Deans v. Las Vegas Clark County et al

Filing 58

ORDER Granting 57 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 51 Motion for Summary Judgment (Third Request). Replies due by 12/14/2017. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 12/6/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-02405-APG-PAL Document 57 Filed 12/05/17 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Marc J. Randazza, NV Bar # 12265 D. Gill Sperlein, pro hac vice Alex J. Shepard, NV Bar # 13582 RANDAZZA LEGAL GROUP, PLLC 4035 S. El Capitan Way Las Vegas, NV 89147 Telephone: 702-420-2001 Facsimile: 305-437-7662 ecf@randazza.com Attorneys for Plaintiff, William Deans UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 WILLIAM DEANS, an individual, Plaintiff, 10 11 12 13 vs. LAS VEGAS CLARK COUNTY LIBRARY DISTRICT; Defendant. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Case No. 2:16-cv-02405-APG-PAL STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Third Request) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, LR IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, and LR 7-1 Defendant Las VegasClark County Library District (“Library District”) and Plaintiff William Deans (“Deans”) (jointly, the “Parties”) by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. On October 10, 2017, Deans filed its Plaintiff William Deans’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”) [ECF No. 51]. 2. On October 30, 2017, the Court granted the Parties Stipulation and Order to Extend Briefing Schedule on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 53], due to a medical issue for Kelly Stout, Defendants’ counsel. 3. Pursuant to the October 30, 2017 Order, the Library District’s time to file its opposition to the Motion was extended from October 31, 2017 until November 29, 2017. 4. Because Ms. Stout’s ongoing care and treatment necessitated a medical appointment for the afternoon of November 29, 2017, the Parties agreed that Library District’s -1Stipulation and Order to Extend Briefing Schedule on Motion for Summary Judgment 2:16-cv-02405-APG-PAL Case 2:16-cv-02405-APG-PAL Document 57 Filed 12/05/17 Page 2 of 2 1 time to file its opposition to the Motion should be extended one day, from November 29, 2017 2 until November 30, 2017. 3 5. The Court ratified the Parties’ second stipulation on November 29, 2017 [ECF 4 No. 55], and the Library District filed its Response to Plaintiff’s Motion on November 30, 2017. 5 [ECF No. 56]. 6 6. Counsel for Plaintiffs require additional time to fully brief their Reply in Support 7 of Plaintiff’s Motion. In addition to preparing a Reply in this case, Plaintiff’s counsel is 8 burdened with concurrently preparing filings in a number of other cases. The Parties agree to 9 extend the date by which Plaintiff may file his Reply by one week, from December 7, 2017 until 10 December 14, 2017. 11 12 Dated: December 5, 2017. 13 Respectfully submitted, Respectfully submitted, 14 /s/ Alex J. Shepard Marc J. Randazza (NV Bar # 12265) D. Gill Sperlein, pro hac vice Alex J. Shepard (NV Bar # 13582) RANDAZZA LEGAL GROUP, PLLC 4035 S. El Capitan Way Las Vegas, NV 89147 Telephone: 702-420-2001 Facsimile: 305-437-7662 ecf@randazza.com /s/ Kelly B. Stout Dennis L. Kennedy Kelly B. Stout BAILEY KENNEDY, LLP 8984 Spanish Ridge Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89148 Telephone: (702) 562-8820 Facsimile: (702) 562-8821 DKennedy@BaileyKennedy.com KStout@BaileyKennedy.com Attorneys for Plaintiff William Deans Attorneys for Defendants Las Vegas-Clark County Library District 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26 12/6/2017 Dated: __________________ 27 -2Stipulation and Order to Extend Briefing Schedule on Motion for Summary Judgment 2:16-cv-02405-APG-PAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?