Bank of New York v. Ronald-Garcia Santos, et al.,
Filing
18
ORDER granting ECF No. 17 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Douglas D. Gerrard and Gary Milne are substituted in place of Eric Sebastian Powers and Edgar C. Smith for Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/3/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
8
9
10
THE BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE
FOR THE CERTIFICATEHOLDER S
CWALT, INC. ALTERNATIVE LOAN
TRUST 2006-OA2 MORTGAGE PASS
THROUGH CERTIFICATE, SERIES 2006OA2,
11
13
ORDER
(Subst Atty – ECF No. 17)
Plaintiff,
v.
12
Case No. 2:16-cv-02579-MMD-PAL
RONALD-GARCIA SANTOS, et al.,
Defendants.
14
15
This matter is before the court on the Substitution of Attorneys (ECF No. 17). Douglas D.
16
Gerrard and Gary Milne of Gerrard Cox Larsen seek leave to be substituted in place of Edgar C.
17
Smith and Eric S. Powers of Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP for Plaintiff. LR IA 11-6(c) provides that
18
the signature of an attorney to substitute in a case “constitutes an express acceptance of all dates
19
then set for pretrial proceedings, for trial or hearing, by the discovery plan, or in any court order.”
20
LR IA 11-6(d) also provides that the substitution of an attorney “shall not alone be reason for delay
21
of pretrial proceedings, discovery, the trial, or any hearing in this case.”
22
Having reviewed and considered the matter,
23
IT IS ORDERED that:
24
1. The Substitution of Attorney (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
2. Douglas D. Gerrard and Gary Milne of Gerrard Cox Larsen are substituted in the place
2
of Edgar C. Smith and Eric S. Powers of Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP for Plaintiff,
3
subject to the provisions of LR IA 11-6(c) and (d).
4
DATED this 3rd day of April, 2017.
5
6
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?