HSBC Bank USA, National Association v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al
Filing
22
ORDER denying 21 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 3/15/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/13/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
***
11
HSBC BANK USA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, et al.,
15
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:16-cv-02762-RFB-NJK
ORDER
16
17
Pending before the Court is the parties’ stipulated proposed discovery plan and scheduling
18
order. Docket No. 21. Under Local Rule 26-1(b)(1),“[u]nless the court orders otherwise, discovery
19
periods longer than 180 days from the date the first defendant answers or otherwise appears will
20
require special scheduling review.” Additionally, “[p]lans requesting special scheduling review must
21
include . . . a statement of the reasons why longer or different time periods should apply to the case.”
22
Local Rule 26-1(a).
23
In this case, Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (“SFR”) first appeared on December
24
19, 2016, by filing a motion for demand for security of costs. Docket No. 7. The parties, however,
25
calculate the deadlines in their proposed discovery plan based on the subsequent date that Defendant
26
SFR answered Plaintiff’s complaint, without explaining why longer time periods should apply to this
27
case. Docket No. 14; Docket No. 21 at 2-3. Thus, the parties’ proposed discovery plan does not
28
comply with this Court’s Local Rules.
1
Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES the parties’ stipulated proposed discovery plan and
2
scheduling order. Docket No. 21. The parties shall file a proposed discovery plan that complies with
3
the Local Rules, no later than March 15, 2017.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
DATED: March 13, 2017.
6
7
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?