Omix Ada, Inc. v. Changzhou Jiulong Auto Lamps Factory et al
JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees in favor of Omix Ada, Inc. against Guangzhou Vcan Electronic Technology Co., LTD., Shenzhen Unisun Technology Co. LTD, Unity 4WD Accessories Co., Ltd. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 10/2/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
OAO450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
Changzhou Jiulong Auto Lamps Factory,
Case Number: 2:16-cv-02527-GMN-CWH
Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has d
d rendered its verdict.
Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a
d decision has been rendered.
Notice of Acceptance with Offer of Judgment. A notice of acceptance with offer of judgment has been filed in this
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED
that judgment is hereby entered for Attorney's Fees in favor of plaintiff against Defendants Guangzhou Vcan, Unisun,
and Unity, jointly and severally in the amount of $46,771.07.pursuant to Order #71
October 2, 2017
/s/ Debra K. Kempi
/s/ Justin Matott
(By) Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?