Etheridge v. Adventure Combat Operations, LLC

Filing 7

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall file its Certificate as to Interested Parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than March 17, 2017. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. on 03/10/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 9 10 11 12 MIRANDA ETHERIDGE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ADVENTURE COMBAT OPERATIONS, LLC, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:16-cv-02834-JAD-GWF ORDER 13 14 This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s failure to file a Certificate as to Interested 15 Parties as required by LR 7.1-1. The Answer (ECF No. 6) in this matter was filed on February 17, 16 2017. LR 7.1-1 requires that pro se parties and attorneys for private non-governmental parties must, 17 upon entering a case, file a certificate as to interested parties, listing all persons, firms, partnerships or 18 corporations, known to have a direct, pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case, including the 19 names of all parent subsidiary, affiliate and/or insider of the named non-individual parties. If there 20 are no known interested parties, other than those participating in the case, a statement to that effect 21 must be filed. To date, Defendant has failed to comply. Accordingly, 22 IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall file its Certificate as to Interested Parties, which fully 23 complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than March 17, 2017. Failure to comply may result in the issuance 24 of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. 25 DATED this 10th day of March, 2017. 26 27 28 ______________________________________ GEORGE FOLEY, JR. United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?