Slobig, et al. v. Sonnenberg, et al.
Filing
118
ORDER. The Court ORDERS the parties to file a joint proposed discovery plan by 8/4/17. See Order for further motion deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/6/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
FRANK SLOBIG, et al.,
11
12
13
14
15
)
)
Plaintiff(s),
)
)
v.
)
)
ERIK GANTZ, et al.,
)
)
Defendant(s).
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:16-cv-02876-RFB-NJK
ORDER
16
On December 6, 2016, the claims against Defendants Gantz and Seed Consulting were severed and
17
transferred to this District. Docket No. 111. That order further indicated that Defendants could renew their
18
motion to dismiss after transfer to this District. Id. at 2. To date, no such motion has been filed.
19
Nonetheless, Defendants indicate in a joint status report that they intend to file such a motion. Docket No.
20
116 at 5. Without expressing any opinion herein, the Court ORDERS Defendants to file any such motion
21
by July 20, 2017.
22
Plaintiffs also reference filing a motion regarding service on Defendant Aragon, see Docket No. 116
23
at 5, but it is not clear from the docket that such a motion should be filed in this Court, see Docket No. 111
24
(severing and transferring the claims only against Mr. Gantz and Seed Consulting). To the extent Plaintiffs
25
believe this Court is the proper forum for such a motion, the Court ORDERS Plaintiffs to file such motion
26
explaining why that is so by July 20, 2017.
27
//
28
//
1
The Court further ORDERS the parties to file a joint proposed discovery plan by August 4, 2017.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
Dated: July 6, 2017
4
5
________________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?