Ditech Financial LLC v. T-Shack, Inc. et al
Filing
55
ORDER Granting 54 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 38 Motion for Summary Judgment (First Request) and Withdrawal of 53 Response. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 6/13/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
ANDREW A. BAO, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10508
COLT B. DODRILL, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9000
WOLFE & WYMAN LLP
6757 Spencer St.
Las Vegas, NV 89119
Tel: (702) 476-0100
Fax: (702) 476-0101
cbdodrill@wolfewyman.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DITECH FINANCIAL LLC
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11
DITECH FINANCIAL LLC,
12
13
14
15
CASE NO. 2:16-cv-02615-RFB-VCF
Plaintiff,
v.
T-SHACK, INC.; SUNDANCE HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION, INC.,
Defendants.
16
STIPULATION AND ORDER
WITHDRAWING T-SHACK, INC.’S
RESPONSE TO DITECH FINANCIAL
LLC’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT AND EXTENDING
DEADLINE FOR REPLY
17
Plaintiff DITECH FINANCIAL LLC (“Ditech”) and Defendant T-SHACK, INC. (“T-
18
19
20
21
Shack”) (collectively, “Parties”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate the
withdrawal of T-Shack’s Response to Ditech’s Motion for Summary Judgment filed on June 7, 2019
(ECF 53) and extend the deadline to reply.
Local Rule 26-4 Statement
22
On April 10, 2019, this Court issued a minute order outlining the following deadlines:
23
Dispositive Motions
Responses
Replies
24
25
May 17, 2019
May 27, 2019
June 3, 2019
26
(ECF 37)
27
28
Ditech filed its Motion for Summary Judgment on May 17, 2019 (ECF 38), followed by an
Errata on May 20, 2019 (ECF 41). T-Shack did not file its response until June 4, 2019 (ECF 51). T1
3374381.1
1
Shack then filed a second response on June 7, 2019 (ECF 53). T-Shack did not withdraw its initial
2
response, nor did it reference it in the second response. Thus, it is impossible for Ditech to reply
3
because Ditech cannot know which brief is operative. Additionally, because both responses filed by
4
T-Shack were untimely, there is no way to comply with the Court’s original June 3, 2019 deadline.
5
Consequently, the Parties stipulate as follows:
IT IS STIPULATED THAT T-Shack, Inc. shall withdraw its Response filed on June 7, 2019
6
7
(ECF 53).
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED THAT Ditech Financial LLC shall have two weeks from
8
9
the date of the execution of this Stipulation to file its Reply.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
10
11
DATED: June 12, 2019
DATED: June 12, 2019
12
WOLFE & WYMAN LLP
AYON LAW, PLLC
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
By:
/s/ Andrew A. Bao
By:
/s/ Steven H. Burke
ANDREW A. BAO, ESQ.
LUIS A. AYON, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10508
Nevada Bar No. 9752
COLT B. DODRILL, ESQ.
STEVEN H. BURKE, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9000
Nevada Bar No. 14037
6757 Spencer Street
8716 Spanish Ridge Ave., Ste. 115
Las Vegas, NV 89119
Las Vegas, NV 89148
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Attorneys Defendant
DITECH FINANCIAL LLC f/k/a GREEN
T-SHACK, INC.
TREE SERVICING, LLC
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
________________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
22
23
24
Dated: __________________
25
DATED this 13th day of June, 2019.
_______________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
26
27
28
2
3374381.1
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
June 12, 2019, I served the STIPULATION AND ORDER WITHDRAWING T-SHACK,
3
INC.’S RESPONSE TO DITECH FINANCIAL LLC’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
4
JUDGMENT AND EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR REPLY by the following means to the
5
persons as listed below:
X
6
7
a.
ECF System (you must attach the “Notice of Electronic Filing”, or list
all persons and addresses and attach additional paper if necessary):
Allison R. Schmidt
lmf@ayonlaw.com
8
allisonschmidtesq@gmail.com, allison@nevadaslawyers.com,
9
Luis Alonso Ayon laa@ayonlaw.com, ars@ayonlaw.com, cld@ayonlaw.com,
eem@swinjurylaw.com, lmf@ayonlaw.com, mel@ayonlaw.com, sec@ayonlaw.com,
vsg@ayonlaw.com
10
11
Ryan D Hastings rhastings@lkglawfirm.com, glacascia@lkglawfirm.com,
pgutierrez@lkglawfirm.com, rcallaway@lkglawfirm.com, sanderson@lkglawfirm.com
12
13
b.
14
15
United States Mail, postage fully pre-paid (List persons and addresses.
Attach additional paper if necessary):
16
By:
/s/ Jamie Soquena
Jamie Soquena
An employee of Wolfe & Wyman LL
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
3374381.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?