Bank of America, N.A. et al v. Santa Barbara Homeowners Association et al
Filing
123
ORDER granting ECF No. 122 Stipulation To Extend Time re ECF Nos. 119 and 121 Motions for Summary Judgment (First Request): BANA and Fannie Mae's response due by 1/25/2019. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/3/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
MELANIE D. MORGAN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 8215
DARREN T. BRENNER, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 8386
VATANA LAY, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 12993
AKERMAN LLP
1635 Village Center Circle, Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89134
Telephone: (702) 634-5000
Facsimile: (702) 380-8572
Email: melanie.morgan@akerman.com
Email: darren.brenner@akerman.com
Email: vatana.lay@akerman.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Bank of America, N.A.
and Federal National Mortgage Association
AKERMAN LLP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
1635 VILLAGE CENTER CIRCLE, SUITE 200
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89134
TEL.: (702) 634-5000 – FAX: (702) 380-8572
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11
12
13
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., successor by
merger to BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING,
LP fka COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS
SERVICING, LP and FEDERAL NATIONAL
MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION,
14
Case No.: 2:16-cv-02768-MMD-CWH
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND
PLAINTIFFS' DEADLINE TO OPPOSE:
Plaintiffs,
SANTA
BARBARA
HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION'S
MOTION
FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 119]
15
vs.
16
SANTA
BARBARA
HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION;
SFR
INVESTMENTS
POOL 1,
LLC;
and
ABSOLUTE
COLLECTION SERVICES, LLC,
17
18
SFR INVESTMENT POOL 1, LLC'S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ECF NO. 121]
(First Request)
Defendants.
19
20
Plaintiffs Bank of America, N.A. (BANA) and Federal National Mortgage Association
21
(Fannie Mae) and defendants Santa Barbara Homeowners Association (Santa Barbara),
22
Absolute Collection Services, LLC (Absolute) and SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (SFR) hereby
23
agree as follows:
24
1.
25
(ECF No. 119.)
26
2.
27
On December 18, 2018, Santa Barbara filed its motion for summary judgment.
On December 21, 2018, Absolute joined Santa Barbara's motion for summary
judgment (ECF No. 120.)
-147410757;1
3.
2
3
On December 21, 2018, SFR filed its motion for summary judgment (ECF No.
4.
1
Counsel for BANA and Fannie Mae needs additional time to reply to the argument
121.)
4
raised in defendants’ motions for summary judgment. The additional time will allow BANA and
5
Fannie Mae to properly address the issues raised.
6
7
8
9
AKERMAN LLP
1635 VILLAGE CENTER CIRCLE, SUITE 200
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89134
TEL.: (702) 634-5000 – FAX: (702) 380-8572
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
5.
The parties agree BANA and Fannie Mae's deadline to reply to defendants'
motions for summary judgment shall be extended to until January 25, 2019.
6.
This stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
DATED January 3, 2019
AKERMAN LLP
KIM GILBERT EBRON
/s/ Vatana Lay
MELANIE D. MORGAN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 8215
DARREN T. BRENNER, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 8386
VATANA LAY, ESQ.
Nevada. Bar No. 12993
1635 Village Center Cir. Ste. 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89134
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Federal National
Mortgage Association and Bank of
America, N.A.
BOYACK ORME & ANTHONY
/s/ Diana S. Ebron___________________
DIANA S. EBRON, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10580
JACQUELINE A. GILBERT, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10593
KAREN L. HANKS, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9578
7625 Dean Martin Drive, Suite 110
Las Vegas, Nevada 89139
Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool I, LLC
ABSOLUTE COLLECTION SERVICES, LLC
17
18
19
20
21
/s/ Colli C. McKiever
EDWARD D. BOYACK, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 5229
COLLI C. MCKIEVER, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13724
7432 W. Sahara Avenue, Suite 101
Las Vegas, Nevada 89117
Attorneys for Santa Barbara Homeowners
Association
22
23
/s/ Shane D. Cox
SHANE D. COX, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13852
Absolute Collection Services, LLC
7485 W. Azure Dr., Suite 129
Las Vegas, Nevada 89130
Attorney for Absolute Collection Services, LLC
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
______________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
25
January 3, 2019
DATED: ______________________
26
27
-247410757;1
_
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?