Cabebe v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
Filing
56
ORDER Denying 55 Stipulation to Extend Time re 42 MOTION to Compel (Oral Argument Requested), as the parties fail to explain how issues related to sealing impacted Equifax's ability to file a timely response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/13/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) Modified on correct disposition 10/13/2017 (ADR).
Case 2:16-cv-02866-RFB-NJK Document 55 Filed 10/12/17 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Snell & Wilmer
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nev ada 89169
702.784 .5200
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Bradley T. Austin
SNELL & WILMER, LLP
3883 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Tel: 702-784-5200
Fax: 702-784-5252
Email: baustin@swlaw.com
Zachary A. McEntyre (admitted pro hac vice)
Misty L. Peterson (admitted pro hac vice)
KING & SPALDING LLP
1180 Peachtree Street, N.E.
Atlanta, GA 30309-3521
Tel: 404-572-4600
Fax: 404-572-5100
Email: zmcentyre@kslaw.com
mpeterson@kslaw.com
Attorneys for Defendant Equifax
Information Services, LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
SHARON BARNUM, JERRY P. CABEBE,
ROBERT SUSTRIK, and all similarly situated
individuals,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES,
LLC,
19
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:16-cv-02866-RFB-NJK
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
EQUIFAX TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL
(FIRST REQUEST)
20
21
22
It is hereby stipulated by and between the parties, through their respective attorneys, that
Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC’s (“Equifax”) time to file a response to Plaintiffs’
23
Motion to Compel (filed on October 4, 2017, Dkt. No. 42) shall be extended from October 18,
24
2017, to October 25, 2017.
25
26
27
28
Good cause exists for this extension—namely, to allow Equifax additional time to prepare
its response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel due to the recent issues with sealing certain exhibits
to same (Dkt. Nos. 43-54).
4837-0956-4494
Case 2:16-cv-02866-RFB-NJK Document 55 Filed 10/12/17 Page 2 of 2
1
2
3
This is the first stipulation for extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion to
Compel. The stipulation is filed in good faith and is not intended to cause delay.
Respectfully submitted this 12th day of October, 2017.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Snell & Wilmer
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nev ada 89169
702.784 .5200
11
12
13
14
15
/s/ Matthew I. Knepper
Matthew I. Knepper
Miles N. Clark
KNEPPER & CLARK, LLC
10040 W. Cheyenne Ave.
Suite 170-109
Las Vegas, NV 89129
Email: matthew.knepper@knepperclark.com
Email: miles.clark@knepperclark.com
David H. Krieger
HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC
8985 S. Eastern Avenue
Suite 350
Henderson, NV 89123
Email: dkrieger@hainesandkrieger.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
/s/ Bradley T. Austin
Bradley T. Austin
SNELL & WILMER, LLP
3883 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Zachary A. McEntyre (admitted pro hac vice)
Misty L. Peterson (admitted pro hac vice)
KING & SPALDING LLP
1180 Peachtree Street N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3521
Bryan E. Zubay (admitted pro hac vice)
KING & SPALDING LLP
1100 Louisiana Street, Suite 4000
Houston, Texas 77002-5213
Attorneys for Defendant EQUIFAX
INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC
DENIED, as the parties fail to explain how issues
related to sealing impacted Equifax's ability to file a
timely response.
IT IS SO ORDERED:
____________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
October 13, 2017
DATED: _________________
23
24
25
26
27
28
-24837-0956-4494
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?