Board of Trustees of Unite Here Health v. Aguilar et al

Filing 142

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 140 Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Leave to Amend Exhibit 1 to Complaint is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 6/6/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNITE HERE HEALTH, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) NORA A. AGUILAR, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:16-cv-02501-RFB-GWF ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion for Leave to Amend Exhibit 1 to Complaint (ECF No. 140), filed on June 1, 2017. This matter arises from allegations of fraud, fraudulent misrepresentation, fraudulent 16 concealment, negligent misrepresentation, conversion, unjust enrichment, and restitution. See 17 Complaint (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff requests leave to amend Exhibit 1 to its complaint pursuant to Rule 18 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to reflect updated claim amounts that were calculated 19 incorrectly. Plaintiff represents that the amendment will update 45 lines of listed claim amounts to 20 reflect a lesser amount. 21 Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2), prior to trial, a party “may amend its pleading only with the 22 opposing party’s written consent or the court’s leave.” Courts should freely give leave to amend 23 “when justice so requires.” Id. As this Court has previously stated “Rule 15’s policy of favoring 24 amendments to pleadings should be applied with ‘extreme liberality’” where the motion to amend “is 25 not sought in bad faith, does not cause the opposing party undue delay, does not cause the opposing 26 party undue prejudice, and does not constitute an exercise in futility.” Wright v. Incline Village 27 General Imp. Dist., 597 F.Supp.2d 1191, 1210 (D.Nev. 2009). The Court finds justice requires that 28 Plaintiff be granted leave to amend its Complaint as leave to amend is sought in good faith, does not 1 cause the opposing party undue delay or undue prejudice, and does not constitute an exercise in 2 futility. Accordingly, 3 4 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion for Leave to Amend Exhibit 1 to Complaint (ECF No. 140) is granted. DATED this 6th day of June, 2017. 6 7 8 ______________________________________ GEORGE FOLEY, JR. United States Magistrate Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?