Douzat et al v. Nevada Restaurant Services, Inc.

Filing 42

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 29 Motion to Compel Defendant to Respond to Discovery Requests and Motion to Extend Discovery Deadline and 32 Motion for Protective Order are DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 3/14/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 5 ROBERT DOUZAT, 6 Plaintiff, 7 8 vs. NEVADA RESTAURANT SERVICES, et al., 9 2:16-cv-02578-JCM-VCF ORDER Defendants. 10 11 Before the Court are the Motion to Compel Defendant to Respond to Discovery Requests and 12 Motion to Extend Discovery Deadline (ECF No. 29) and Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 32). 13 The court has been informed that the parties have reached a settlement. (ECF No. 40). 14 Accordingly, 15 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Motion to Compel Defendant to Respond to Discovery Requests 16 and Motion to Extend Discovery Deadline (ECF No. 29) and Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 32) 17 are DENIED without prejudice. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 DATED this 13th day of March, 2018. _________________________ CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?