Cellemme v. Lynch et al

Filing 60

ORDER Granting Defendant's 57 Motion to Stay. Discovery in this matter is STAYED until the Court announces a decision on Defendant's 48 Motion to Dismiss. Defendant's 39 Motion to Quash is DENIED without prejudice to its reassertion should further discovery in this matter be necessary. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 12/13/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

DREE ANN CELLEMME,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
_______________________________________ )

Case No. 2:16-cv-02539-JAD-CWH

ORDER

Presently before the Court is Defendant’s motion to stay (ECF No. 57), filed on November

11

17, 2017. Plaintiff filed a response (ECF No. 57) on December 1, 2017, and Defendant filed a reply

12

on December 8, 2017.

13

Defendant moves to stay all pre-trial proceedings pending the Court’s decision on its motion

14

to dismiss (ECF No. 48), arguing that a stay is appropriate since the pending motion to dismiss

15

would be dispositive of all claims in this case, requires no further discovery, and is likely to be

16

granted. Plaintiff opposes the motion, suggesting that she believes some of her claims may survive

17

the motion to dismiss and that she has requested leave to amend her complaint should it be

18

dismissed.

19

It is within the Court’s broad discretion over discovery to determine whether a stay of

20

discovery is appropriate. Little v. City of Seattle, 863 F.2d 681, 685 (9th Cir. 1988). In determining

21

whether to stay discovery pending resolution of a dispositive motion, the party seeking the stay

22

“carries the heavy burden of making a ‘strong showing’ why discovery should be denied.” Turner

23

Broad. Sys., Inc. v. Tracinda Corp., 175 F.R.D. 554, 556 (D. Nev. 1997). In order to determine if a

24

stay is appropriate, the court considers whether (1) the pending motion is potentially dispositive of

25

the entire case or at least dispositive of the issue on which discovery is sought, and (2) the motion

26

can be decided without additional discovery. Ministerio Roca Solida v. U.S. Dep’t of Fish &

27

Wildlife, 288 F.R.D. 500, 506 (D. Nev. 2013). Further, “a stay of discovery should only be ordered

28

if the court is convinced that a plaintiff will be unable to state a claim for relief.” Tradebay LLC V.
1

1

eBay, Inc., 278 F.R.D. 597, 603 (D. Nev. 2011). Courts considering stays in this district have found

2

that meeting this standard is a “heavy burden” id., and not easily met (Kor Media Grp., LLC v.

3

Green, 294 F.R.D. 579, 583 (D. Nev. 2013)). The default assumption is that discovery should go

4

forward while a dispositive motion is pending. “Absent extraordinary circumstances, litigation

5

should not be delayed simply because a non-frivolous motion has been filed.” Id. (quoting Trzaska

6

v. Int'l Game Tech., 2011 WL 1233298, at *3 (D. Nev. Mar. 29, 2011)).

7

To determine whether a stay of a potentially dispositive motion is appropriate, courts in this

8

district take a “preliminary peek” at the motion. See Tradebay, 278 F.R.D. 602-603. This inquiry is

9

not meant to prejudge the motion, but rather to determine whether a stay would help to secure the

10

“just, speedy, and inexpensive determination” of the action as required by Rule 1 of the Federal

11

Rules of Civil Procedure. Id.

12

Here, Defendant argues that Plaintiff’s second amended complaint fails to correct the

13

deficiencies noted by this Court when it dismissed Plaintiff’s first amended complaint. Plaintiff does

14

not address this argument in her response to the instant motion, rather she asserts that Defendants did

15

not comply with her discovery requests, without specifying how such discovery would alter the

16

Court’s analysis.

17

In its order granting Defendant’s first motion to dismiss (ECF No. 40), the Court noted that

18

Plaintiff had failed to allege facts to support her sex-based discrimination claim, including that male

19

employees were treated more favorably than her, or that the legitimate, non-discriminatory reason

20

offered to explain her termination was pretextual. As for the disability-based discrimination claim,

21

the Court noted that Plaintiff failed to allege facts that would show she was terminated because of

22

her disability. The Court explained that it was not enough for Plaintiff to allege that she was treated

23

more harshly than comparators who did not claim a disability, because this constitutes a legal

24

conclusion, not a fact. The Court further explained that Plaintiff would have to provide specific

25

information about the comparators, their circumstances, and the FBI’s treatment of them in a way

26

that permits the inference that she was treated more harshly because of discrimination.

27
28

Defendant argues that Plaintiff’s amended complaint has not meaningfully addressed these
issues, so its renewed motion to dismiss will likely be granted. Plaintiff provides no relevant
2

1

argument to the contrary. Neither party suggests that the pending motion to dismiss would not be

2

dispositive of the entire case, or that further discovery is necessary for the Court to render a decision.

3

After a preliminary peek at Defendant’s motion to dismiss, the Court is convinced that it will be

4

granted. This finding does not constitute a judgment on the motion to dismiss, which will be fully

5

considered in a separate order.

6

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to stay (ECF No. 57) is

7

GRANTED. Discovery in this matter is STAYED until the Court announces a decision on

8

Defendant’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 48).

9
10
11

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s pending motion to quash (ECF No. 39) is
DENIED without prejudice to its reassertion, should further discovery in this matter be necessary.
DATED: December 13, 2017

12
13

_________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3