Ohlinger v. Marsh USA, Inc.

Filing 44

ORDER granting 35 Joint Motion to Approve Settlement. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 10/5/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-02588-JAD-CWH Document 43 Filed 09/26/17 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 GABROY LAW OFFICES Christian Gabroy (#8805) The District at Green Valley Ranch 170 South Green Valley Parkway, Suite 280 Henderson, Nevada 89012 Tel (702) 259-7777 Fax (702) 259-7704 christian@gabroy.com 5 6 7 8 Terrence Buehler (Pro Hac Vice) Law Office of Terrence Buehler The Oak Brook Terrace Atrium 17W220 22d Street, Suite 410 Oak Brook Terrace, IL 60181 (331) 225-2123 Peter Lubin (Pro Hac Vice) Vincent DiTommaso (Pro Hac Vice) DiTommaso-Lubin P.C. The Oak Brook Terrace Atrium 17W220 22d Street, Suite 410 Oak Brook Terrace, IL 60181 (630) 333-0000 9 10 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 170 S. Green Valley Pkwy., Suite 280 Henderson, Nevada 89012 (702) 259-7777 FAX: (702) 259-7704 GABROY LAW OFFICES 12 THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 13 14 15 BONNIE OHLINGER, AN INDIVIDUAL, ON BEHALF OF HERSELF AND ALL PERSONS SIMILARLY SITUATED; 16 Case No.: 2:16-cv-02588-JAD-CWH [PROPOSED] ORDER OF APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL Plaintiffs, vs. 17 18 19 20 MARSH USA, INC., A CORPORATION, EMPLOYEE(S)/AGENT(S) DOES I-X; AND ROE CORPORATION(S) XI-XX, INCLUSIVE, ECF Nos. 35, 43 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 [PROPOSED] ORDER OF APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Defendant Marsh USA Inc. (“Defendant”) and Plaintiffs Bonnie Ohlinger and Jennifer Silva’s (collectively, the “Parties”) Joint Motion to Approve Settlement of FLSA Action. Having reviewed the record to date, the terms and conditions of the settlement, and having considered the statements of counsel for the Parties; and based on the findings and conclusions placed on the record, 28 Page 1 of 4 Case 2:16-cv-02588-JAD-CWH Document 43 Filed 09/26/17 Page 2 of 4 1 THE COURT FINDS THAT: 2 A. The Parties have had a bona fide dispute as to whether Defendant properly 3 classified Plaintiffs as exempt employees under the administrative exemption, and whether 4 wages were due; 5 6 B. The Parties’ settlement, and the amount of the settlement, is fair, reasonable and adequate; and 7 C. 8 in similar cases. 9 For these reasons and those stated IS ORDERED THAT: Based on the foregoing findings, IT on the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The settlement amount is within the range of reasonable settlement amounts 2. The Clerk of the Court shall enter the dismissal its own fees in its entirety 2. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice, each side to bearof this action and costs., 12 170 S. Green Valley Pkwy., Suite 280 Henderson, Nevada 89012 (702) 259-7777 FAX: (702) 259-7704 1. The Parties’ Joint Settlement [ECF Settlement of FLSA Action is granted; 1. The Joint Motion to ApproveMotion to ApproveNo. 35] is GRANTED; 11 GABROY LAW OFFICES 10 except Clerk ofEach of settlement agreement. The Clerk of court is directed to CLOSE 3. prejudice. in the the Parties CLOSE her/its own withTheas statedCourt is directed toshall bearTHIS CASE.attorneys’ fees and costs, except 13 THIS CASE. insofar as an express portion of the Settlement Sum is allocated to Plaintiffs’ attorneys’ _____________________________ fees and costs by the Settlement Agreement. U.S. District Judge Jennifer Dorsey 10/5/17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 16 17 ENTERED this day of _____________________, 2017. 18 19 . The Honorable Jennifer A. Dorsey 20 21 Dated this 26th day of September 2017. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Respectfully submitted, GABROY LAW OFFICES By_/s/ Christian Gabroy___________ Christian Gabroy Kaine Messer The District at Green Valley Ranch 170 South Green Valley Parkway Suite 280 Henderson, Nevada 89012 Tel (702) 259-7777 Fax (702) 259-7704 Page 2 of 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?