Etheridge v. Adventure Combat Operations, LLC
Filing
7
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall file its Certificate as to Interested Parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than March 17, 2017. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. on 03/10/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
10
11
12
MIRANDA ETHERIDGE,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
ADVENTURE COMBAT OPERATIONS, LLC, )
)
Defendant.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:16-cv-02834-JAD-GWF
ORDER
13
14
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s failure to file a Certificate as to Interested
15
Parties as required by LR 7.1-1. The Answer (ECF No. 6) in this matter was filed on February 17,
16
2017. LR 7.1-1 requires that pro se parties and attorneys for private non-governmental parties must,
17
upon entering a case, file a certificate as to interested parties, listing all persons, firms, partnerships or
18
corporations, known to have a direct, pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case, including the
19
names of all parent subsidiary, affiliate and/or insider of the named non-individual parties. If there
20
are no known interested parties, other than those participating in the case, a statement to that effect
21
must be filed. To date, Defendant has failed to comply. Accordingly,
22
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall file its Certificate as to Interested Parties, which fully
23
complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than March 17, 2017. Failure to comply may result in the issuance
24
of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed.
25
DATED this 10th day of March, 2017.
26
27
28
______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?