Ditech Financial LLC v. T-Shack, Inc. et al

Filing 55

ORDER Granting 54 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 38 Motion for Summary Judgment (First Request) and Withdrawal of 53 Response. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 6/13/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ANDREW A. BAO, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10508 COLT B. DODRILL, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9000 WOLFE & WYMAN LLP 6757 Spencer St. Las Vegas, NV 89119 Tel: (702) 476-0100 Fax: (702) 476-0101 cbdodrill@wolfewyman.com Attorneys for Plaintiff DITECH FINANCIAL LLC 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 DITECH FINANCIAL LLC, 12 13 14 15 CASE NO. 2:16-cv-02615-RFB-VCF Plaintiff, v. T-SHACK, INC.; SUNDANCE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Defendants. 16 STIPULATION AND ORDER WITHDRAWING T-SHACK, INC.’S RESPONSE TO DITECH FINANCIAL LLC’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR REPLY 17 Plaintiff DITECH FINANCIAL LLC (“Ditech”) and Defendant T-SHACK, INC. (“T- 18 19 20 21 Shack”) (collectively, “Parties”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate the withdrawal of T-Shack’s Response to Ditech’s Motion for Summary Judgment filed on June 7, 2019 (ECF 53) and extend the deadline to reply. Local Rule 26-4 Statement 22 On April 10, 2019, this Court issued a minute order outlining the following deadlines: 23 Dispositive Motions Responses Replies 24 25 May 17, 2019 May 27, 2019 June 3, 2019 26 (ECF 37) 27 28 Ditech filed its Motion for Summary Judgment on May 17, 2019 (ECF 38), followed by an Errata on May 20, 2019 (ECF 41). T-Shack did not file its response until June 4, 2019 (ECF 51). T1 3374381.1 1 Shack then filed a second response on June 7, 2019 (ECF 53). T-Shack did not withdraw its initial 2 response, nor did it reference it in the second response. Thus, it is impossible for Ditech to reply 3 because Ditech cannot know which brief is operative. Additionally, because both responses filed by 4 T-Shack were untimely, there is no way to comply with the Court’s original June 3, 2019 deadline. 5 Consequently, the Parties stipulate as follows: IT IS STIPULATED THAT T-Shack, Inc. shall withdraw its Response filed on June 7, 2019 6 7 (ECF 53). IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED THAT Ditech Financial LLC shall have two weeks from 8 9 the date of the execution of this Stipulation to file its Reply. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 10 11 DATED: June 12, 2019 DATED: June 12, 2019 12 WOLFE & WYMAN LLP AYON LAW, PLLC 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 By: /s/ Andrew A. Bao By: /s/ Steven H. Burke ANDREW A. BAO, ESQ. LUIS A. AYON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10508 Nevada Bar No. 9752 COLT B. DODRILL, ESQ. STEVEN H. BURKE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9000 Nevada Bar No. 14037 6757 Spencer Street 8716 Spanish Ridge Ave., Ste. 115 Las Vegas, NV 89119 Las Vegas, NV 89148 Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys Defendant DITECH FINANCIAL LLC f/k/a GREEN T-SHACK, INC. TREE SERVICING, LLC 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. ________________________________ RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 22 23 24 Dated: __________________ 25 DATED this 13th day of June, 2019. _______________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 26 27 28 2 3374381.1 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 June 12, 2019, I served the STIPULATION AND ORDER WITHDRAWING T-SHACK, 3 INC.’S RESPONSE TO DITECH FINANCIAL LLC’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 4 JUDGMENT AND EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR REPLY by the following means to the 5 persons as listed below: X 6 7 a. ECF System (you must attach the “Notice of Electronic Filing”, or list all persons and addresses and attach additional paper if necessary): Allison R. Schmidt lmf@ayonlaw.com 8 allisonschmidtesq@gmail.com, allison@nevadaslawyers.com, 9 Luis Alonso Ayon laa@ayonlaw.com, ars@ayonlaw.com, cld@ayonlaw.com, eem@swinjurylaw.com, lmf@ayonlaw.com, mel@ayonlaw.com, sec@ayonlaw.com, vsg@ayonlaw.com 10 11 Ryan D Hastings rhastings@lkglawfirm.com, glacascia@lkglawfirm.com, pgutierrez@lkglawfirm.com, rcallaway@lkglawfirm.com, sanderson@lkglawfirm.com 12 13 b. 14 15 United States Mail, postage fully pre-paid (List persons and addresses. Attach additional paper if necessary): 16 By: /s/ Jamie Soquena Jamie Soquena An employee of Wolfe & Wyman LL 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 3374381.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?