Ponder v. Wild

Filing 13

ORDER Granting 12 Stipulation to Extend Deadline re 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Forum Non Conveniens. (Replies due by 3/24/2017.) Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/17/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-02305-JCM-PAL Document 12 Filed 03/15/17 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 AARON R. MAURICE,ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 006412 BRITTANY WOOD,ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 007562 RYAN T. GORMLEY,ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 013494 KOLESAR & LEATHAM 400 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Telephone: (702) 362-7800 Facsimile: (702) 362-9472 E-Mail: amaurice@klnevada.com bwood@klnevada.com rgormley@klnevada.com 8 9 Attorneys for Defendant, Dr. Hans-Peter Wild 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA *X* MICHAEL H. PONDER,an individual, CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-02305-JCM-PAL Plaintiff, vs. DR. HANS-PETER WILD,an individual, Defendant. 17 18 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION AND FORUM NON CONVENIENS FIRST REOUEST1 ( 19 Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, 6-2, and LR 7-1, Defendant, Dr. Hans-Peter Wild, by and through 2 0 his attorneys, the law firm of Kolesar & Leatham, and Plaintiff Michael H. Ponder, by and 21 through his attorneys, the law firm of Holley Driggs Walch Fine Wray Puzey & Thompson, 22 stipulate to extend the deadline for Defendant's Reply in Support of the Motion to Dismiss for 23 Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Forum Non Conveniens ("Reply") to March 24, 2017. 24 Defendant filed the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Forum Non 25 Conveniens ("Motion") on February 21, 2017. See ECF No. 9. Plaintiff filed an opposition to 26 the Motion on March 10, 2017. See ECF No. 11. Defendant's Reply is currently due by March 27 17, 2017. Defendant and Plaintiff stipulate to extend the deadline for Defendant's Reply to 28 2342776 (9871-2) Page 1 of 3 Case 2:16-cv-02305-JCM-PAL Document 12 Filed 03/15/17 Page 2 of 3 1 March 24, 2017 in order to alleviate the time constraints created by prior professional 2 commitments taking place the week of March 13, 2017, including an all-day mediation. This is 3 the first stipulation for extension oftime to file the Reply. 4 DATED this WiA day of March,2017. DATED this 5 KOLESAR & LEATHAM HOLLEY DRIGGS WALCH FINE WRAY PUZEY & THOMPSON By ;, -~-t~c. AARON R. MAURICE,ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 006412 BRITTANY WOOD,ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 007562 RYAN T. GORMLEY,ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 013494 400 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 By 6 7 8 9 10 (•11 O O 11 (.1 12 O < Li notMarch,2017. DONNA DI AG Nevada Bar No. 009794 400 South Fourth Street, Third Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Attorney for Plaintiff, Michael H. Ponder 13 Attorneys for Defendant, Dr. Hans-Peter Wild C.4 14 0 .zo 23 E N • O (2' • 8 N 15 CE 16 ORDER 17 IT IS SO ORDERED: 18 March 17, 2017. DATED this day of , 2017. 19 2 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 21 22 23 2 4 25 26 27 28 2342776 (9871-2) Page 2 of 3 Case 2:16-cv-02305-JCM-PAL Document 12 Filed 03/15/17 Page 3 of 3 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 Pursuant to FRCP 5, LR IC4-1, nd LR 5-1, I hereby certify that I am an employee of 3 Kolesar & Leatham, and that on thei g day of March 2017, I caused to be served a true and 4 correct copy of the foregoing STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE 5 DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS 6 FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION AND FORUM NON CONVENIENS 7 ( FIRST REQUEST)in Case No. 2:16-cv-02305-JCM-PAL in the following manner: 8 The Court's Electronic Filing System to all parties on the current service list: 9 Donna DiMaggio, Esq. Holley Driggs Walch Fine Wray Puzey & Thompson 400 S. Fourth Street, Third Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 10 11 Attorneyfor Plaintiff 12 An E 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2 6 27 28 2342776 (9871-2) Page 3 of 3 oyee of OLESAR & LEATHAM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?