Deans v. Las Vegas Clark County et al
Filing
58
ORDER Granting 57 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 51 Motion for Summary Judgment (Third Request). Replies due by 12/14/2017. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 12/6/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
Case 2:16-cv-02405-APG-PAL Document 57 Filed 12/05/17 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Marc J. Randazza, NV Bar # 12265
D. Gill Sperlein, pro hac vice
Alex J. Shepard, NV Bar # 13582
RANDAZZA LEGAL GROUP, PLLC
4035 S. El Capitan Way
Las Vegas, NV 89147
Telephone: 702-420-2001
Facsimile: 305-437-7662
ecf@randazza.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
William Deans
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
WILLIAM DEANS, an individual,
Plaintiff,
10
11
12
13
vs.
LAS VEGAS CLARK COUNTY LIBRARY
DISTRICT;
Defendant.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Case No. 2:16-cv-02405-APG-PAL
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(Third Request)
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, LR IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, and LR 7-1 Defendant Las VegasClark County Library District (“Library District”) and Plaintiff William Deans (“Deans”)
(jointly, the “Parties”) by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1.
On October 10, 2017, Deans filed its Plaintiff William Deans’s Motion for
Summary Judgment (“Motion”) [ECF No. 51].
2.
On October 30, 2017, the Court granted the Parties Stipulation and Order to
Extend Briefing Schedule on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 53], due to a
medical issue for Kelly Stout, Defendants’ counsel.
3.
Pursuant to the October 30, 2017 Order, the Library District’s time to file its
opposition to the Motion was extended from October 31, 2017 until November 29, 2017.
4.
Because Ms. Stout’s ongoing care and treatment necessitated a medical
appointment for the afternoon of November 29, 2017, the Parties agreed that Library District’s
-1Stipulation and Order to Extend Briefing Schedule on Motion for Summary Judgment
2:16-cv-02405-APG-PAL
Case 2:16-cv-02405-APG-PAL Document 57 Filed 12/05/17 Page 2 of 2
1
time to file its opposition to the Motion should be extended one day, from November 29, 2017
2
until November 30, 2017.
3
5.
The Court ratified the Parties’ second stipulation on November 29, 2017 [ECF
4
No. 55], and the Library District filed its Response to Plaintiff’s Motion on November 30, 2017.
5
[ECF No. 56].
6
6.
Counsel for Plaintiffs require additional time to fully brief their Reply in Support
7
of Plaintiff’s Motion. In addition to preparing a Reply in this case, Plaintiff’s counsel is
8
burdened with concurrently preparing filings in a number of other cases. The Parties agree to
9
extend the date by which Plaintiff may file his Reply by one week, from December 7, 2017 until
10
December 14, 2017.
11
12
Dated: December 5, 2017.
13
Respectfully submitted,
Respectfully submitted,
14
/s/ Alex J. Shepard
Marc J. Randazza (NV Bar # 12265)
D. Gill Sperlein, pro hac vice
Alex J. Shepard (NV Bar # 13582)
RANDAZZA LEGAL GROUP, PLLC
4035 S. El Capitan Way
Las Vegas, NV 89147
Telephone: 702-420-2001
Facsimile: 305-437-7662
ecf@randazza.com
/s/ Kelly B. Stout
Dennis L. Kennedy
Kelly B. Stout
BAILEY KENNEDY, LLP
8984 Spanish Ridge Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148
Telephone: (702) 562-8820
Facsimile: (702) 562-8821
DKennedy@BaileyKennedy.com
KStout@BaileyKennedy.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
William Deans
Attorneys for Defendants
Las Vegas-Clark County Library District
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
26
12/6/2017
Dated: __________________
27
-2Stipulation and Order to Extend Briefing Schedule on Motion for Summary Judgment
2:16-cv-02405-APG-PAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?