Board of Trustees of Unite Here Health v. Aguilar et al
Filing
548
ORDER Denying without prejudice 537 Motion for Writ of Execution. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 538 the MOTION for Judgment by Confession is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 539 the MOTION for Judgment by Confession is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 540 the MOTION for Judgment by Confession is DENIED as moot, as Plaintiff withdrew the motion. See ECF No. 542 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 541 MOTION for Judgment by Confession is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 9/25/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
Case 2:16-cv-02501-RFB-GWF Document 548 Filed 09/25/23 Page 1 of 7
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
8
9
10
11
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNITE HERE
HEALTH,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER
v.
NORA A. AGUILAR, et al.,
Defendants.
12
13
Case No. 2:16-cv-02501-RFB-GWF
I.
INTRODUCTION
Before the Court are five motions: Plaintiff Board of Trustees of Unite Here Health’s
Motion for Writ of Execution Myesha Johnson (ECF No. 537) and four Motions for Judgment by
Confession (ECF Nos. 538, 539, 540, 541).
For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants the motions.
II.
MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT BY CONFESSION
a. Legal Standard
As an initial matter, because the operative complaint invokes federal question jurisdiction
pursuant to § 502(e)(1) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) of 1974, 29
U.S.C. §1132(e)(1) the instant judgment by confessions are based on federal law and “federal law
controls with respect to both substance and procedure.” Retail Clerks Union Joint Pension Tr. v.
Freedom Food Ctr., Inc., 938 F.2d 136, 137 (9th Cir. 1991). Generally, a judgment by confession
(alternatively called a confession of judgment, confessed judgment, or cognovit note) is an
“ancient legal device by which the debtor consents in advance to the holder's obtaining a judgment
Case 2:16-cv-02501-RFB-GWF Document 548 Filed 09/25/23 Page 2 of 7
1
without notice or hearing.” D.H. Overmyer Co. v. Frick Co., 405 U.S. 174, 176 (1972). United
2
States district courts have jurisdiction to render judgments by confession. See Bowles v. J.J.
3
Schmitt & Co., 170 F.2d 617, 620-21 (2d Cir. 1948); see also 46 Am. Jur. 2d Judgments § 216.
4
Moreover, it “is a product of state law and has no counterpart in the Federal rules.” J.D. Holdings,
5
LLC v. BD Ventures, LLC, 766 F. Supp. 2d 109, 113 (D.D.C. 2011) (citing FDIC v. Deglau, 207
6
F.3d 153, 159 (3d Cir. 2000)). As such,“[f]ederal courts may follow the state law’s procedures for
7
obtaining confessed judgments.” Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Yarrington, No. 13-CV-89-S, 2013
8
WL 11866198, at *1 (D. Wyo. June 13, 2013) see, e.g., Blue Sunsets, LLC v. Kontilai, No. 2:18-
9
CV-90, 2020 WL 1148563, at *1 (D. Nev. Mar. 9, 2020) (considering and granting motion for
10
judgment by confession based on Nevada law).
11
Nevada permits confessions of judgment. Nev. Rev. Stat. (“NRS”) § 17.090; see generally
12
Coast to Coast Demolition & Crushing, Inc. v. Real Equity Pursuit, LLC, 226 P.3d 605, 606 (Nev.
13
2010) (providing background on Nevada’s confessions of judgment statute). Specifically,
14
“[e]xcept as otherwise provided by law, a judgment by confession may be entered without action,
15
either for money due or to become due or to secure any person against contingent liability on
16
behalf of the defendant, or both, in the manner prescribed by this section and NRS 17.100 and
17
17.110.” NRS § 17.090. As such, when parties move for confessions by judgment, they must obtain
18
a “statement in writing,” “signed by the defendant and verified by his or her oath,” the following:
19
20
21
22
23
24
1. It shall authorize the entry of judgment for a specified sum.
2. If it be money due, or to become due, it shall state concisely the
facts out of which it arose, and shall show that the sum confessed
therefor is justly due, or to become due.
3. If it be for the purpose of securing the plaintiff against a
contingent liability, it shall state concisely the facts constituting the
liability, and shall show that the sum confessed therefor does not
exceed the same.
25
NRS § 17.100. “NRS 17.110 addresses entry of the confessed judgment on the clerk’s judgment
26
roll.” Coast to Coast Demolition & Crushing, Inc., 226 P.3d at 607.
27
28
b. Discussion
In this action, the Board of Trustees (fiduciaries) of Unite Here Health (“UHH”), an ERISA
-2-
Case 2:16-cv-02501-RFB-GWF Document 548 Filed 09/25/23 Page 3 of 7
1
welfare plan, asserts multiple legal theories in support of its effort to recover the value of benefits
2
that certain Defendants improperly caused UHH to pay. Defendants are current or former
3
participants in UHH’s benefit plan and their ex-spouses. According to Plaintiff these Defendants,
4
either by omission, or by actively misleading UHH, often in writing, caused UHH to pay dependent
5
spouse benefits after the Defendants had divorced and lost eligibility for benefits, thereby
6
obtaining the benefits in violation of the governing terms of UHH’s ERISA Plan Documents.
