Westwood v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
Filing
26
ORDER that 22 Motion to Compel Discovery is denied, without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 5/17/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
GIOVANNA WESTWOOD,
6
7
8
9
10
11
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
)
)
Defendant.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:16-cv-02409-RFB-GWF
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery (ECF No. 22),
12
filed on May 8, 2017. Plaintiff requests an order compelling Defendant to respond to written
13
discovery including interrogatories and requests for production of documents that Plaintiff served
14
upon Defendant on April 6, 2017. Plaintiff represents that Defendant has not responded.
15
Plaintiff has filed this motion without an attempt to resolve these issues with Defendant’s
16
counsel. The meet and confer requirements in Rule 37(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
17
and Local Rule (“LR”) 26-7(b) require the moving party to confer or attempt to confer in person, or
18
at least by telephone, with the opposing party in a good faith effort to resolve the discovery dispute
19
prior to filing a motion to compel. Shuffle Master v. Progressive Games, 170 F.R.D. 166, 171
20
(D.Nev. 1996); Walker v. North Las Vegas Police Depart., 2016 WL 427063, *2 (D.Nev. Feb. 3,
21
2016). The moving party is also required to include a certification setting forth its efforts and the
22
results of the meet and confer attempts. Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(1); LR 26-7(c). Because Plaintiff’s
23
motion fails to show that she complied with these requirements prior to filing the motion,
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery (ECF No. 22) is
denied, without prejudice.
DATED this 17th day of May, 2017.
______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?