response in Opposition to Motion for Leave to Proceed in Pseudonym (ECF No. 63 ) from the docket. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 8/30/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
RANDI ALEXANDER, et al.,
7
8
9
10
11

)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
KATHRYN FALK, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:16-cv-02268-MMD-GWF
ORDER

12

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Supplement to their Reply to Defendants’

13

Response in Opposition to Motion for Leave to Proceed in Pseudonym (ECF No. 63), filed on August

14

28, 2017.

15

Local Rule 7-2(g) states as follows:

16

Supplementation prohibited without leave of court. A party may not file
supplemental pleadings, briefs, authorities, or evidence without leave of court
granted for good cause. The judge may strike supplemental filings made without
leave of court.

17
18
19
20
21

Plaintiffs filed a supplement to their Motion to Proceed in Pseudonym without leave of court
granted for good cause. The Court, therefore, strikes Plaintiffs’ supplement. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall strike Plaintiffs’ Supplement to

22

their Reply to Defendants’ Response in Opposition to Motion for Leave to Proceed in Pseudonym (ECF

23

No. 63) from the docket.

24

DATED this 30th day of August, 2017.

25
26
27
28

______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge