The Bank Of New York Mellon v. Elkhorn Community Association

Filing 64

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that BNYMs complaint be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/24/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, 8 Plaintiff(s), 9 10 11 Case No. 2:16-CV-2571 JCM (DJA) ORDER v. ELKHORN COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, ET AL., Defendant(s). 12 13 On December 23, 2019, the Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded the court’s order entering 14 15 summary judgment in favor of plaintiff Bank of New York Mellon (“BNYM”). (ECF No. 60). The instant case is the second action BNYM has brought against Elkorn Community 16 17 18 19 20 21 Association concerning the same property. In the first action, this court granted Elkorn’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(d). The Ninth Circuit noted that, “[u]nder Nevada law, a dismissal for failure to follow court rules was an ‘adjudication upon the merits,’ ‘even though the substantive issues have not been tried.’” (ECF No. 61 at 5 (citing Five Star Capital Corp. v. Ruby, 194 P.3d 709, 715 (Nev. 2008) (en banc)). On appeal, the Ninth Circuit held that Rule 41(b) and the doctrine of claim preclusion bar 22 23 24 the instant action. Id. at 3–4. Thus, the Ninth Circuit remanded the case with instructions to dismiss. Id. Accordingly, 25 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that BNYM’s complaint be, 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge and the same hereby is, DISMISSED. ... 1 The clerk is instructed to enter judgment and close the case accordingly. 2 DATED January 24, 2020. 3 4 __________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?