7
i. First Motion for Judgment by Confession
8
After Defendants Carlos Munoz and Melanie Munoz agreed to a judgment amount and
9
settlement payment plan with Plaintiff, the parties filed a Stipulation and Order to Dismiss
10
Defendants from this case without prejudice, which the Court granted. The judgment amount was
11
$13,623.61. The Court would also retain jurisdiction to take further action in the event Defendants
12
failed to remit to Plaintiff all payments promised to it. The Parties agreed that Defendants’ failure
13
to satisfy any of the conditions set forth in the Stipulation, and particularly the payment obligations
14
it imposed, constituted an event of default. The Parties agreed that in the event of a default, the
15
judgment amount would be increased to include (1) interest accrued at the rate of seven percent
16
per annum from the date of default (as that term is defined under the Stipulation) until paid in full,
17
(2) the amount of all reasonable costs and attorney’s fees expended in collecting said judgment by
18
execution, or otherwise, as established by affidavit. The Parties also agreed that the judgment
19
amount would be reduced by any sums paid by Defendants toward the judgment amount.
20
Defendants failed to make any payments after June 29, 2021, and therefore are currently in default.
21
Plaintiff notified them, demanding they cure the default, to no avail. This instant motion for
22
judgment by confession follows.
23
The Court finds that the confession of judgment Plaintiff attaches to the instant motion
24
complies with NRS § 17.100. First, Defendants signed the confession verified by their oath.
25
Second, the confession of judgment authorizes judgment for a specified sum of money.
26
Specifically, it states that Defendants are liable for: (1) a $13,623.61 judgment amount, (2) post-
27
judgment interest accrual on the judgment amount balance at the rate of seven percent per annum
28
from the date of default, and (3) reasonable costs and attorney's fees expended in collecting said
-3-
Case 2:16-cv-02501-RFB-GWF Document 548 Filed 09/25/23 Page 4 of 7
1
Judgment by execution, or otherwise, as shall be established by affidavit; but which (4) shall, as
2
applicable, be reduced by any amount paid by Defendants toward the judgment amount. To this
3
end, Plaintiff’s motion attaches a declaration seeking the following specified sum of $11,927.42,
4
based on the stipulation for entry of judgment by confession:
5
•
$8,991.43 as the base judgment amount, crediting $4,632.18 for Defendants’
payment to Plaintiff since February 2017; plus
6
7
•
$935.99 in interest accrued through February 2, 2023 at the rate of 7% per annum
(and continuing to accrue until paid in full); plus
8
9
•
reasonable attorney’s fees in the amount of $2,000 incurred by Plaintiff to obtain
10
the Judgment required by the Stipulation, the Confession of Judgment, and the
11
related papers signed by Defendant.
12
Third, confession of judgment concisely states that this money due arose from Defendants’
13
conduct receiving fringe benefits from Plaintiff after failing to provide Plaintiff with notice of
14
Defendants’ divorce and ineligibility. Finally, it shows the sum is justly due because Defendants
15
defaulted on their payment. Further, the confession incorporates by reference the stipulation for
16
entry of judgment by confession which states that the judgment amount, plus interest accrual, and
17
reasonable attorney’s fees would be due in the event of a default.
18
19
Accordingly, this judgment by confession complies with NRS § 17.100 and is entered
without action pursuant to NRS § 17.090.
ii. Second Motion for Judgment by Confession
20
21
On February 3, 2017, Defendants Martha Castellon and Sergio Sepulveda filed a
22
Stipulation and Order to Dismiss Defendants from this case without prejudice after they entered
23
into a written agreement to make monthly payments to satisfy a judgment amount. The Court
24
granted this stipulation. ECF No. 54. Defendants made a similar agreement as the Muñozes. Their
25
judgment amount was $14,133.59. They defaulted after failing to make any payments after
26
September 26, 2017. To date, they have only paid $1,272 toward the judgment amount. Plaintiff
27
attempted to notify Defendants of their default as late as January 18, 2023, but it has received no
28
response.
-4-
Case 2:16-cv-02501-RFB-GWF Document 548 Filed 09/25/23 Page 5 of 7
1
The Court finds that Defendants’ confession of judgment, which Plaintiff attaches to the
2
instant motion complies with NRS 17.100. ECF No. 539-2. Defendants signed it verified by their
3
oath. The confession authorizes judgment for a specified sum of money. Specifically, it states that
4
Defendants are liable for: (1) a $14,133.59 judgment amount, (2) post-judgment interest accrual
5
on the judgment amount balance at the rate of seven percent per annum from the date of default,
6
and (3) reasonable costs and attorney's fees expended in collecting said Judgment by execution, or
7
otherwise, as shall be established by affidavit; but which (4) shall, as applicable, be reduced by
8
any amount paid by Defendants toward the judgment amount. To this end, Plaintiff’s motion
9
attaches a declaration seeking the following specified sum of $19,693.68, based on the stipulation
10
11
for entry of judgment by confession:
•
payment to Plaintiff since February 2017; plus
12
13
•
$4,832.08 in interest accrued through January 30, 2023 at the rate of 7% per annum
(and continuing to accrue until paid in full); plus
14
15
$12,861.60 as the base judgment amount, crediting $1,272 for Defendants’
•
reasonable attorney’s fees in the amount of $2,000 incurred by Plaintiff to obtain
16
the Judgment required by the Stipulation, the Confession of Judgment, and the
17
related papers signed by Defendants.
