MGM Grand Hotel, LLC v. Shin et al

Filing 58

ORDER GRANTING Motion for Reconsideration and Extension of Time 53 . The Order granting the Motion to Dismiss 52 is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that MGM's belated opposition to CIBC's Motion to Dismiss 51 is deemed timely; C IBC has until March 29, 2017, to file its reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss 45 . The Clerk of Court is directed to reinstate the Motion to Dismiss at ECF No. 45. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/22/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 MGM Grand Hotel, LLC, 5 2:16-cv-02347-JAD-NJK Plaintiff Order Granting Motion for Reconsideration 6 v. 7 Kyung Shin aka Kyung S. Shin, et al., 8 [ECF No. 53] Defendants 9 10 MGM Grand Hotel, LLC brings this suit to recover its losses caused when defendant 11 Kyung Shin used a fraudulently issued bank draft for gaming credit and other benefits. In its 12 amended complaint against Shin and the issuing financial institutions Canadian Imperial Bank of 13 Commerce and CIBC Securities, Inc. (collectively, “CIBC”), MGM prays for punitive damages 14 against all defendants.1 CIBC moved to dismiss this punitive damages “claim” against it, arguing 15 that the amended complaint lacks facts to support such an award.2 When MGM failed to file a 16 timely opposition, I granted the motion to dismiss under Local Rule 7-2(d).3 MGM filed its 17 opposition the following day and now moves to vacate my order granting the motion to permit its 18 belated opposition to be considered on its merits.4 I find that MGM has demonstrated excusable neglect and good cause to grant the 19 20 extension and request for reconsideration. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that MGM’s Motion for Reconsideration and Extension of 21 22 Time [ECF No. 53] is GRANTED and the Order Granting the Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 52] 23 24 1 ECF No. 33. 2 ECF No. 45. 3 Nev. L.R. 7-2(d). 4 ECF No. 53 25 26 27 28 1 2 is VACATED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that MGM’s belated opposition to CIBC’s Motion to 3 Dismiss [ECF No. 51] is deemed timely; CIBC has until March 29, 2017, to file its reply in 4 support of the Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 45]. The Clerk of Court is directed to reinstate 5 the Motion to Dismiss at ECF No. 45. 6 DATED: March 22, 2017 7 _______________________________ Jennifer A. Dorsey United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?