Bullocks Jr v. City of North Las Vegas
Filing
10
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 9 the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is ADOPTED. This case is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 2/9/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
Leon Bullocks, Jr.,
2:16-cv-02478-JAD-NJK
5
Plaintiff
6
v.
7
North Las Vegas Police Department,
8
Order Adopting Report and
Recommendation and Dismissing and
Closing Case
Defendant
[ECF No. 9]
9
10
On November 15, 2016, the magistrate judge granted Bullocks’s application to proceed in
11
forma pauperis, screened his complaint, and dismissed Bullocks’s claims without prejudice and with
12
leave to amend.1 The magistrate judge has now screened Bullocks’s amended complaint and she
13
recommends that I dismiss this case because the amended complaint suffers from the same defects as
14
the initial complaint.2
15
“[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless
16
objections are filed.”3 Objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation were due by
17
January 20, 2017, and Bullocks has not filed an objection or requested an extension to do so.
18
19
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the magistrate
judge’s report and recommendation [ECF No. 9] is ADOPTED. This case is DISMISSED.
20
The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.
21
Dated this 9th day of February, 2017.
22
_________________________________
______________________
_ _
_
_ _
Jennifer A. Dorsey
nnifer .
i
United States District Judge
nited States
d tat
ct ud
ct Judge
23
24
25
26
27
1
ECF No. 4.
2
ECF No. 9.
28
3
Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474
U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?