Harris v. State of Nevada

Filing 77

ORDER. Once an attorney has made an appearance on behalf of a party, the party may not personally file any document with the court. LR IA 11-6. Harriss filing is a fugitive document not properly before the court. Accordingly, it shall be stricken. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Clerk of Court strike the Writ of Mandamus/Injunction ECF No. 76 . Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/13/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3 Tiyacte Harris,
4

Case No. 2:16-cv-02891-APG-DJA
ORDER

Petitioner,

5 v.
6 Natalie Wood, et al.,
7

Respondents.

8
9

This is a closed 28 U.S.C. § 2254 counseled habeas corpus case. Despite being

10 represented by counsel, Petitioner Tiyacte Harris has filed a “Writ of Mandamus/Injunction.”
11 ECF No. 76. Once an attorney has made an appearance on behalf of a party, the party may not
12 personally file any document with the court. LR IA 11-6. Harris’s filing is a fugitive document
13 not properly before the court. Accordingly, it shall be stricken.
14

I THEREFORE ORDER that the Clerk of Court strike the “Writ of Mandamus/Injunction”

15 [ECF No. 76].
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Dated: May 13, 2024
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE