Rood v. Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.

Filing 22

ORDER Granting 21 Stipulation re Discovery Deadlines. Discovery due by 4/2/2018. Motions due by 5/7/2018. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 6/7/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-02586-JAD-NJK Document 21 Filed 12/29/17 Page 1 of 4 7 LIPSON, NEILSON, COLE, SELTZER & GARIN, P.C. DAVID A. CLARK Nevada Bar No. 4443 ERIC N. TRAN Nevada Bar No. 11876 9900 Covington Cross Drive, Ste. 120 Las Vegas, Nevada 89144 (702) 382-1500 - Phone (702) 382-1512 - Fax dclark@lipsonneilson.com etran@lipsonneilson.com 8 Attorneys for Defendant Liberty Insurance Underwriters 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 12 MARTIN S. ROOD, Case No.: 2:16-cv-002586-JAD-NJK Plaintiff, 9900 Covington Cross Drive 13 vs. 14 LIBERTY INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS, INC., a Stock Insurance Company, a/k/a/ Liberty Mutual Group; DOES 1 through 5, and ROE COROPORATIONS 1 through 5, 15 16 STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES (Second Request) Defendant(s). 17 18 Plaintiff, Martin S. Rood (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant, Liberty Insurance 19 Underwriters, Inc. (“Defendant”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, 20 respectfully submit the following Stipulation and [Proposed] Order requesting to extend 21 the discovery deadline by Sixty (60) days of the current scheduling order deadlines. 22 This is the parties’ second request for an extension of the deadlines in this case. 23 I. INTRODUCTION. 24 On October 27, 2017, the Court entered a Stipulation and Order to Extend 25 Discovery Deadlines (First Request); (ECF No. 20) filed by the parties. The Stipulation 26 and Order set the following dates: 27 (a) Discovery Cut-off: February 1, 2018 28 (b) Deadline for Initial Expert Disclosures: December 4, 2017 Page 1 of 4 Case 2:16-cv-02586-JAD-NJK Document 21 Filed 12/29/17 Page 2 of 4 1 (c) Deadline for Rebuttal Expert Disclosures: January 3, 2018 2 (d) Interim Status Report: December 4, 2017 3 (e) Final Date to File Dispositive Motions: March 5, 2018 4 (f) Pretrial Order: April 4, 2018 (not later than 30 days after the date for dispositive motions, unless dispositive motions are filed). 5 6 II. STATEMENT SPECIFYING THE DISCOVERY COMPLETED 7 Pursuant to the requirements of LR6-1 and LR26-4, the parties provide the Court 8 with the following information in support of their stipulation to extend discovery in this 9 matter. 10 A. Discovery Completed. 11 1. Initial Disclosure served by Defendant; 12 2. Written Discovery (Interrogatories, Requests for Admissions, and 9900 Covington Cross Drive 13 Requests for Production of Documents) propounded by Plaintiff and 14 responded to by Defendant. 15 III. SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE DISCOVERY THAT REMAINS TO BE 16 COMPLETED. 17 3. Depositions of fact and party witnesses disclosed by the parties. 18 4. Additional written discovery to be completed by both parties. 19 B. Reason Why Discovery Has Not Been Completed. 20 The parties need additional time to complete discovery in an effort to avoid costs 21 of obtaining expert witnesses. The parties are exploring the possibility of settlement of 22 this dispute. 23 witnesses and complete written discovery. 24 IV. In addition, the parties need to conduct depositions of out-of-state REASONS WHY THE DISCOVERY REMAINING WILL NOT BE COMPLETED 25 WITHIN THE TIME LIMITS SET BY THE DISCOVERY ORDER. 26 Extending the discovery process will provide sufficient time for the parties to 27 respond to and propound additional written discovery, and notice and conduct 28 appropriate depositions, including out-of-state witnesses which scheduling is difficult Page 2 of 4 Case 2:16-cv-02586-JAD-NJK Document 21 Filed 12/29/17 Page 3 of 4 1 during the holiday season. 2 Pursuant to LR 26-4, herein parties aver that in view of the possibility of 3 settlement of this case, there is good cause to extend discovery deadlines in this matter, 4 to enable both parties to complete the whole discovery process, and/or to assess and 5 finalize settlement of this case. 6 The parties therefore respectfully request to extend the discovery deadline by 7 sixty (60) days of the discovery order for the above good reasons shown. This extension 8 is not intended to delay the progress of this case, but will instead allow the parties to 9 complete the entire discovery process, or settle the case. 10 V. The parties agree that discovery will be extended sixty (60) days from the 11 12 PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETING ALL REMAINING DISCOVERY. Stipulation and Order, and the deadlines will be extended as follows: 9900 Covington Cross Drive 13 A. Close of Discovery: April 2, 2018 (April 1, 2018 falls on a Sunday). 14 B. Final Date to File Dispositive Motions: May 7, 2018 (May 5, 2018 falls on a Saturday). 15 C. Pretrial Order: June 7, 2018 (not later than 30 days after the date for 16 dispositive motions, unless dispositive motions are filed). 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 VI. CURRENT TRIAL DATE. There is no trial date scheduled as of yet. Dated this 28th day of December, 2017 Dated this 28th day of December, 2017 SJ LAW LIPSON, NEILSON, COLE, SELTZER & GARIN, P.C. By: Spencer M. Judd, Esq. 325 So. 3rd Street, #5 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Attorneys for Plaintiff By:__ _______________ David A. Clark, Esq. Eric N. Tran, Esq. 9900 Covington Cross Dr., Ste.120 Las Vegas, Nevada 89144 Attorneys for Defendant Liberty Insurance Underwriters 28 Page 3 of 4 Case 2:16-cv-02586-JAD-NJK Document 21 Filed 12/29/17 Page 4 of 4 1 Rood vs. Liberty Insurance Underwriters Case No.: 2:16-cv-002586-JAD-NJK 2 ORDER 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. January 2, 2018 DATED: _______________ 6 7 ______________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 9900 Covington Cross Drive 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 4 of 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?