Bank of America, N.A., v. Solera at Stallion Mountain Unit Owners' Association et al
Filing
65
ORDER that a preclusion order is entered precluding Bank of America from using any documents, evidence or information not timely disclosed, or from calling a witness to supply testimony on information or documents not disclosed, in motion practice, at a hearing or at trial. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 8/30/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
8
9
v.
Case No. 2:16-cv-02339-JCM-PAL
Plaintiff,
10
SOLERA AT STALLION MOUNTAIN
UNIT OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, et al.,
11
ORDER
Defendants.
12
The court conducted a hearing on August 8, 2017, on the parties’ Motion for Protective
13
Order (ECF No. 53). Darren Brenner was present on behalf of plaintiff, and Diana Cline Ebron
14
was present on behalf of defendant.
15
After reviewing the moving and responsive papers and hearing the arguments of counsel
16
at the hearing the court granted Bank of America’s motion for protective order (ECF No 53)
17
regarding a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice. The court limited the scope of examination as the
18
motion for protective order requested to issues pertaining to the Bank’s tender of the HOA super-
19
priority lien in light of the Ninth’s Circuit’s decision in Bourne Valley Tr. v. BANA, N.A., 832 F.
20
3d 1154 (9th Cir. 2016), which is binding on this court. SFR opposed the motion for protective
21
order arguing that banks in other HOA foreclosure cases have provided testimony at trial based on
22
documents not produced in discovery, and on subjects on which the banks have prevented or
23
limited cross-examination of bank Rule 30(b)(6) designees. The court expressly stated that
24
although the court was granting the motion for protective order in light of Bourne Valley that,
25
having successfully resisted SFR’s discovery on the noticed topics, the Bank would be precluded
26
from using any documents, evidence or testimony not timely disclosed in discovery in motion
27
practice, at hearing or at trial.
28
1
1
IT IS ORDERED that a preclusion order is entered precluding Bank of America from
2
using any documents, evidence or information not timely disclosed, or from calling a witness to
3
supply testimony on information or documents not disclosed, in motion practice, at a hearing or at
4
trial.
5
DATED this 30th day of August, 2017.
6
7
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?