Perez v. Wellfleet Communications

Filing 31

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 22 Defendants' Motion to Enforce LR IA 11-3 and to Strike All Documents Filed in this Action by Plaintiff is granted, in part, and denied, in part. Defendants' request to enforce LR IA 11-3 is grant ed. However, Defendants' request to strike all documents filed by Plaintiff is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 23 Defendants' Motion to Quash Subpoena isdenied. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 4/5/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
7
8
9
10
11

EDWARD C. HUGHLER,

)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
WELLFLEET COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, et al., )
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:16-CV-02353-GMN-GWF
ORDER

12
13

This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Enforce LR IA 11-3 and to Strike

14

All Documents Filed in this Action by Plaintiff (ECF No. 22) and Defendants’ Motion to Quash

15

Subpoena (ECF No. 23), filed on March 31, 2017.

16

On April 3, 2017, the Court ordered counsel for Plaintiff to file a motion with the Court

17

requesting that they be allowed to practice in this district pursuant to Local Rule IA 11-3. Plaintiff’s

18

counsel has since filed said motion and it has been granted by the Court. See Order (ECF No. 30).

19

Therefore, the issues raised in Defendants’ motions are now moot. Accordingly,

20

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Enforce LR IA 11-3 and to Strike

21

All Documents Filed in this Action by Plaintiff (ECF No. 22) is granted, in part, and denied, in part.

22

Defendants’ request to enforce LR IA 11-3 is granted. However, Defendants’ request to strike all

23

documents filed by Plaintiff is denied.

24
25
26

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Quash Subpoena (ECF No. 23) is
denied.
DATED this 5th day of April, 2017.

27
28

______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge