Rumbaugh et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company

Filing 10

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's punitive damages prayer is is dismissed with prejudice. And the parties have stipulated that the amount in controversy does not exceed $50,000, let alone the $75,000 jurisdictional thre shold for diversity jurisdiction, this case is REMANDED back to the Eighth Judicial District Court Case No. A-16-747133-C, Dept. IX, for participation in the Court Annexed Arbitration Program. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 5 the motion to dismiss is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is instructed to REMAND and CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 1/30/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Certified Copy of Order and Docket Sheet Sent to State Court - ADR)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-02873-JAD-NJK Document 9 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 3 ECF Nos. 5, 9 Case 2:16-cv-02873-JAD-NJK Document 9 Filed 01/30/17 Page 2 of 3 ORDER Based on the parties’ stipulation [ECF No. 9] to dismiss and remand, and Case 2:16-cv-02873-JAD-NJK Document 9 Filed 01/30/17 Page 3 of 3 good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s punitive damages prayer is is dismissed with prejudiced. And the parties have stipulated that the amount in controversy does not exceed $50,000, let alone the $75,000 jurisdictional threshold for diversity jurisdiction, this case is REMANDED back to the Eighth Judicial District Court Case No. A-16-747133-C, Dept. IX, for participation in the Court Annexed Arbitration Program. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to dismiss [ECF No. 5] is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is instructed to REMAND and CLOSE THIS CASE. ________________________________ ___________________ _ _ __ _ _ _ Jennifer Dorsey Dorsey r Dorsey sey U.S. District J d i i Judge 1 30 17 1-30-17 0

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?