18
Additionally, the confession of judgment concisely states that this money due arose out of
19
Defendants’ conduct receiving fringe benefits from Plaintiff after failing to provide Plaintiff with
20
notice of Defendants’ divorce and ineligibility. Finally, it shows the sum is justly due because
21
defendants defaulted on their payment. Further, the confession of judgment incorporates the
22
stipulation for entry of judgment by confession which states that the judgment amount, plus interest
23
accrual, and reasonable attorney’s fees would be due in the event of a default.
24
25
26
Therefore, this confession of judgment also complies with NRS § 17.100 and is entered
without action pursuant to NRS § 17.090.
iii. Third Motion for Judgment by Confession
27
Like the other Defendants, Defendant Roberto Flores executed a stipulation, judgment, and
28
settlement payment plan where he agreed to pay his own judgment amount of $6,150.89. To do
-5-
Case 2:16-cv-02501-RFB-GWF Document 548 Filed 09/25/23 Page 6 of 7
1
so, he filed a stipulation to dismiss this case without prejudice like the other Defendants on
2
February 24, 2017, which the Court granted on February 27, 2017. He defaulted after failing to
3
make any payments after June 1, 2020. To date, he has only paid $525 toward the judgment
4
amount. Plaintiff attempted to notify Defendant of his default as late as January 20, 2023, but it
5
has received no response.
6
Like the others, the Court finds that Defendant’s confession of judgment, which Plaintiff
7
attaches to the instant motion complies with NRS § 17.100. Defendant signed it verified by his
8
oath. The confession authorizes judgment for a specified sum of money. Specifically, it states that
9
Defendants are liable for: (1) a $6,150.89 judgment amount, (2) post-judgment interest accrual on
10
the judgment amount balance at the rate of seven percent per annum from the date of default, and
11
(3) reasonable costs and attorney’s fees expended in collecting said Judgment by execution, or
12
otherwise, as shall be established by affidavit; but which (4) shall, as applicable, be reduced by
13
any amount paid by Defendants toward the judgment amount. To this end, Plaintiff’s motion
14
attaches a declaration seeking the following specified sum of $7,946.79, based on the stipulation
15
for entry of judgment by confession:
16
•
$5,010.80 as the base judgment amount, providing Defendant with proper credits
17
to which Defendant is entitled to, including payments made to Plaintiff since
18
February 2017; plus
19
•
(and continuing to accrue until paid in full); plus
20
21
$935.99 in interest accrued through January 30, 2023 at the rate of 7% per annum
•
reasonable attorney’s fees in the amount of $2,000 incurred by Plaintiff to obtain
22
the Judgment required by the Stipulation, the Confession of Judgment, and the
23
related papers signed by Defendant.
24
Additionally, the confession of judgment concisely states that this money due arose out of
25
Defendant’s conduct receiving fringe benefits from Plaintiff after failing to provide Plaintiff with
26
notice of Defendants’ divorce and ineligibility. Finally, it shows the sum is justly due because
27
Defendants defaulted on their payment. Further, the confession of judgment incorporates the
28
stipulation for entry of judgment by confession which states that the judgment amount, plus interest
-6-
Case 2:16-cv-02501-RFB-GWF Document 548 Filed 09/25/23 Page 7 of 7
1
2
3
accrual, and reasonable attorney’s fees would be due in the event of a default.
Thus, this judgment by confession complies with NRS § 17.100 and is entered without
action pursuant to NRS § 17.090.
4
5
III.
6
IT IS ORDERED that MOTION for the Writ of Execution Myesha Johnson (ECF No.
7
537) is DENIED without prejudice. On October 6, 2020, the Clerk of Court entered a third
8
amended judgment in the amount of $4,018.13 against Defendants Myesha Johnson and Robert
9
White. ECF No. 441. On June 18, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion for writ of execution seeking
10
satisfaction of this judgment amount against Defendant Johnson. ECF No. 501. Three days later
11
the Clerk issued the writ. ECF No. 502. On December 2, 2022, Plaintiff filed another motion for
12
writ of execution against Defendant Johnson —the instant motion for writ of execution. ECF No.
13
537. Plaintiff may file a new motion for writ of execution with the affidavit and proposed writ of
14
execution against Defendant Johnson. Plaintiff shall file a supplement clarifying the difference
15
between the motion already granted and the renewed motion.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
CONCLUSION
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the MOTION for Judgment by Confession (ECF No.
538) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the MOTION for Judgment by Confession (ECF No.
539) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the MOTION for Judgment by Confession (ECF No.
540) is DENIED as moot, as Plaintiff withdrew the motion. See ECF No. 542.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that MOTION for Judgment by Confession (ECF No. 541)
is GRANTED.
24
25
DATED: September 25, 2023
26
__________________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
28
-7-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?