Tamares Las Vegas Properties, LLC et al v. Travelers Indemnity Company

Filing 170

ORDER granting 169 Stipulation. Jury Trial reset for 1/25/2022 at 09:00 AM in LV Courtroom 6D before Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey. Calendar Call reset for 1/18/2022 at 01:30 PM in LV Courtroom 6D before Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey. Motions due by 12/ 27/2021. Exhibit List due by 1/18/2022. Proposed Jury Instructions due by 1/18/2022. Proposed Voir Dire due by 1/18/2022. Trial Briefs due by 1/18/2022. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 5/4/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 FORAN GLENNON PALANDECH PONZI & RUDLOFF PC Lee H. Gorlin Nevada Bar No. 13879 2200 Paseo Verde Parkway, Suite 280 Henderson, NV 89052 Telephone: (702) 827-1510 Facsimile: (312) 863-5099 Email: lgorlin@fgppr.com Gregory P. Varga (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) J. Tyler Butts (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) ROBINSON COLE LLP 280 Trumbull Street Hartford, CT 06103 Email: gvarga@rc.com jbutts@rc.com Attorneys for The Travelers Indemnity Company UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 13 14 15 TAMARES LAS VEGAS PROPERTIES, LLC; PLAZA HOTEL & CASINO, LLC; and T-UPR, LLC, 16 Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK 17 vs. STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CURRENT TRIAL DATES 18 THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, (Second Request) 19 20 21 Defendant. STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CURRENT TRIAL DATES 22 The parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to 23 continue the trial dates in this action as specified herein. This stipulation follows the Court’s 24 instructions from the April 8, 2021, Status Conference, in which the Court directed the parties to 25 “file a stipulation to continue the current trial dates.” (ECF No. 168). Of the Court’s available 26 dates noted during the status conference, the parties have conferred and agree on the date of 27 January 25, 2022, as a first option and February 8, 2022 as a second option for a new trial setting. 28 Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 169 Filed 04/28/21 Page 2 of 4 1 2 The parties have already participated in two settlement conferences and have submitted their joint pretrial order. (ECF No. 147), thus there is no need to continue those dates. 3 The Current and Proposed dates are as follows: 4 Current Date 1st Proposed Date Alternate Proposed Date Trial June 8, 2021 January 25, 2022 at 9:00 a.m. February 8, 2022 Deadline to File Motions in Limine May 10, 2021 December 27, 2021 January 10, 2021 Calendar Call - January 18, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. - January 18, 2022 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Trial Briefs Due noon) (by January 31, 2022 January 31, 2022 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Exhibit and Witness Lists Due (by noon) Proposed Jury Instructions and Voir Dire Questions Due (by noon) January 31, 2022 - January 18, 2022 - January 18, 2022 /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// -2- January 31, 2022 Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 169 Filed 04/28/21 Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 The Parties hereby request that the Court enter their 1st set of proposed dates. Alternatively, the Parties request that the Court enter the set of Alternative Proposed Dates. Respectfully Submitted by: Dated: April 28, 2021 Dated: April 28, 2021 DAVIS STIBOR FORAN GLENNON PALANDECH PONZI & RUDLOFF PC By: /s/ Shan Davis Shan Davis 10845 Griffith Peak Drive, Second Floor Las Vegas, NV 89135 / By: /s/ Lee H. Gorlin Lee H. Gorlin 2200 Paseo Verde Parkway, Suite 280 Henderson, NV 89052 WEG & MYERS Dennis T. D’Antonio Joshua L. Mallin Amanda Peterson 32 Duane Street, 2nd Floor New York, NY 10007 ROBINSON COLE LLP Gregory P. Varga J. Tyler Butts 280 Trumbull Street Hartford, CT 06103 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Defendant ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED that the parties 1st Set of Proposed Dates are approved. 17 18 19 _________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 20 21 22 23 5/4/2021 DATED: _____________________ 24 25 26 27 28 -3- /

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?