Cabebe v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
Filing
93
ORDER Granting 92 Stipulation for Extension of Time re: 91 Order. Joint Status Report due by 1/19/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/8/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Case 2:16-cv-02866-RFB-NJK Document 92 Filed 01/08/18 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Matthew I. Knepper, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12796
Miles N. Clark, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13848
KNEPPER & CLARK LLC
10040 W. Cheyenne Ave., Suite 170-109
Las Vegas, NV 89129
Phone: (702) 825-6060
Fax: (702) 447-8048
Email: matthew.knepper@knepperclark.com
Email: miles.clark@knepperclark.com
David H. Krieger, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9086
HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC
8985 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 350
Henderson, NV 89123
Phone: (702) 880-5554
Fax: (702) 385-5518
Email: dkrieger@hainesandkrieger.com
13
14
Attorneys for Plaintiff
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
SHARON BARNUM, JERRY P. CABEBE,
ROBERT SUSTRIK, and all similarly situated
individuals,
Case No.: 2:16-cv-02866-RFB-NJK
[PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR
PARTIES TO SUBMIT JOINT
vs.
STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ECF NOS.
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, 82 & 91
Plaintiff,
Defendant
[SECOND REQUEST]
The parties present this second and final Stipulation to Extend Time for the Parties to
Submit Joint Statement Pursuant to this Court’s Orders at ECF Nos. 82 & 91. The current deadline
27
28
[PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PARTIES TO SUBMIT JOINT
STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ECF NOS. 82 & 91[SECOND REQUEST] - 1
Case 2:16-cv-02866-RFB-NJK Document 92 Filed 01/08/18 Page 2 of 3
1
2
2018
pursuant to ECF No. 91 is Friday, January 12, 2017. The parties seek a seven-day extension to
2018
January 19, 2017.
3
4
5
6
7
8
In accordance with this Court’s Order at ECF No. 91, Equifax served its responses to
Plaintiffs’ Requests for Admission, and First Supplemental Interrogatories and Requests for
Production on December 29, 2017.
Also in accordance with the Court’s Order, on January 5,
2018, the parties completed their LR 26-7 meet & confer efforts regarding the FIS Master
Agreement and Equifax’s responses to Plaintiffs’ supplemental discovery requests.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
///
///
27
28
[PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PARTIES TO SUBMIT JOINT
STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ECF NOS. 82 & 91[SECOND REQUEST] - 2
Case 2:16-cv-02866-RFB-NJK Document 92 Filed 01/08/18 Page 3 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Good cause exists for this final extension because it will provide the parties additional time
to fully integrate into the Joint Statement their respective positions in light of the recent round of
discovery responses and subsequent meet and confer.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: January 8, 2018
/s/ Matthew I. Knepper
Matthew I. Knepper, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12796
Miles N. Clark, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13848
KNEPPER & CLARK LLC
Email: matthew.knepper@knepperclark.com
Email: miles.clark@knepperclark.com
David H. Krieger, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9086
HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC
Email: dkrieger@hainesandkrieger.com
Bradley T. Austin, Esq.
Nevada State Bar No. 13064
SNELL & WILMER LLP
3883 Howard Hughes Pkwy., Ste. 1100
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Email: baustin@swlaw.com
17
18
19
20
Counsel for Equifax Information
Services, LLC
21
22
24
25
26
Misty L. Peterson, Esq.
Zachary A. McEntyre, Esq.
KING & SPALDING LLP
1180 Peachtree Street NE
Atlanta, GA 30309
Email: mpeterson@kslaw.com
Email: zmcentyre@kslaw.com
Counsel for Plaintiff
16
23
/s/ Zach A. McEntyre
Bryan Zubay, Esq.
KING & SPALDING LLP
1100 Louisiana, Ste. 4000
Houston, TX 77002
Email: bzubay@kslaw.com
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED
_________________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
January 8,
DATED this ____ day of _________ 2018
27
28
[PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PARTIES TO SUBMIT JOINT
STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ECF NOS. 82 & 91[SECOND REQUEST] - 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?