Cabebe v. Equifax Information Services, LLC

Filing 73

ORDER approving ECF No. 72 Stipulation re ECF No. 69 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Authority re ECF No. 42 Motion to Compel: Reply due by 11/29/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/22/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-02866-RFB-NJK Document 72 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Matthew I. Knepper, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12796 Miles N. Clark, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13848 KNEPPER & CLARK LLC 10040 W. Cheyenne Ave., Suite 170-109 Las Vegas, NV 89129 Phone: (702) 825-6060 Fax: (702) 447-8048 Email: matthew.knepper@knepperclark.com Email: miles.clark@knepperclark.com David H. Krieger, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9086 HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC 8985 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 350 Henderson, NV 89123 Phone: (702) 880-5554 Fax: (702) 385-5518 Email: dkrieger@hainesandkrieger.com Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 SHARON BARNUM, JERRY P. CABEBE, ) ROBERT SUSTRIK, and all similarly situated ) Case No. 2:16-cv-02866-RFB-NJK ) individuals, ) ) STIPULATION TO EXTEND Plaintiffs, ) PLAINTIFF’S DEADLINE TO FILE ) REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR vs. ) LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL ) EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, ) AUTHORITY REGARDING MOTION ) TO COMPEL Defendant. (First Request) PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), LR 7-1, and LR IA 6-2, the parties have stipulated to a two-day extension to for Plaintiffs to file their Reply in Support of Motion Leave to File Supplemental Authority regarding their Motion to Compel, attached hereto as Exhibit 1, The current deadline is November 27 and the new deadline shall be November 29. 23 24 25 1 Case 2:16-cv-02866-RFB-NJK Document 72 Filed 11/21/17 Page 2 of 3 1 The parties request this brief extension to provide time to comply with this Court’s Order 2 at ECF Dkt. 22. An expedited certified copy of Experian’s 30(b)(6) will not be available for re- 3 view until Wednesday, November 23, 2017. Certain passages of that transcript are subject to the 4 procedures this Court outlined in its Order. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 /s/ Matthew I. Knepper Matthew I. Knepper, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12796 Miles N. Clark, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13848 KNEPPER & CLARK, LLC 10040 W. Cheyenne Ave., Suite 170-109 Las Vegas, NV 89129 Email: matthew.knepper@knepperclark.com Email: miles.clark@knepperclark.com /s/ Zachary A. McEntyre Bradley T. Austin, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13064 SNELL & WILMER, LLP 3883 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Tel: 702-784-5200 Fax: 702-784-5252 Email: baustin@swlaw.com Zachary A. McEntyre (admitted pro hac vice) Misty L. Peterson (admitted pro hac vice) KING & SPALDING LLP 1180 Peachtree Street N.E. Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3521 Tel: (404) 572-4600 Fax: (404) 572-5100 Email: zmcentyre@kslaw.com Email: mpeterson@kslaw.com David H. Krieger, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9086 HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC 8985 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 350 Henderson, NV 89123 Email: dkrieger@hainesandkrieger.com 15 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 16 Bryan E. Zubay (admitted pro hac vice) KING & SPALDING LLP 1100 Louisiana Street, Suite 4000 Houston, Texas 77002-5213 Tel: (713) 276-7358 Fax: (713) 751-3290 Email: bzubay@kslaw.com 17 18 19 20 Attorneys for Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC 21 22 23 24 25 /// 2 Case 2:16-cv-02866-RFB-NJK Document 72 Filed 11/21/17 Page 3 of 3 1 Sharon Barnum and Robert Sustrik v. Equifax Information Services, LLC 2:16-cv-02866-RFB-NJK 2 3 4 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY REGARDING MOTION TO COMPEL 5 IT IS SO ORDERED: 6 7 ____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE United States Magistrate Judge 8 November 22, 2017 DATED: _________________ 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?