Omix Ada, Inc. v. Changzhou Jiulong Auto Lamps Factory et al
Filing
10
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. ORDERED that Omix shall deposit $10,000.00 with the Clerk of Court. Defendants shall file an application by 11/7/2016 3:00pm. FURTHER ORDERED that a preliminary injunction hearing is set for 11/10/2016 11:30am in Co urtroom 7D before the Honorable Gloria M. Navarro. Defendants shall serve any opposition to motion for preliminary injunction on or before 11/8/2016 3:00pm. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 11/1/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: Finance - JM)
Case 2:16-cv-02527-GMN-CWH Document 4 Filed 11/01/16 Page 1 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC
JOHN L. KRIEGER
Nevada Bar No. 6023
Email: jkrieger@dickinson-wright.com
JOEL Z. SCHWARZ
Nevada Bar No. 9181
Email: jschwarz@dickinson-wright.com
KENDAL L. WEISENMILLER
Nevada Bar No. 11946
Email: kweisenmiller@dickinson-wright.com
8363 West Sunset Road, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89113-2210
Tel: (702) 550-4400
Fax: (702) 382-1661
Attorneys for Plaintiff Omix-ADA, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
8363 West Sunset Road, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89113-2210
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
13
OMIX-ADA, INC., a Georgia Corporation,
CASE NO. 2:16-cv-2527
DEPT.
Plaintiff,
14
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
AND SEIZURE ORDER
15
v.
16
CHANGZHOU JIULONG AUTO LAMPS
FACTORY; GUANGZHOU VCAN
ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.;
MAXGRAND, LTD.; SANMAK LIGHTING
CO., LTD.; SHENZHEN UNISUN
TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.; and UNITY 4WD
ACCESSORIES CO., LTD.,
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Defendants.
Plaintiff OMIX-ADA, INC. (“Omix” or “Plaintiff”) has moved ex parte for a Temporary
Restraining Order, Seizure Order and a Preliminary Injunction, pursuant to the Patent Act, 35
U.S.C. § 283; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) 64 and 65; and Local Rule (“LR”) 7-4.
Omix alleges Changzhou Jiulong Auto Lamps Factory (“Changzhou Jiulong”);
Guangzhou Vcan Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. (“Guangzho Vcan”); Maxgrand, Ltd.
(“Maxgrand”); Sanmak Lighting Co., Ltd. (“Sanmak”); Shenzhen Unisun Technology Co., Ltd.
28
1
Case 2:16-cv-02527-GMN-CWH Document 4 Filed 11/01/16 Page 2 of 6
1
(“Unisun”) and Unity 4WD Accessories Co., LTD. (“Unity”, and together with Changzhou
2
Jiulong, Guangzhou Vcan, Maxgrand, Sanmak and Unisun, the “Defendants”) have made,
3
imported into the United States, sold, offered to sell, distributed, promoted, and/or advertised at
4
the SEMA Show (“SEMA”) held on November 1-4, 2016 at the Las Vegas Convention Center
5
and the Automotive Aftermarket Products Expo (“AAPEX”) held on November 1-3, 2016 at the
6
Sands Expo, products that infringe U.S. Patent Nos. US 9,145,084 B2 (the “ ‘084 Patent”)
7
entitled “Auxiliary Light Mount Assembly for Tubular Bumpers”, US D692,290 S (the “ ’290
8
Patent”) entitled “Hood Latch”, and US D749,995 S (the “ ‘995 Patent” and, collectively with
9
the ‘084 Patent, the “Omix Patents”) entitled “Front Grille for a Vehicle”, and the RUGGED
10
RIDGE trademarks owned by Omix, Registration No. 3,596,653 and 3,671,044.
8363 West Sunset Road, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89113-2210
11
The Court, having duly considered Omix’s Complaint, Emergency Ex Parte Motion And
12
Supporting Memorandum For Entry Of A Temporary Restraining Order, Seizure Order And
13
Preliminary Injunction, and the declarations and exhibits submitted therewith, hereby makes the
14
following findings and conclusions:
15
1.
Omix is likely to succeed on the merits of its patent infringement claims. Omix is
16
likely to succeed in showing that the ‘084 Patent is owned by Omix, is valid and enforceable,
17
and that Defendants Guangzhou Vcan Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. (“Guangzho Vcan”);
18
Sanmak Lighting Co., Ltd (“Sanmak”); Shenzhen Unisun Technology Co., Ltd. (“Unisun”), and
19
Unity 4WD Accessories Co., Ltd. (“Unity” and, collectively with Guangzho Vcan, Sanmark and
20
Unison, the “ ‘084 Defendants”) have imported into the United States, sold, offered to sell,
21
distributed, promoted, and/or advertised auxiliary light mount assemblies for tubular bumpers
22
that infringe on the ‘084 Patent (the “ ‘084 Infringing Products”).
