Gage v. Cox Communications, Inc.

Filing 11

ORDER Granting 9 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint. See Order for deadlines. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 2/10/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1

6

Kelly H. Dove, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10569
Michael Paretti, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13926
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 702.784.5252
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

7

Attorneys for Defendant Cox Communications, Inc.

2
3
4
5

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10

Snell & Wilmer

L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
702.784.5200

11

NOELLE GAGE;
Case No.: 2:16-cv-02708-KJD-GWF
Plaintiff,

12
13
14

ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

vs.
COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

(FIRST REQUEST)
Defendant.

15
16

Plaintiff Noelle Gage (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Cox Communications, Inc. (“Cox”), by

17

and through their undersigned counsel (collectively the “Parties”), for good cause shown, hereby

18

stipulate and agree to extend Cox’s deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint [Doc. 1] to

19

February 10, 2017. This is the Parties’ first extension request.

20
21

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1) and Local Rule 6-1, there exists good
cause to grant this extension to respond for the following reasons:

22

1.

Plaintiff only recently served the Complaint and Summons on Cox.

23

2.

Counsel for Cox was only recently retained, and requires additional time to locate,

24

organize, and review the relevant documents and prepare the appropriate response.

25

3.

The Parties agreed to the extension requested herein.

26

4.

This stipulated extension request is sought in good faith and is not made for the

27

purpose of delay.

28

///

1

Therefore, the Parties jointly agree to extend Cox’s deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s

2

Complaint to February 10, 2017.

3

Dated: January 27, 2017

Dated: January 27, 2017

4

HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC

SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.

By: /s/ Daniel Krieger
David H. Krieger, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9086
HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC
8985 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 350
Henderson, NV 89123

By: /s/ Kelly H. Dove
Kelly H. Dove, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10569
Michael Paretti, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13926
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite
1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169

5
6
7
8
9
10

Attorneys for Plaintiff Noelle Gage

Snell & Wilmer

L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
702.784.5200

11

Attorneys for Defendant Cox
Communications, Inc.

12
ORDER

13

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Cox Communications, Inc. shall respond to Plaintiff’s

14
15

Complaint on or before February 10, 2017.

16

DATED this ____ day of _______________ 2017.
10th
February,

17
_______________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

18
19
20

Respectfully submitted,
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27

By: /s/ Kelly H. Dove
Kelly H. Dove, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10569
Michael Paretti, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13926
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Attorneys for Defendant Cox Communications, Inc.
25654859

28
-2-