Cabebe v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
Filing
73
ORDER approving ECF No. 72 Stipulation re ECF No. 69 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Authority re ECF No. 42 Motion to Compel: Reply due by 11/29/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/22/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
Case 2:16-cv-02866-RFB-NJK Document 72 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Matthew I. Knepper, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12796
Miles N. Clark, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13848
KNEPPER & CLARK LLC
10040 W. Cheyenne Ave., Suite 170-109
Las Vegas, NV 89129
Phone: (702) 825-6060
Fax: (702) 447-8048
Email: matthew.knepper@knepperclark.com
Email: miles.clark@knepperclark.com
David H. Krieger, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9086
HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC
8985 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 350
Henderson, NV 89123
Phone: (702) 880-5554
Fax: (702) 385-5518
Email: dkrieger@hainesandkrieger.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
SHARON BARNUM, JERRY P. CABEBE, )
ROBERT SUSTRIK, and all similarly situated ) Case No. 2:16-cv-02866-RFB-NJK
)
individuals,
)
) STIPULATION TO EXTEND
Plaintiffs,
) PLAINTIFF’S DEADLINE TO FILE
) REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR
vs.
)
LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL
)
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, ) AUTHORITY REGARDING MOTION
) TO COMPEL
Defendant.
(First Request)
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), LR
7-1, and LR IA 6-2, the parties have stipulated to a two-day extension to for Plaintiffs to file their
Reply in Support of Motion Leave to File Supplemental Authority regarding their Motion to
Compel, attached hereto as Exhibit 1, The current deadline is November 27 and the new deadline
shall be November 29.
23
24
25
1
Case 2:16-cv-02866-RFB-NJK Document 72 Filed 11/21/17 Page 2 of 3
1
The parties request this brief extension to provide time to comply with this Court’s Order
2
at ECF Dkt. 22. An expedited certified copy of Experian’s 30(b)(6) will not be available for re-
3
view until Wednesday, November 23, 2017. Certain passages of that transcript are subject to the
4
procedures this Court outlined in its Order.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
/s/ Matthew I. Knepper
Matthew I. Knepper, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12796
Miles N. Clark, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13848
KNEPPER & CLARK, LLC
10040 W. Cheyenne Ave., Suite 170-109
Las Vegas, NV 89129
Email: matthew.knepper@knepperclark.com
Email: miles.clark@knepperclark.com
/s/ Zachary A. McEntyre
Bradley T. Austin, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13064
SNELL & WILMER, LLP
3883 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Tel: 702-784-5200
Fax: 702-784-5252
Email: baustin@swlaw.com
Zachary A. McEntyre (admitted pro hac vice)
Misty L. Peterson (admitted pro hac vice)
KING & SPALDING LLP
1180 Peachtree Street N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3521
Tel: (404) 572-4600
Fax: (404) 572-5100
Email: zmcentyre@kslaw.com
Email: mpeterson@kslaw.com
David H. Krieger, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9086
HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC
8985 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 350
Henderson, NV 89123
Email: dkrieger@hainesandkrieger.com
15
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
16
Bryan E. Zubay (admitted pro hac vice)
KING & SPALDING LLP
1100 Louisiana Street, Suite 4000
Houston, Texas 77002-5213
Tel: (713) 276-7358
Fax: (713) 751-3290
Email: bzubay@kslaw.com
17
18
19
20
Attorneys for Defendant Equifax
Information Services, LLC
21
22
23
24
25
///
2
Case 2:16-cv-02866-RFB-NJK Document 72 Filed 11/21/17 Page 3 of 3
1
Sharon Barnum and Robert Sustrik v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
2:16-cv-02866-RFB-NJK
2
3
4
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S DEADLINE TO FILE
REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL
AUTHORITY REGARDING MOTION TO COMPEL
5
IT IS SO ORDERED:
6
7
____________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
United States Magistrate Judge
8
November 22, 2017
DATED: _________________
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?