Hakimi v. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Filing
4
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 3 Judge Hoffman's report and recommendation is accepted. The plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/1/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
IMAN HAKIMI,
5
6
7
Case No. 2:16-cv-02303-APG-CWH
Plaintiff,
v.
SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING,
8
Defendant.
ORDER ON REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
(DKT. NO. 3)
9
10
On January 5, 2017, Magistrate Judge Hoffman entered a report and recommendation that
11
I dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice because the plaintiff appears to have
12
abandoned the case. ECF No. 3. Plaintiff Iman Hakimi did not file an objection. Thus, I am not
13
obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)
14
(requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or
15
specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d
16
1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s
17
findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in
18
original)).
19
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judge Hoffman’s report and recommendation (ECF
20
No. 3) is accepted. The plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court
21
is instructed to close this case.
22
DATED this 1st day of February, 2017.
23
24
25
26
27
28
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?