Morgan v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC

Filing 20

ORDER granting 19 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond Re: 18 Motion for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 12/1/2017. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/17/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Case 2:16-cv-02536-APG-PAL Document 19 Filed 11/16/17 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4

MICHAEL J. HARKER, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 005353
2901 El Camino Ave., #200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
[phone]
Attorney for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5
6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA
CAROL MORGAN, an individual
Plaintiff,

7
8

v.

9

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, a Corporation;
and DOES I through X inclusive,

10

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND DEADLINE FOR
PLAINTIFF TO ANSWER
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendants.
(First Request)

11
2901 El Camino Ave., #200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
[phone] - Fax [phone]

MICHAEL J. HARKER, ESQ.

CASE NO: 2:16-cv-02536-APG-PAL

12

This Stipulation to Extend Deadline for Plaintiff to Answer Defendants Motion for Summary

13

Judgment is entered into as of the date below by and between OCWEN LOAN SERVICING; by and

14

through their counsel, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, and Carol Morgan (“Plaintiff”) and together with

15

Defendants, (the Parties”), hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file an Opposition

16

to Defendant' s Motion for Summary Judgment from November 17, 2017 to December 1, 2017.

17

Defendants filed the Motion for Summary Judgment on or about October 27, 2017.
This is the parties first request for an extension of time to oppose the Motion for Summary

18
19

Judgment and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party. The reason for the

20

extension is to give the Plaintiff more time to evaluate and respond to the points and authorities set

21

forth in the Motion for Summary Judgment.

22
23
24
25

/ / /

26
27
28

1

morgan.stip&ord11.17.mw.wpd

Case 2:16-cv-02536-APG-PAL Document 19 Filed 11/16/17 Page 2 of 2

1
2
3

WHEREAS the parties stipulate and agree as follows:

4

Plaintiff shall have until December 1, 2017 to respond to Defendant’s Motion for Summary

5
6

Judgment.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

7
8
9

Dated: November 16, 2017

Dated: November 16, 2017

Submitted by:
The Law Office of Michael J. Harker, Esq.

Approved By:
Greenberg Traurig, LLP

/s/ Michael J. Harker
MICHAEL J. HARKER, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No.: 005353
2901 El Camino Ave., Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89102
[phone]
Attorney for Plaintiff

/s/ Jacob D. Bundick, Esq.
JACOB D. BUNDICK, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No.: 009772
3773 Howard Hughes Parkway, #400 N.
Las Vegas, NV 89169
[phone]
Attorney for Defendant

11
2901 El Camino Ave., #200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
[phone] - Fax [phone]

MICHAEL J. HARKER, ESQ.

10

12
13
14
15
16
17

ORDER
18
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant’s
19
Motion for Summary Judgment shall be December 1, 2017.
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
Dated: November 17, 2017.
22
Dated this ____ day of _______, 2017
23
24

_________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

25
26
27
28

2

morgan.stip&ord11.17.mw.wpd