Bally Gaming, Inc. v. Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 47

ORDER Granting 46 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/4/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-02359-JCM-CWH Document 46 Filed 05/03/17 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 J. Randall Jones (Nev. Bar No. 1927) r.jones@kempjones.com Spencer H. Gunnerson (Nev. Bar No. 8810) s.gunnerson@kempjones.com KEMP, JONES & COULTHARD, LLP 3800 Howard Hughes Pkwy, 17th Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Telephone: (702) 385-6000 Timothy C. Meece (admitted pro hac vice) tmeece@bannerwitcoff.com Michael J. Harris (admitted pro hac vice) mharris@bannerwitcoff.com Audra C. Eidem Heinze (admitted pro hac vice) aheinze@bannerwitcoff.com BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD. Ten South Wacker Drive, Suite 3000 Chicago, Illinois 60606-7407 Telephone: (312) 463-5000 Attorneys for Plaintiff Bally Gaming, Inc. 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 16 * * * 17 18 BALLY GAMING, INC. Plaintiff, v. 19 20 21 22 Case No.: 2-16-cv-02359-JCM-CWH JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., VIDEO GAMING TECHNOLOGIES, INC., AND ARISTOCRAT LEISURE LIMITED Defendants. 23 24 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), Plaintiff Bally Gaming, Inc. 25 (“Bally”) and Defendants Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. (“ATI”), Video Gaming Technologies, 26 Inc. (“VGT”), and Aristocrat Leisure Limited (“ALL”) (ATI, VGT, and ALL collectively, 27 “Aristocrat”) (Bally and Aristocrat collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective 1 Case 2:16-cv-02359-JCM-CWH Document 46 Filed 05/03/17 Page 2 of 3 1 counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 2 1. Bally filed a Complaint in this matter on October 10, 2016. ECF No. 1. 3 2. VGT filed an Answer on January 4, 2017. ECF No. 26. ATI and ALL filed Motions to Dismiss on December 5, 2016. ECF Nos. 21, 22. 3. The Parties have reached a settlement of all disputes in this case (the “Settlement Agreement”). As part of the Settlement Agreement, the Parties have agreed to dismiss all claims in this case with prejudice. 4 5 6 WHEREFORE, pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the Parties respectfully request 7 8 that the Court approve this stipulation and order as follows: (1) all claims asserted by the Parties 9 in any pleading in this action are dismissed with prejudice; (2) no Party shall be deemed a 10 “prevailing party” within the meaning of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54 or Local Rule 54-1; 11 /// 12 /// 13 /// 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2 Case 2:16-cv-02359-JCM-CWH Document 46 Filed 05/03/17 Page 3 of 3 1 (3) each Party shall bear its own costs, disbursements and attorneys’ fees; and (4) this Court shall 2 retain exclusive jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement Agreement and this Order of Dismissal. 3 4 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 3rd day of May, 2017. For Plaintiff Bally Gaming, Inc. For Defendants Aristocrat Technologies, Inc., Video Gaming Technologies, Inc. and Aristocrat Leisure Limited: /s/ Spencer H. Gunnerson J. RANDALL JONES (#1927) SPENCER H. GUNNERSON (#8810) KEMP, JONES & COULTHARD, LLP 3800 Howard Hughes Pkwy, 17th Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Tel: (702) 385-6000 /s/ Nicholas J. Santoro NICHOLAS J. SANTORO (#532) SANTORO WHITMIRE, LTD. 10100 W. Charleston Blvd., Suite 250 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 Tel: (702) 948-8771 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ROBERT T. HASLAM COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Tel: (650) 632-4700 TIMOTHY C. MEECE MICHAEL J. HARRIS AUDRA C. EIDEM HEINZE BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD. Ten South Wacker Drive, Suite 3000 Chicago, Illinois 60606-7407 Tel: (312) 463-5000 GARY M. RUBMAN PETER A. SWANSON COVINGTON & BURLING LLP One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 Tel: (202) 662-6000 15 16 17 18 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED: 21 ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 22 23 24 May 4, 2017 DATED: _______________ 25 26 27 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?