Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Madeira Canyon Homeowners Association et al

Filing 16

ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that within 21 days from the date of this order, the parties must meet and confer and file a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 4/4/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) MADEIRA CANYON HOMEOWNERS ) ASSOCIATION, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:16-cv-02603-RFB-CWH ORDER 13 14 In reviewing the docket in this case, it has come to the court’s attention that the parties have 15 not filed a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. Local Rule 26-1(a) requires that the 16 “plaintiff’s attorney must initiate the scheduling of the conference required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) 17 to be held within 30 days after the first defendant answers or otherwise appears. Fourteen days 18 after the mandatory Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference, the parties must submit a stipulated discovery 19 plan and scheduling order.” Here, Defendant Madeira Canyon Homeowners Association filed a 20 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 10) on January 10, 2017. To date, the parties have not filed a 21 stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order. 22 23 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that within 21 days from the date of this order, the parties must meet and confer and file a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. 24 25 DATED: April 4, 2017 26 27 28 ______________________________________ C.W. Hoffman, Jr. United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?