Isaza v. Social Security Administration
Filing
8
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 6 Magistrate Judge Hoffman's report and recommendation be, and the same hereby is, ADOPTED in its entirety. The court will dismiss plaintiff's complaint without prejudice to refile. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/17/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
RIGOBERTO ENRIQUE ISAZA,
8
9
10
Case No. 2:16-CV-2575 JCM (CWH)
Plaintiff(s),
ORDER
v.
SOCIAL SECURITTY ADMINISTRATION,
11
Defendant(s).
12
13
Presently before the court is Magistrate Judge Hoffman’s report and recommendation.
14
(ECF No. 6). No objections have been filed, and the deadline for filing objections has since passed.
15
This court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
16
recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Where a party timely objects
17
to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, then the court is required to “make a de novo
18
determination of those portions of the [report and recommendation] to which objection is made.”
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
20
Where a party fails to object, however, the court is not required to conduct “any review at
21
all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149
22
(1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a district court is not required to review a
23
magistrate judge’s report and recommendation where no objections have been filed. See United
24
States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114 (9th Cir. 2003) (disregarding the standard of review
25
employed by the district court when reviewing a report and recommendation to which no
26
objections were made).
27
Magistrate Judge Hoffman recommended “[p]laintiff’s case be dismissed without
28
prejudice” for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (ECF No. 6); see (ECF
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
1
No. 2). Plaintiff has not objected to the report and recommendation. Nevertheless, this court finds
2
it appropriate to engage in a de novo review to determine whether to adopt the recommendation of
3
the magistrate judge. Upon reviewing the recommendation and underlying briefs, the court finds
4
that good cause appears to adopt the magistrate judge’s findings.
5
Accordingly,
6
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Magistrate Judge
7
Hoffman’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 6) be, and the same hereby is, ADOPTED in its
8
entirety. The court will dismiss plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice to refile.
9
The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case.
10
11
12
DATED January 17, 2018.
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?