Bank of America, N.A. et al v. Santa Barbara Homeowners Association et al

Filing 94

ORDER granting ECF No. 93 Motion to Extend Time to file response to ECF No. 86 Motion for Summary Judgment. Response due by 10/12/2018. A briefing schedule within 5 days after ECF No. 87 Motion to Stay is decided with respect to: (a) SFR's deadline to respond to Fannie Mae and BANA's motion for summary judgment; and (b) Fannie Mae and BANAs deadline to file a reply supporting their motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/18/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

MELANIE D. MORGAN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 8215
VATANA LAY, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 12993
AKERMAN LLP
1160 Town Center Drive, Suite 330
Las Vegas, NV 89144
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Bank of America, N.A. and
Federal National Mortgage Association
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10

AKERMAN LLP

1160 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 330
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89144
TEL.: [phone] – FAX: [phone]

11
12
13

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., successor by
merger to BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING,
LP fka COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS
SERVICING, LP and FEDERAL NATIONAL
MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION,
Plaintiffs,

14

vs.

15

SANTA BARBARA HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION; SFR INVESTMENTS
POOL 1, LLC; and ABSOLUTE COLLECTION
SERVICES, LLC,
Defendants.

16
17
18
19

AND ALL RELATED CLAIMS.

20

Case No. 2:16-cv-02768-MMD-VCF
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND
TIME FOR:
(1) PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO SFR
INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC'S
COUNTERMOTION TO PLAINTIFFS'
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND FOR SFR TO REPLY [ECF NO. 86];
(2) SFR TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS'
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ECF NO. 84]; AND
(3) PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A REPLY
SUPPORTING ITS MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 84]

21

Pursuant to 7-1, plaintiffs Bank of America, N.A. (BANA) and Federal National Mortgage

22

Association (Fannie Mae) and defendants Santa Barbara Homeowners Association (Santa

23

Barbara) and SFR Investments Pool I, LLC (SFR) agree to coordinate briefing deadlines and

24

extend the deadlines as set forth herein:

25

1.

On August 31, 2018, Fannie Mae and BANA filed their motion for summary

26

judgment. ECF No. 84. SFR's current deadline to respond to the motion for summary judgment on

27

September 21, 2018.

28

2.
46420401;1

On September 4, 2018, SFR filed a countermotion to Fannie Mae and BANA's
1

1

motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 86. Fannie Mae and BANA's current deadline to respond

2

to the countermotion is September 18, 2018.

3

3.

On September 7, 2017, Fannie Mae filed a motion to stay discovery or in the

4

alternative emergency motion to quash the notice of deposition and/or for a protective order to limit

5

SFR's 30(b)(6) deposition topics. ECF No. 87.

6

4.

On September 12, 2018, Santa Barbara filed its opposition to Fannie Mae and

7

BANA’s motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 92. Fannie Mae and BANA’s current deadline

8

to reply in support of its motion for summary judgment responding to Santa Barbara’s opposition is

9

September 26, 2018.

10

5.

Counsel for Fannie Mae, BANA, and SFR need additional time to brief their

AKERMAN LLP

1160 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 330
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89144
TEL.: [phone] – FAX: [phone]

11

summary judgment positions. The additional time will allow the parties to properly address the

12

issues raised. The additional time also allows for coordinated briefing after ECF No. 87 is decided.

13

6.

The parties agree Fannie Mae and BANA’s deadline to respond to SFR's

14

countermotion to Fannie Mae and BANA's motion for summary judgment shall be extended until

15

October 12, 2018.

16

7.

The parties agree to submit a briefing schedule within 5 days after ECF No. 87 is

17

decided with respect to: (a) SFR's deadline to respond to Fannie Mae and BANA's motion for

18

summary judgment; and (b) Fannie Mae and BANA’s deadline to file a reply supporting their

19

motion for summary judgment.

20

…

21

…

22

…

23

…

24

…

25

…

26

…

27

…

28

…
2
46420401;1

1

8.

This stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.

2

DATED this 18th day of September, 2018.

3

AKERMAN LLP

BOYACK ORME & ANTHONY

4

/s/ Vatana Lay
MELANIE D. MORGAN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 8215
VATANA LAY, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 12993
AKERMAN LLP
1160 Town Center Drive, Suite 330
Las Vegas, NV 89144
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Bank of America,
N.A. and Federal National Mortgage
Association

/s/ Colli C. McKiever
EDWARD D. BOYACK, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 5229
COLLI C. MCKIEVER, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13724
401 N. Buffalo Drive #202
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Attorneys for Defendant Santa Barbara
Homeowners Association

5
6
7
8
9
10

AKERMAN LLP

1160 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 330
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89144
TEL.: [phone] – FAX: [phone]

11

KIM GILBERT EBRON

12

/s/ Diana S. Ebron
DIANA S. EBRON, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10580
JACQUELINE A. GILBERT, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10593
KAREN L. HANKS, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9578
7625 Dean Martin Drive, Suite 110
Las Vegas, Nevada 89139
Attorneys for Defendant SFR Investments
Pool I, LLC

13
14
15
16
17
18

ORDER

19
20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

23

September 18, 2018
DATED

24
25
26
27
28
3
46420401;1