Bank of America, N.A. et al v. Santa Barbara Homeowners Association et al

Filing 123

ORDER granting ECF No. 122 Stipulation To Extend Time re ECF Nos. 119 and 121 Motions for Summary Judgment (First Request): BANA and Fannie Mae's response due by 1/25/2019. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/3/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 MELANIE D. MORGAN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8215 DARREN T. BRENNER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8386 VATANA LAY, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12993 AKERMAN LLP 1635 Village Center Circle, Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89134 Telephone: (702) 634-5000 Facsimile: (702) 380-8572 Email: melanie.morgan@akerman.com Email: darren.brenner@akerman.com Email: vatana.lay@akerman.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Bank of America, N.A. and Federal National Mortgage Association AKERMAN LLP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 1635 VILLAGE CENTER CIRCLE, SUITE 200 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89134 TEL.: (702) 634-5000 – FAX: (702) 380-8572 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 12 13 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., successor by merger to BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP fka COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, 14 Case No.: 2:16-cv-02768-MMD-CWH STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS' DEADLINE TO OPPOSE: Plaintiffs, SANTA BARBARA HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 119] 15 vs. 16 SANTA BARBARA HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION; SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC; and ABSOLUTE COLLECTION SERVICES, LLC, 17 18 SFR INVESTMENT POOL 1, LLC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 121] (First Request) Defendants. 19 20 Plaintiffs Bank of America, N.A. (BANA) and Federal National Mortgage Association 21 (Fannie Mae) and defendants Santa Barbara Homeowners Association (Santa Barbara), 22 Absolute Collection Services, LLC (Absolute) and SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (SFR) hereby 23 agree as follows: 24 1. 25 (ECF No. 119.) 26 2. 27 On December 18, 2018, Santa Barbara filed its motion for summary judgment. On December 21, 2018, Absolute joined Santa Barbara's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 120.) -147410757;1 3. 2 3 On December 21, 2018, SFR filed its motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 4. 1 Counsel for BANA and Fannie Mae needs additional time to reply to the argument 121.) 4 raised in defendants’ motions for summary judgment. The additional time will allow BANA and 5 Fannie Mae to properly address the issues raised. 6 7 8 9 AKERMAN LLP 1635 VILLAGE CENTER CIRCLE, SUITE 200 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89134 TEL.: (702) 634-5000 – FAX: (702) 380-8572 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 5. The parties agree BANA and Fannie Mae's deadline to reply to defendants' motions for summary judgment shall be extended to until January 25, 2019. 6. This stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. DATED January 3, 2019 AKERMAN LLP KIM GILBERT EBRON /s/ Vatana Lay MELANIE D. MORGAN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8215 DARREN T. BRENNER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8386 VATANA LAY, ESQ. Nevada. Bar No. 12993 1635 Village Center Cir. Ste. 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89134 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Federal National Mortgage Association and Bank of America, N.A. BOYACK ORME & ANTHONY /s/ Diana S. Ebron___________________ DIANA S. EBRON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10580 JACQUELINE A. GILBERT, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10593 KAREN L. HANKS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9578 7625 Dean Martin Drive, Suite 110 Las Vegas, Nevada 89139 Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool I, LLC ABSOLUTE COLLECTION SERVICES, LLC 17 18 19 20 21 /s/ Colli C. McKiever EDWARD D. BOYACK, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 5229 COLLI C. MCKIEVER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 13724 7432 W. Sahara Avenue, Suite 101 Las Vegas, Nevada 89117 Attorneys for Santa Barbara Homeowners Association 22 23 /s/ Shane D. Cox SHANE D. COX, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 13852 Absolute Collection Services, LLC 7485 W. Azure Dr., Suite 129 Las Vegas, Nevada 89130 Attorney for Absolute Collection Services, LLC ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 ______________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25 January 3, 2019 DATED: ______________________ 26 27 -247410757;1 _

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?