Luxottica Group S.p.A. v. Tran

Filing 20

ORDER that counsel for the parties shall file a Proposed Joint Pretrial Order by 10/20/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/6/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
    1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 LUXOTTICA GROUP S.P.A., 8 10 Plaintiff, v. 9 Case No. 2:16-cv-02584-JCM-PAL ORDER MINH D. TRAN, Defendant. 11 12 This matter is before the court on the parties= failure to file a joint pretrial order as required 13 by LR 26-1(e)(5). The Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (ECF No. 16) filed April 4, 2017, 14 required the parties to file a joint pretrial order required by LR 26-1(e)(5) no later than August 24, 15 2017. There are no dispositive motions pending. 16 On August 24, 2017, plaintiff’s counsel filed a Notice Regarding Pending Settlement (ECF 17 No. 19) which advised the court that the parties had settled, and that in the “unlikely event” 18 settlement documents were not finalized in the next 14 days, that plaintiff would provide further 19 notice to the court regarding the same, or would otherwise file the joint pretrial order at that time. 20 To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly, 21 IT IS ORDERED that: 22 1. Counsel for the parties shall file a joint pretrial order which fully complies with the 23 requirements of LR 16-3 and LR 16-4 no later than October 20, 2017. Failure to 24 timely comply may result in the imposition of sanctions up to and including a 25 recommendation to the District Judge of case dispositive sanctions. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1     1 2. The disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) and any objections thereto shall 2 be included in the pretrial order. 3 DATED this 6th day of October, 2017. 4 5 PEGGY A. LEEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?