23
Defendants have identified their ‘084 Infringing Products by the following SKU numbers:
24
Defendant Guangzhou Vcan – SKU V-W21, and Defendant Unisun – SKU UT-B101.
At AAPEX, the ‘084
25
Omix is likely to succeed in showing that the ‘290 patent is owned by Omix, is valid and
26
enforceable, and that Defendant Unity has imported into the United States, sold, offered to sell,
27
distributed, promoted, and/or advertised hood latches that infringe on the ‘290 Patent (the “ ‘290
28
Infringing Produts”).
2
Case 2:16-cv-02527-GMN-CWH Document 4 Filed 11/01/16 Page 3 of 6
1
Omix is likely to succeed in showing that the ‘995 Patent is owned by Omix, is valid and
2
enforceable, and that Changzhou Jiulong Auto Lamps Factory (“Changzhou Jiulong”);
3
Maxgrand, LTD. (“Maxgrand”) and Unity (together with Changzhou Jiulong and Maxgrand, the
4
“ ‘995 Defendants”) have imported into the United States, sold, offered to sell, distributed,
5
promoted, and/or advertised front grilles that infringe on the ‘995 Patent (the “ ‘995 Infringing
6
Products”).
7
Omix is likely to succeed in showing that Defendant Unity is intentionally using a mark
8
that is identical or nearly identical to Omix’s RUGGED RIDGE mark for the same goods that
9
Omix’s federally-registered trademarks protect and that confusion is inevitable.
2.
10
It appears to the Court that Defendants are China-based manufacturers of
8363 West Sunset Road, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89113-2210
11
aftermarket auto care parts and automotive specialty products that, with the exception of their
12
temporary presence in Las Vegas during the AAPEX and/or SEMA tradeshows, do not have a
13
regular place of business or assets in the United States. Defendants have imported into the
14
United States, sold and/or offered to sell the ‘084 Infringing Products, the ‘290 Infringing
15
Products, and ‘995 Infringing Products, respectively, at the AAPEX and/or SEMA tradeshows
16
and will then promptly leave the United States.
3.
17
Absent an ex parte temporary restraining order and seizure order, Defendants’
18
importation, sale and/or offers to sell the ‘084 Infringing Products, ‘290 Infringing Products, and
19
the ‘995 Infringing Products will result in immediate and irreparable injury to Omix in the form
20
of loss of control over its valuable intellectual property rights, loss of consumer goodwill, and
21
interference with Omix’s ability to exploit the Omix Patents. Further, because Defendants have
22
no presence in the United States, it may be difficult or impossible for Omix to recover a money
23
judgment against any of the Defendants.
4.
24
The harm to Omix in denying the requested temporary restraining order and
25
seizure order outweighs the harm to the legitimate interests of Defendants from granting such
26
relief.
27
28
5.
The public interest weighs in favor of granting Omix the requested temporary
restraining order and seizure order.
3
Case 2:16-cv-02527-GMN-CWH Document 4 Filed 11/01/16 Page 4 of 6
1
6.
The ‘084 Infringing Products, ‘290 Infringing Products, and ‘995 Infringing
2
Products and materials evidencing Defendants’ infringements alleged in the Complaint are in
3
Defendants’ possession at the AAPEX and/or SEMA tradeshows currently taking place in Las
4
Vegas, Nevada, but these materials would likely be destroyed, moved, hidden or otherwise made
5
inaccessible to the Court if Omix were to proceed on notice to Defendants.
6
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pending a decision by the Court on Omix’s
8
application for a preliminary injunction, the ‘084 Defendants and their officers, agents, servants,
9
employees and attorneys, and all other persons acting in active concert or participation with any
10
of them, are hereby immediately, temporarily restrained from infringing the ‘084 Patent at the
11
8363 West Sunset Road, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89113-2210
7
AAPEX tradeshow in Las Vegas, Nevada from November 1-3, 2016, and the SEMA tradeshow
12
in Las Vegas, Nevada from November 1-4, 2016. Specifically, the ‘084 Defendants are hereby
13
temporarily restrained from making, using, selling, offering to sell, and importing into the United
14
States footwear designs covered by U.S. Patent No. US 9,145,084 B2 and colorable imitations
15
thereof. In addition, the ‘084 Defendants are hereby temporarily restrained from transferring,
16
moving, returning, destroying or otherwise disposing of any ‘084 Infringing Products except
17
pursuant to the below Seizure Order.
