Abdou, M.D. et al v. Davita, Inc. et al
Filing
210
ORDER withdrawing 202 Motion to Compel; ORDER denying as moot 203 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 11/6/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
Case 2:16-cv-02597-APG-CWH Document 204 Filed 11/05/18 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
JOHN R. BAILEY
Nevada Bar No. 0137
JOSHUA M. DICKEY
Nevada Bar No. 6621
KELLY B. STOUT
Nevada Bar No. 12105
PAUL C. WILLIAMS
Nevada Bar No. 12524
BAILEYKENNEDY
8984 Spanish Ridge Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148-1302
Telephone: 702.562.8820
Facsimile: 702.562.8821
JBailey@BaileyKennedy.com
JDickey@BaileyKennedy.com
KStout@BaileyKennedy.com
PWilliams@BaileyKennedy.com
Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaimants
DaVita Inc.; DaVita Medical Holdings, LLC;
and DaVita Medical Management, LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
13
14
SHERIF W. ABDOU, M.D. and AMIR S.
BACCHUS, M.D.,
Case No. 2:16-cv-02597-APG-CWH
15
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO WITHDRAW
DEFENDANTS/COUNTERCLAIMANTS’
MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF
DOCUMENTS [ECF NO. 202]
Plaintiffs,
16
v.
17
18
DAVITA INC., HEALTHCARE PARTNERS
HOLDINGS, LLC, and HEALTHCARE
PARTNERS, LLC,
19
Defendants.
20
________________________________________
21
AND RELATED CLAIMS.
22
23
IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants
24
Sherif W. Abdou, M.D. and Amir S. Bacchus, M.D. (“Abdou/Bacchus”) and Defendants/
25
Counterclaimants DaVita Inc. (“DaVita”), DaVita Medical Holdings, LLC, f/k/a HealthCare
26
Partners Holdings, LLC (“HCP Holdings”), and DaVita Medical Management, LLC, f/k/a
27
HealthCare Partners, LLC (“HCP”) (collectively, the “DaVita Parties”) (collectively, the “Parties”),
28
through their undersigned counsel, as follows:
Page 1 of 3
Case 2:16-cv-02597-APG-CWH Document 204 Filed 11/05/18 Page 2 of 3
1
1.
On October 23, 2018, the DaVita Parties filed their Motion to Compel Production of
2
Documents (ECF No. 202) (the “Motion to Compel”), seeking to compel responses to certain
3
requests for production propounded to Abdou/Bacchus.
4
2.
Subsequently, on October 26, 2018, Abdou/Bacchus produced responsive documents
5
to the DaVita Parties’ requests for production, which documents were the subject of the Motion to
6
Compel.
7
3.
Abdou/Bacchus have represented that, to the best of their knowledge, the documents
8
produced (on October 26, 2018) are a complete production of the documents requested in the Motion
9
to Compel.
10
4.
Based on Abdou/Bacchus’s production and representation, the Parties have agreed to
11
stipulate to withdraw the Motion to Compel.
12
DATED this 5th day of November, 2018.
DATED this 5th day of November, 2018.
13
KOLESAR & LEATHAM
BAILEYKENNEDY
14
By: /s/ Matthew T. Dushoff
MATTHEW T. DUSHOFF, ESQ.
Nevada Bar. No. 4975
WILLIAM D. SCHULER, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 11271
400 South Rampart Blvd., Suite 400
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Telephone: (702) 362-7800
Facsimile: (702) 362-9472
mdushoff@klnevada.com
wschuller@klnevada.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Sherif W. Abdou,
M.D. and Amir S. Bacchus, M.D.
By: /s/ Paul C. Williams
JOHN R. BAILEY
JOSHUA M. DICKEY
KELLY B. STOUT
PAUL C. WILLIAMS
Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaimants
DaVita Inc.; DaVita Medical Holdings, LLC;
and DaVita Medical Management, LLC
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 3
Case 2:16-cv-02597-APG-CWH Document 204 Filed 11/05/18 Page 3 of 3
1
ORDER
2
IT IS SO ORDERED:
3
The Motion to Compel (ECF No. 202) is hereby WITHDRAWN.
4
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the related motion for leave to file excess
pages (ECF No. 203) is DENIED as moot.
5
6
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
Dated:
8
9
Respectfully Submitted by:
10
BAILEYKENNEDY
11
By: /s/ Paul C. Williams
JOHN R. BAILEY
JOSHUA M. DICKEY
KELLY B. STOUT
PAUL C. WILLIAMS
Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaimants
DaVita Inc.; DaVita Medical Holdings, LLC;
and DaVita Medical Management, LLC
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 3 of 3
November 6, 2018
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?