Nibarger v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Company et al
Filing
11
ORDER Granting 10 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 7 MOTION to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Responses due by 1/11/2017. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 1/4/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Case 2:16-cv-02869-JAD-PAL Document 10 Filed 01/04/17 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
DRUMMOND LAW FIRM, P.C.
Craig W. Drummond, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 11109
810 S. Casino Center Blvd., Suite 101
Las Vegas, NV 89101
T: (702) 366-9966
F: (702) 508-9440
Craig@DrummondFirm.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
10
11
810 S. CASINO CENTER BLVD., SUITE 101
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89101
DRUMMONDFIRM.COM
DRUMMOND LAW FIRM
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
KELLI NIBARGER, an individual,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE
)
INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation; )
IVAN GONZALEZ, an individual; J. ERIC
)
MORENO, an individual; and DOES I-V; and ROE )
CORPORATIONS VI-X, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
Case No.:
2:16-cv-02869-JAD-PAL
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND BRIEFING FOR PLAINTIFF
TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 7).
(First request)
KELLI NIBARGER (“Plaintiff”) and STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE
19
INSURANCE COMPANY, IVAN GONZALEZ, and J. ERIC MORENO (“Defendants”) stipulate
20
as follows:
21
22
23
1. On November 9, 2016, Plaintiff commenced an action in Nevada State Court, Eighth
Judicial District, entitled KELLI NIBARGER, an individual, Plaintiff, vs. STATE FARM
24
MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE
25
GONZALEZ, an individual; J. ERIC MORENO, a individual; and DOES I-V; and ROE
26
CORPORATIONS VI-X, inclusive, Defendants, as Case Number A-16-746440-C (the “Action”).
27
28
INSURANCE
COMPANY, a foreign corporation;
IVAN
2. On December 12, 2016, Defendants filed a Notice of Removal of the Action pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1332 with the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
Page 1 of 2
Case 2:16-cv-02869-JAD-PAL Document 10 Filed 01/04/17 Page 2 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
3. On December 12, 2016, Defendants completed the removal process by filing a
conformed copy of the Notice of Removal with the Eighth Judicial District Court.
4. On December 16, 2016, Plaintiff filed her Motion to Remand and Award Attorney’s
Fees and Costs (Doc. 5).
6
5. On December 20, 2016, Defendants’ response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand and
7
Award Attorney’s Fees and Costs was extended to January 6, 2017 via stipulation of the parties
8
9
10
11
and Order of this Honorable Court (Doc. 6 and Doc. 8, respectively).
6. On December 21, 2016, Defendants Ivan Gonzalez and J. Eric Moreno filed the instant
Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 7).
810 S. CASINO CENTER BLVD., SUITE 101
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89101
DRUMMONDFIRM.COM
DRUMMOND LAW FIRM
12
7. Due to the prior holidays, as well as the extension of time granted to the Defendants to
13
respond with their relevant opposition to Plaintiff’s prior motion, the Parties have agreed that the
14
15
16
17
time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be extended by one week, i.e.,
January 11 2017.
8. The Parties agree that this extension is not for an improper purpose or to delay these
18
proceedings.
19
Dated this 4th day of January, 2017.
Dated this 4th day of January, 2017.
DRUMMOND LAW FIRM, P.C.
HALL JAFFE & CLAYTON, LLP
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
/s/ Craig W. Drummond
/s/ Riley A. Clayton
By________________________________
By________________________________
CRAIG W. DRUMMOND
RILEY A. CLAYTON
Nevada Bar No. 011109
Nevada Bar No. 005260
810 South Casino Center Blvd., Suite 101
7425 Peak Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Las Vegas, Nevada 89128
Attorney for Plaintiff
Attorney for Defendants
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 4, 2017.
DATED this _________ day of January, 2017.
_______________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?