Ruiz-Camacho v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Filing 42

ORDER Granting 41 Fifth Stipulation to Extend the Close of Discovery Deadline. Discovery due by 7/2/2018. If dispositive motions are filed, the deadline for filing the joint pretrial order will be suspended until 30 days after decision on the dispositive motions or further court order. No further extensions will be granted absent exceptional circumstances. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 4/13/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 STOVALL & ASSOCIATES LESLIE MARK STOVALL, ESQ. 2 Nevada Bar No. 2566 ROSS H. MOYNIHAN, ESQ. 3 Nevada Bar No. 11848 2301 Palomino Lane 4 Las Vegas, NV 89107 (702) 258-3034 5 Attorneys for plaintiff 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 EVA RUIZ-CAMACHO, 8 9 10 11 12 ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION; ) DOES I-X, inclusive, and ROE CORPORATIONS ) I-X, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No.: 2:16-cv-02374 13 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE CLOSE OF DISCOVER DEADLINE 14 Pursuant to LR 26-4, and for reasons provided below, the parties, by and through their 15 respective counsel request that the court extend the close of discovery date by 60 days so that the 16 parties can complete discovery and ready this case for trial. This is the fifth such request for an 17 extension of time. 18 I. 19 STATEMENT SPECIFYING DISCOVERY COMPLETED 20 1. The parties have made their initial disclosures of witnesses and documents and 21 multiple supplements thereto. 22 2. The parties have engaged in numerous sets of written discovery. 3. The parties have made initial and rebuttal expert disclosures. 4. Following a discovery dispute, the parties’ request for guidance on the dispute from 23 24 25 the court, and the court’s ruling on the matter (see ECF No. 32, dated January 9, 26 2018), the plaintiff provided the defendant with the following executed 27 28 1 1 authorizations: 2 a. Tax Form 4506; 3 b. Medicaid authorization; 4 c. Medicare authorization; 5 d. Sierra Health HMO authorization; 6 e. Health Plan of Nevada authorization; 7 f. James Dettling, M.D. authorization; 8 g. Spinal Rehabilitation Center; and 9 h. Social Security Administration. 10 Defendant has requested documents from the above referenced entities and medical 11 providers but has not yet received all of the documents requested. 12 5. 13 Defendant has taken the first part of plaintiff’s deposition and will complete her deposition on April 19, 2018. 14 II. 15 DESCRIPTION OF THE DISCOVERY THAT REMAINS TO BE COMPLETED 16 1. 17 18 above recently executed authorizations. 2. 19 20 Defendant must obtain and disclose the remainder of the documents related to the Supplementation of medical expert reporting with the new documents related to the authorizations. 3. 21 Supplementation of medical expert reporting with the new documents related to the authorizations. 22 4. Depositions of experts. 23 5. Plaintiff’s supplementation of liability expert reporting with documents provided by 24 the defendant after the initial expert disclosures date. 25 6. Plaintiff's deposition of defendant's Rule 30(b)(6) witness. 26 7. Additional written and deposition discovery as may be needed. 27 28 2 1 III. 2 REASONS WHY THE REMAINING DISCOVERY WAS NOT COMPLETED WITHIN 3 THE TIME LIMITS SET BY THE DISCOVERY PLAN 4 The parties had a dispute towards the end of 2017 regarding record authorizations that 5 defendant argued were needed to adequately assess the plaintiff’s medical and wage loss-related 6 claims. This resulted in the parties agreement to make a written request for guidance to the court. 7 The court ruled that the defendant was entitled to the authorization by its order dated January 9, 8 2018 (ECF No. 32). Plaintiff provided executed authorizations to defendant and defendant requested 9 the records. As the court anticipated during the December 20, 2017 hearing on the matter, defendant 10 has not yet received all of the records and requires additional time to do so. The reason for the delay 11 is that the requests are being made to private health insurers and governmental entities. Defendant 12 anticipates receiving all of the records within the next few weeks and upon their receipt and 13 disclosure, the parties will be supplementing their medical expert reporting and taking medical 14 expert depositions, which the parties are currently scheduling. 15 Furthermore, the plaintiff’s liability expert is in the process supplementing his reporting with 16 documents disclosed by the defendant after the initial expert disclosure date. In addition, plaintiff 17 will be taking the deposition of the defendant’s Rule 30 (b)(6)witness which the parties agree should 18 be taken during the requested 60 day discovery extension due to current scheduling issues. 19 / / / 20 / / / 21 / / / 22 / / / 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 28 3 1 IV. 2 PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETING REMAINING DISCOVERY 3 The current close of discovery date is May 1, 2018. The parties stipulate and request that the 4 court order a 60 day extension of this date to July 2, 2018. The proposed remaining dates, therefore 5 would be as follows: 6 1. 7 2. Dispositive motion deadline: Joint Pretrial Order: September 4, 2018. 8 Close of Discovery: July 2, 2018 9 DATED this 11th day of April, 2018. August 1, 2018 DATED this 11th day of April, 2018. 10 STOVALL & ASSOCIATES WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DICKER, LLP 11 /s/ Ross Moynihan 12 ____________________________ LESLIE MARK STOVALL, ESQ. 13 Nevada Bar No. 2566 ROSS H. MOYNIHAN, ESQ. 14 Nevada Bar No. 11848 2301 Palomino Lane 15 Las Vegas, Nevada 89107 Attorney for Plaintiff 16 /s/ Christopher Phipps ____________________________ CHRISTOPHER PHIPPS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 3788 300 South Fourth Street, 11th Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Attorneys for Defendant 17 ORDER 18 The discovery schedule proposed above, specifically the extension of the close of discovery 19 deadline by 60 days from May 1, 2018 to July 2, 2018, is now ordered. 20 13th Dated this _____ day of April, 2018. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ______________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE If dispositive motions are filed, the deadline for filing the joint pretrial order will be suspended until 30 days after decision on the dispositive motions or further court order. No further extensions will be granted absent exceptional circumstances. IT IS SO ORDERED. 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?