Brown et al v. The Bank Of New York Mellon et al
Filing
16
ORDER Granting 10 Stipulation re 3 MOTION to Dismiss . IT IS ORDERED that the deadline for Plaintiffs to file their response to 3 the Motion to Dismiss is hereby extended to 1/3/17. The deadline for Defendant Bank of America to file its reply is hereby extended two (2) weeks based on the extended deadline for Plaintiffs to file their Opposition. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 1/4/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
4
5
BRYAN NADDAFI, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13004
OLYMPIA LAW, P.C.
9480 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite #257
Las Vegas, Nevada 89123
Telephone No. (702) 522-6450
Email: bryan@olympialawpc.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-02777-RFB-CWH
CLEVELAND BROWN, an individual; and
SANDRA BROWN, an individual;
Plaintiffs,
vs.
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, a
New York State chartered trust and custody
bank; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A; and ANY
PERSON OR ENTITY CLAIMING ANY
RIGHT, TITLE OR INTEREST IN OR TO
THE PROPERTY THE SUBJECT OF THIS
COMPLAINT TO QUIET TITLE,
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS’ DEADLINE TO
RESPOND TO BANK OF AMERICA’S MOTION TO DISMISS [SECOND
REQUEST]
Pursuant to LR IA 6-1 and LR 7-1, Defendant Bank of America and Plaintiffs
Cleveland Brown and Sandra Brown, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1. On December 5, 2016, the instant matter was removed from the Eighth Judicial
District of Nevada Court and assigned to Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware,
II and Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman.
2. On December 9, 2016, Defendant Bank of America filed its Motion to Dismiss
(ECF No. 3).
28
-1-
1
3. On December 21, 2016 Defendant Bank of America granted Plaintiff’s counsel’s
2
request to extend the time allowed for Plaintiffs to file their response to the
3
Motion to Dismiss to December 30, 2016 (ECF No. 8).
4
4. The Parties hereby stipulate and agree to extend time allowed for Plaintiffs to file
5
their response to the Motion to Dismiss to January 3, 2017. The reason for this
6
request is to accommodate the schedule of counsel for Plaintiffs.
7
5. The Parties hereby stipulate to a two (2) week extension for Defendant Bank of
8
America to file its reply to the response above the initial time allowed based on
9
the new Opposition Date.
10
DATED this 30th day of December, 2016.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
_/s/ BRYAN NADDAFI___
BRYAN NADDAFI, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13004
OLYMPIA LAW, P.C.
9480 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite #257
Las Vegas, Nevada 89123
Telephone No. (702) 522-6450
Email: bryan@olympialawpc.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DATED this 30th day of December, 2016.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
___/s/ DARREN BRENNER ___
DARREN BRENNER, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 8386
JESSE A. RANSOM, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13565
AKERMAN LLP
1160 Town Center Drive, Suite 330
Las Vegas, Nevada 89144
Telephone: (702) 634-5000
Facsimile: (702) 380-8572
Email: darren.brenner@akerman.com
Email: jesse.ransom@akerman.com
Attorneys for Defendant Bank of America,
N.A.
-2-
ORDER
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED:
3
The deadline for Plaintiffs to file their response to the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No.
4
3) is hereby extended to January 3, 2017. The deadline for Defendant Bank of America to
5
file its reply is hereby extended two (2) weeks based on the extended deadline for Plaintiffs
6
7
to file their Opposition.
IT IS SO ORDERED:
8
9
________________________________
Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman
__________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
DATED this ______day
United States District Judgeof December,
2016.
DATED this 4th day of January, 2017.
10
11
12
13
Respectfully Submitted by:
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
/s/ BRYAN NADDAFI
BRYAN NADDAFI, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13004
OLYMPIA LAW, P.C.
9480 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite #257
Las Vegas, Nevada 89123
Telephone No. (702) 522-6450
Email: bryan@olympialawpc.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?