Daniels v. Unisa, Inc. et al

Filing 7

ORDER Denying 6 Stipulation to Extend Time. See Local Rule IA 6-1(a) (stipulations to extend time must state the reason for the extension sought). Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 12/20/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-02678-JCM-NJK Document 6 Filed 12/19/16 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 Jennifer L. Braster Nevada Bar No. 9982 MAUPIN • NAYLOR • BRASTER 1050 Indigo Drive, Suite 112 Las Vegas, NV 89145 (T) (702) 420-7000 (F) (702) 420-7001 jbraster@naylorandbrasterlaw.com Attorneys for Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 LATOYA DANIELS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 v. UNISA, INC., a foreign corporation; EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., a foreign corporation, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MAUPIN • NAYLOR • BRASTER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1050 Indigo Drive, Suite 112 Las Vegas, NV 89145 (702) 420-7000 Defendants. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// Case No. 2:16-cv-02678-JCM-NJK STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.’S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) Case 2:16-cv-02678-JCM-NJK Document 6 Filed 12/19/16 Page 2 of 2 1 It is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff Latoya Daniels (“Plaintiff”), through her 2 attorney Kevin L. Hernandez, and Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”), 3 through its attorneys, the law firm of Maupin Naylor Braster, as follows: 4 Plaintiff filed her Complaint on November 21, 2016. Experian was served on November 5 28, 2016. The deadline for Experian to respond to the Complaint is currently December 19, 2016. 6 Plaintiff and Experian stipulate and agree that Experian shall have until January 2, 2017, to file its 7 responsive pleading. This is the parties’ first request for an extension of time to respond to the 8 Complaint and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party. 9 DATED this 19th of December 2016. 10 11 12 LAW OFFICE OF KEVIN L. HERNANDEZ 13 14 15 16 17 By: /s/ Kevin L. Hernandez Kevin L. Hernandez Nevada Bar No. 12594 9555 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 220A Las Vegas, NV 89123 Attorneys for Plaintiff Latoya Daniels MAUPIN • NAYLOR • BRASTER By: /s/ Jennifer L. Braster Jennifer L. Braster Nevada Bar No. 9982 1050 Indigo Drive, Suite 112 Las Vegas, NV 89145 Attorneys for Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER DENIED. IS ORDERED THAT Experian Information Solutions, Inc.’s time to respond to IT See Local Rule IA 6-1(a) (stipulations to extend time must state the reason for the extension sought). Plaintiff’s Complaint shall be extended to on or before January 2, 2017. IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 26 U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE December 20, DATED this _____day of _________ 2016. 27 28 MAUPIN • NAYLOR • BRASTER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1050 Indigo Drive, Suite 112 Las Vegas, NV 89145 (702) 420-7000 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?