Wilmington Trust, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al

Filing 15

ORDER Granting 9 Motion for Demand for Security of Costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 1/27/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3

***

4
5

WILMINGTON TRUST, N.A., et al.,
6

Plaintiffs,
7
8

vs.
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, et al.,

9

2:16-cv-02756-RFB-VCF
ORDER

Defendants.

10
11
12
13

Before the Court is SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC’s Demand for Security of Costs Pursuant to
NRS 18.130(1) (ECF No. 9).

14

Pursuant to 7-2(d), the failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any

15

motion, except a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 or a motion for attorney’s fees, constitutes a consent to

16

the granting of the motion. No opposition has been filed and the time to opposed as passed. Here, it

17

would seem that the other parties have consented to the granting of the instant motion.

18

Accordingly,

19

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC’s Demand for Security of Costs

20

Pursuant to NRS 18.130(1) (ECF No. 9) is GRANTED.

21

DATED this 27th day of January, 2017.

22
23
24
25

_________________________
CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE