Hakimi v. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing

Filing 4

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 3 Judge Hoffman's report and recommendation is accepted. The plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/1/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 IMAN HAKIMI, 5 6 7 Case No. 2:16-cv-02303-APG-CWH Plaintiff, v. SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING, 8 Defendant. ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DKT. NO. 3) 9 10 On January 5, 2017, Magistrate Judge Hoffman entered a report and recommendation that 11 I dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice because the plaintiff appears to have 12 abandoned the case. ECF No. 3. Plaintiff Iman Hakimi did not file an objection. Thus, I am not 13 obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) 14 (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or 15 specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 16 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s 17 findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in 18 original)). 19 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judge Hoffman’s report and recommendation (ECF 20 No. 3) is accepted. The plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court 21 is instructed to close this case. 22 DATED this 1st day of February, 2017. 23 24 25 26 27 28 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?