18
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pending a decision by the Court on Omix’s
19
application for a preliminary injunction, the ‘995 Defendants and their officers, agents, servants,
20
employees and attorneys, and all other persons acting in active concert or participation with any
21
of them, are hereby immediately, temporarily restrained from infringing the ‘995 Patent at the
22
AAPEX tradeshow in Las Vegas, Nevada from November 1-3, 2016, and the SEMA tradeshow
23
in Las Vegas, Nevada from November 1-4, 2016. Specifically, the ‘995 Defendants are hereby
24
temporarily restrained from making, using, selling, offering to sell, and importing into the United
25
States footwear designs covered by U.S. Patent No. US D749,995 S and colorable imitations
26
thereof. In addition, the ‘995 Defendants are hereby temporarily restrained from transferring,
27
moving, returning, destroying or otherwise disposing of any ‘995 Infringing Products except
28
pursuant to the below Seizure Order.
4
Case 2:16-cv-02527-GMN-CWH Document 4 Filed 11/01/16 Page 5 of 6
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pending a decision by the Court on Omix’s
2
application for a preliminary injunction, Defendant Unity and its officers, agents, servants,
3
employees and attorneys, and all other persons acting in active concert or participation with any
4
of them, are hereby immediately, temporarily restrained from infringing the ‘290 Patent at the
5
SEMA tradeshow in Las Vegas, Nevada from November 1-4, 2016. Specifically, Defendant
6
Unity is hereby temporarily restrained from making, using, selling, offering to sell, and
7
importing into the United States footwear designs covered by U.S. Patent No. US D692,290 S
8
and colorable imitations thereof. In addition, Defendant Unity is hereby temporarily restrained
9
from transferring, moving, returning, destroying or otherwise disposing of any ‘290 Infringing
10
8363 West Sunset Road, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89113-2210
11
Products except pursuant to the below Seizure Order.
SEIZURE ORDER
12
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ ‘084 Infringing Products, ‘290 Infringing
13
Products, and ‘995 Infringing Products, records (including computers and electronic evidence) of
14
Defendants’ sales and offers to sell infringing products, and Defendants’ promotional display(s),
15
sales equipment, materials used to facilitate Defendants’ infringements, catalogues and other
16
marketing materials, and tooling (collectively, “Materials”) shall be seized by the United States
17
Marshals Service, assisted by one or more attorneys or representatives of Omix, at the booths
18
rented or occupied by Defendants at the AAPEX tradeshow in Las Vegas, Nevada from
19
November 1-3, 2016, and the SEMA tradeshow in Las Vegas, Nevada from November 1-4,
20
2016. The ‘084 Infringing Products, ‘290 Infringing Products, and ‘995 Infringing Products that
21
the United States Marshals shall seize include SKU numbers SKU V-W21 and SKU UT-B101. If
22
Omix identifies more infringing products, they can petition the Court to amend this Order. The
23
Defendants shall destroy their inventory of Materials at Omix’s election.
24
The United States Marshals Service may use all reasonable force in conducting the
25
seizure and may open doors, locks, boxes, brief cases, and containers of any type or nature to
26
locate and identify Materials to be seized. Attorneys and other representatives of Omix shall
27
accompany the United States Marshals Service during the seizure to identify the Materials to be
28
seized. Omix’s counsel shall itemize and take possession of the seized Materials, provide a copy
5
Case 2:16-cv-02527-GMN-CWH Document 4 Filed 11/01/16 Page 6 of 6
1
of the inventory to the United States Marshals Service, and file the inventory with the Court. In
2
addition, Omix’s counsel may record the contents of Defendants’ booth and Materials by
3
photographic and/or videographic means during the seizure action. The United States Marshals
4
Service shall not retain custody of seized Materials. Omix agrees to indemnify the United States
5
Marshals Service and hold it harmless from any suit, claim, cause of action, damage, loss, or
6
injury arising from the execution of the seizure described in this Order.
7
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the U.S. Customs and Border Protection seize any ‘084
8
Infringing Products, ‘290 Infringing Products, and ‘995 Infringing Products coming into the
9
United States.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order and the Summons and Complaint must be
11
8363 West Sunset Road, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89113-2210
10
served upon Defendants, if found, at the time of the seizure, and by other means reasonably
12
calculated to give Defendants notice of this action.
13
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, Omix shall deposit $10,000.00 with the Clerk of the
14
Court as security for this order. To the extent Defendants believe that additional security is
15
necessary pursuant to Rule 65(c), Fed. R. Civ. P., Defendants shall file an application to the Court
16
and provide notice to counsel for Omix by 3:00 p.m. on Monday, November 7, 2016.
17
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a preliminary injunction hearing is set for Thursday,
18
November 10, 2016, at 11:30 a.m., in Courtroom 7D, before the Honorable Gloria M.
19
Navarro, United States District Judge. Defendants shall file and serve any opposition to
20
Omix’s motion for a preliminary injunction on or before 3:00 p.m. on Tuesday, November 8,
21
2016.
22
23
1
SIGNED AND ENTERED this ____ day of November, 2016.
24
25
26
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
28
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?