Cabebe v. Equifax Information Services, LLC

Filing 93

ORDER Granting 92 Stipulation for Extension of Time re: 91 Order. Joint Status Report due by 1/19/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/8/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-02866-RFB-NJK Document 92 Filed 01/08/18 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Matthew I. Knepper, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12796 Miles N. Clark, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13848 KNEPPER & CLARK LLC 10040 W. Cheyenne Ave., Suite 170-109 Las Vegas, NV 89129 Phone: (702) 825-6060 Fax: (702) 447-8048 Email: matthew.knepper@knepperclark.com Email: miles.clark@knepperclark.com David H. Krieger, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9086 HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC 8985 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 350 Henderson, NV 89123 Phone: (702) 880-5554 Fax: (702) 385-5518 Email: dkrieger@hainesandkrieger.com 13 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 SHARON BARNUM, JERRY P. CABEBE, ROBERT SUSTRIK, and all similarly situated individuals, Case No.: 2:16-cv-02866-RFB-NJK [PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PARTIES TO SUBMIT JOINT vs. STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ECF NOS. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, 82 & 91 Plaintiff, Defendant [SECOND REQUEST] The parties present this second and final Stipulation to Extend Time for the Parties to Submit Joint Statement Pursuant to this Court’s Orders at ECF Nos. 82 & 91. The current deadline 27 28 [PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PARTIES TO SUBMIT JOINT STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ECF NOS. 82 & 91[SECOND REQUEST] - 1 Case 2:16-cv-02866-RFB-NJK Document 92 Filed 01/08/18 Page 2 of 3 1 2 2018 pursuant to ECF No. 91 is Friday, January 12, 2017. The parties seek a seven-day extension to 2018 January 19, 2017. 3 4 5 6 7 8 In accordance with this Court’s Order at ECF No. 91, Equifax served its responses to Plaintiffs’ Requests for Admission, and First Supplemental Interrogatories and Requests for Production on December 29, 2017. Also in accordance with the Court’s Order, on January 5, 2018, the parties completed their LR 26-7 meet & confer efforts regarding the FIS Master Agreement and Equifax’s responses to Plaintiffs’ supplemental discovery requests. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 /// /// 27 28 [PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PARTIES TO SUBMIT JOINT STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ECF NOS. 82 & 91[SECOND REQUEST] - 2 Case 2:16-cv-02866-RFB-NJK Document 92 Filed 01/08/18 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Good cause exists for this final extension because it will provide the parties additional time to fully integrate into the Joint Statement their respective positions in light of the recent round of discovery responses and subsequent meet and confer. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: January 8, 2018 /s/ Matthew I. Knepper Matthew I. Knepper, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12796 Miles N. Clark, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13848 KNEPPER & CLARK LLC Email: matthew.knepper@knepperclark.com Email: miles.clark@knepperclark.com David H. Krieger, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9086 HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC Email: dkrieger@hainesandkrieger.com Bradley T. Austin, Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 13064 SNELL & WILMER LLP 3883 Howard Hughes Pkwy., Ste. 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Email: baustin@swlaw.com 17 18 19 20 Counsel for Equifax Information Services, LLC 21 22 24 25 26 Misty L. Peterson, Esq. Zachary A. McEntyre, Esq. KING & SPALDING LLP 1180 Peachtree Street NE Atlanta, GA 30309 Email: mpeterson@kslaw.com Email: zmcentyre@kslaw.com Counsel for Plaintiff 16 23 /s/ Zach A. McEntyre Bryan Zubay, Esq. KING & SPALDING LLP 1100 Louisiana, Ste. 4000 Houston, TX 77002 Email: bzubay@kslaw.com ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED _________________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE January 8, DATED this ____ day of _________ 2018 27 28 [PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PARTIES TO SUBMIT JOINT STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ECF NOS. 82 & 91[SECOND REQUEST] - 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?