Rosiere v. United States of America
Filing
33
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO DISTRICT OF NEVADA. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 9/27/2016. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2016) [Transferred from California Northern on 9/28/2016.]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
San Francisco Division
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
SHAUN ROSIERE,
Case No. 16-cv-02765-LB
Plaintiff,
13
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
v.
14
15
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Re: ECF No. 12
Defendant.
16
17
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
18
This is a Freedom of Information Act (―FOIA‖) case.1 Shaun Rosiere, proceeding pro se and
19
in forma pauperis, requested Department of Justice records relating to two criminal cases and one
20
civil case (case numbers 1:08-cr-00629, 1:09-00720, and 1:05-cv-02589).2 The documents are
21
located in Trenton, New Jersey, and Denver, Colorado.3 Although Mr. Rosiere submitted his
22
FOIA requests between March 24 and April 6, 2016, the government has not responded.4 Mr.
23
Rosiere therefore initiated this suit.5
24
25
1
26
27
28
Compl. — ECF No. 1. Record citations refer to material in the Electronic Case File (―ECF‖);
pinpoint citations are to the ECF-generated page numbers at the top of documents.
2
Id. ¶ 1, Exs. 1–6.
3
Id. Exs. 1–6.
4
Id. ¶ 2–3, Exs. 1–6.
5
See generally id.
1
The United States moves to dismiss for improper venue, or alternatively, transfer the case to a
2
proper venue.6 The court can decide the matter without oral argument, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-
3
1(b); and although Mr. Rosiere declined magistrate jurisdiction, a motion to transfer is non-
4
dispositive and thus this court can decide the issue. See Pavao v. Unifund CCR Partners, 934 F.
5
Supp. 2d 1238, 1241 n.1 (S.D. Cal. 2013) (collecting cases). The court transfers the case to the
6
District of Nevada, where Mr. Rosiere resides.
7
8
GOVERNING LAW
9
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3), a defendant may move to dismiss a case for
improper venue. If venue is improper, the court may either dismiss the case without prejudice, or,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
if it is in the ―interest of justice,‖ may transfer the case ―to any district or division in which it could
12
have been brought.‖ 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a); In re Hall, Bayoutree Assoc., Ltd., 939 F.2d 802, 804
13
(9th Cir. 1991) (any dismissal for improper venue must be without prejudice). Ordinarily, the
14
interest of justice requires transfer to the proper venue rather than dismissal. See Baeta v. Sonchik,
15
273 F.3d 1261, 1264–65 (9th Cir. 2001).
16
After a defendant challenges venue, the plaintiff has the burden to show that venue is proper.
17
See Piedmont Label Co. v. Sun Garden Packing Co., 598 F.2d 491, 496 (9th Cir. 1979); Munson v.
18
California, No. C 08-5053 SBA, 2009 WL 264838, *1 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2009). When
19
considering a Rule 12(b)(3) motion, the court need not accept as true all allegations in the
20
complaint and may consider facts outside the pleadings. See Murphy v. Schneider Nat’l, Inc., 362
21
F.3d 1133, 1137 (9th Cir. 2004). Still, the court ―is obligated to draw all reasonable inferences in
22
favor of the non-moving party and resolve all factual conflicts in favor of the non-moving party.‖
23
Id. at 1138.
24
25
26
27
28
6
Motion to Dismiss or Transfer — ECF No. 12.
2
ANALYSIS
1
Venue is generally governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1391, but FOIA has its own venue provision and
2
3
thus § 1391 does not apply. See Johnson v. Payless Drug Stores Northwest, Inc., 950 F.2d 586,
4
587-88 (9th Cir. 1991) (applying Title VII venue provision instead of section 1391); Keen v.
5
Federal Bureau of Investigation, No. C 97-2657 TEH, 1997 WL 671711, *1 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 17,
6
1991). In FOIA cases, then, venue is proper in: (1) the district where the plaintiff resides or has his
7
principal place of business; (2) the district where the records at issue are located; or (3) the District
8
of Columbia. See 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B).
Here, venue is not proper in the Northern District of California. Mr. Rosiere appears to reside
9
in Las Vegas, Nevada: he provides a Las Vegas mailing address on his court filings.7 The
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
government argues that the Northern District is not Mr. Rosiere’s business’s principal place of
12
business, and he does not provide any information to believe otherwise.8 By Mr. Rosiere’s own
13
complaint, the records he seeks are located in Colorado and New Jersey, and thus not in the
14
Northern District (or the District of Columbia).9 Mr. Rosiere requests leave to amend his
15
complaint in response to the government’s motion.10 He does not, however, provide any indication
16
that he could amend his complaint — which seeks documents only in New Jersey and Colorado —
17
to make venue proper in this district.11
In the interest of justice, instead of dismissing the case, the court transfers it to the District of
18
19
Nevada, where Mr. Rosiere resides.
*
20
*
*
21
22
23
24
25
7
26
27
28
See Compl. at 3; Notice — ECF No. 21 at 1, 2; Notice — ECF No. 24 at 1; Declination — ECF
No. 31 at 2.
8
Motion to Dismiss or Transfer at 5–6; Motion to Amend Compl. — ECF No. 28.
9
Compl., Exs. 1–6.
10
Motion to Amend Compl. — ECF No. 28.
11
See id.
3
CONCLUSION
1
2
The court transfers the case to the District of Nevada.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
Dated: September 27, 2016
5
6
______________________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
SHAUN ROSIERE,
Case No. 3:16-cv-02765-LB
Plaintiff,
8
v.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
9
10
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
14
15
16
17
18
That on September 27, 2016, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by
placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
19
20
21
Shaun Rosiere
7380 S. Eastern Ave.
Ste #124265
Las Vegas, NV 89123
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dated: September 27, 2016
Susan Y. Soong
Clerk, United States District Court
By:________________________
Lashanda Scott, Deputy Clerk to the
Honorable LAUREL BEELER
28
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?