Federal National Mortgage Association v. Warm Springs Reserve Owners Association et al

Filing 20

ORDER Granting 19 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Charles L. Geisendorf of Geisendorf & Vilkin is substituted in the place of Michael Bohn of the Law Offices of Michael F. Bohn for Defendant Ferrell Street Trust, subject to the provisions of LR IA 11-6(c) and (d). Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 8/7/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
    1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 8 FEDERAL NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 11 Case No. 2:16-cv-02829-JAD-PAL ORDER Plaintiff, 9 10 MORTGAGE (Subst Atty – ECF No. 19) v. WARM SPRINGS RESERVE OWNERS ASSOCIATION, et al. 12 Defendants. 13 This matter is before the court on the Substitution of Attorneys (ECF No. 19). Charles L. 14 Geisendorf of Geisendorf & Vilkin seeks leave to be substituted in the place of Michael Bohn of 15 the Law Offices of Michael F. Bohn, for Defendant Ferrell Street Trust. LR IA 11-6(c) provides 16 that the signature of an attorney to substitute in a case “constitutes an express acceptance of all 17 dates then set for pretrial proceedings, for trial or hearing, by the discovery plan, or in any court 18 order.” LR IA 11-6(d) also provides that the substitution of an attorney “shall not alone be reason 19 for delay of pretrial proceedings, discovery, the trial, or any hearing in this case.” 20 Having reviewed and considered the matter, 21 IT IS ORDERED that: 22 1. The Substitution of Attorney (ECF No. 19) is GRANTED. 23 2. Charles L. Geisendorf of Geisendorf & Vilkin is substituted in the place of Michael 24 Bohn of the Law Offices of Michael F. Bohn for Defendant Ferrell Street Trust, subject 25 to the provisions of LR IA 11-6(c) and (d). 26 DATED this 7th day of August, 2017. 27 PEGGY A. LEEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?