Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC

Filing 15

ORDER Denying 13 Stipulation to Respond to Complaint without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 02/02/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
11
Plaintiff(s),
12
vs.
13
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, et al.,
14
Defendant(s).
15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:16-cv-02726-RFB-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 13)

16

Pending before the Court is a stipulation to extend. Docket No. 13. That stipulation is defective.

17

See Local Rule IA 6-1(a) (requests for extension “must state the reasons for the extension requested”).

18

Accordingly, the stipulation is DENIED without prejudice.

19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20

DATED: February 2, 2017

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

______________________________________
_______________
__
___
NANCY J. KOPPE
KOPPE
OPPE
United States Magistrate Ju
Magistrate Judge
t
tates M s