Cabebe v. Equifax Information Services, LLC

Filing 56

ORDER Denying 55 Stipulation to Extend Time re 42 MOTION to Compel (Oral Argument Requested), as the parties fail to explain how issues related to sealing impacted Equifax's ability to file a timely response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/13/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) Modified on correct disposition 10/13/2017 (ADR).

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-02866-RFB-NJK Document 55 Filed 10/12/17 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nev ada 89169 702.784 .5200 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Bradley T. Austin SNELL & WILMER, LLP 3883 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Tel: 702-784-5200 Fax: 702-784-5252 Email: baustin@swlaw.com Zachary A. McEntyre (admitted pro hac vice) Misty L. Peterson (admitted pro hac vice) KING & SPALDING LLP 1180 Peachtree Street, N.E. Atlanta, GA 30309-3521 Tel: 404-572-4600 Fax: 404-572-5100 Email: zmcentyre@kslaw.com mpeterson@kslaw.com Attorneys for Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA SHARON BARNUM, JERRY P. CABEBE, ROBERT SUSTRIK, and all similarly situated individuals, Plaintiffs, vs. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, 19 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:16-cv-02866-RFB-NJK STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR EQUIFAX TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL (FIRST REQUEST) 20 21 22 It is hereby stipulated by and between the parties, through their respective attorneys, that Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC’s (“Equifax”) time to file a response to Plaintiffs’ 23 Motion to Compel (filed on October 4, 2017, Dkt. No. 42) shall be extended from October 18, 24 2017, to October 25, 2017. 25 26 27 28 Good cause exists for this extension—namely, to allow Equifax additional time to prepare its response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel due to the recent issues with sealing certain exhibits to same (Dkt. Nos. 43-54). 4837-0956-4494 Case 2:16-cv-02866-RFB-NJK Document 55 Filed 10/12/17 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 This is the first stipulation for extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel. The stipulation is filed in good faith and is not intended to cause delay. Respectfully submitted this 12th day of October, 2017. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nev ada 89169 702.784 .5200 11 12 13 14 15 /s/ Matthew I. Knepper Matthew I. Knepper Miles N. Clark KNEPPER & CLARK, LLC 10040 W. Cheyenne Ave. Suite 170-109 Las Vegas, NV 89129 Email: matthew.knepper@knepperclark.com Email: miles.clark@knepperclark.com David H. Krieger HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC 8985 S. Eastern Avenue Suite 350 Henderson, NV 89123 Email: dkrieger@hainesandkrieger.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 /s/ Bradley T. Austin Bradley T. Austin SNELL & WILMER, LLP 3883 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Zachary A. McEntyre (admitted pro hac vice) Misty L. Peterson (admitted pro hac vice) KING & SPALDING LLP 1180 Peachtree Street N.E. Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3521 Bryan E. Zubay (admitted pro hac vice) KING & SPALDING LLP 1100 Louisiana Street, Suite 4000 Houston, Texas 77002-5213 Attorneys for Defendant EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC DENIED, as the parties fail to explain how issues related to sealing impacted Equifax's ability to file a timely response. IT IS SO ORDERED: ____________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE October 13, 2017 DATED: _________________ 23 24 25 26 27 28 -24837-0956-4494

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?