Bank of America, N.A., v. Solera at Stallion Mountain Unit Owners' Association et al

Filing 65

ORDER that a preclusion order is entered precluding Bank of America from using any documents, evidence or information not timely disclosed, or from calling a witness to supply testimony on information or documents not disclosed, in motion practice, at a hearing or at trial. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 8/30/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
    1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., 8 9 v. Case No. 2:16-cv-02339-JCM-PAL Plaintiff, 10 SOLERA AT STALLION MOUNTAIN UNIT OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, et al., 11 ORDER Defendants. 12 The court conducted a hearing on August 8, 2017, on the parties’ Motion for Protective 13 Order (ECF No. 53). Darren Brenner was present on behalf of plaintiff, and Diana Cline Ebron 14 was present on behalf of defendant. 15 After reviewing the moving and responsive papers and hearing the arguments of counsel 16 at the hearing the court granted Bank of America’s motion for protective order (ECF No 53) 17 regarding a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice. The court limited the scope of examination as the 18 motion for protective order requested to issues pertaining to the Bank’s tender of the HOA super- 19 priority lien in light of the Ninth’s Circuit’s decision in Bourne Valley Tr. v. BANA, N.A., 832 F. 20 3d 1154 (9th Cir. 2016), which is binding on this court. SFR opposed the motion for protective 21 order arguing that banks in other HOA foreclosure cases have provided testimony at trial based on 22 documents not produced in discovery, and on subjects on which the banks have prevented or 23 limited cross-examination of bank Rule 30(b)(6) designees. The court expressly stated that 24 although the court was granting the motion for protective order in light of Bourne Valley that, 25 having successfully resisted SFR’s discovery on the noticed topics, the Bank would be precluded 26 from using any documents, evidence or testimony not timely disclosed in discovery in motion 27 practice, at hearing or at trial. 28 1     1 IT IS ORDERED that a preclusion order is entered precluding Bank of America from 2 using any documents, evidence or information not timely disclosed, or from calling a witness to 3 supply testimony on information or documents not disclosed, in motion practice, at a hearing or at 4 trial. 5 DATED this 30th day of August, 2017. 6 7 PEGGY A. LEEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?