Garganese v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
Filing
19
ORDER Granting 18 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/6/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Case 2:16-cv-02408-JCM-CWH Document 18 Filed 06/28/17 Page 1 of 2
1
2
RILEY A. CLAYTON
Nevada Bar No. 005260
rclayton@lawhjc.com
3
HALL JAFFE & CLAYTON, LLP
4
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89128
5
FAX (702)316-4114
7425 PEAK DRIVE
(702) 316-4111
6
Attorney for Defendant,
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
SABRINA GARGANESE,
11
Case No.: 2:16-cv-02408-JCM-CWH
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
STATE FARM AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE
COMPANY; and DOES I through X, and ROE
Corporations I through X, inclusive,
14
15
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Defendants.
16
17
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Plaintiff, Sabrina Garganese, and Defendant,
18
19
20
21
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company dba State Farm, parties hereto, by and through their
respective counsel, Vannah & Vannah, for Plaintiff, and Hall Jaffe & Clayton, LLP, for Defendant,
///
22
23
///
24
25
///
26
27
28
///
Case 2:16-cv-02408-JCM-CWH Document 18 Filed 06/28/17 Page 2 of 2
1
that this matter be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorney fees.
2
3
DATED this 28th day of June, 2017.
DATED this 28th day of June, 2017.
4
HALL JAFFE & CLAYTON, LLP
VANNAH & VANNAH
By: Riley A. Clayton, Esq.
Riley A. Clayton, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 005260
7425 Peak Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89128
Attorney for Defendant
By: Tamara Vannah, Esq.
Tamara Vannah, Esq.
Nevada Bar No.
400 So. Seventh Street, Fourth Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Attorney for Plaintiff
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
ORDER
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED:
14
15
Dated July______ day of
this 6, 2017.
, 2017.
16
17
_______________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?