Tamares Las Vegas Properties, LLC et al v. Travelers Indemnity Company
Filing
170
ORDER granting 169 Stipulation. Jury Trial reset for 1/25/2022 at 09:00 AM in LV Courtroom 6D before Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey. Calendar Call reset for 1/18/2022 at 01:30 PM in LV Courtroom 6D before Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey. Motions due by 12/ 27/2021. Exhibit List due by 1/18/2022. Proposed Jury Instructions due by 1/18/2022. Proposed Voir Dire due by 1/18/2022. Trial Briefs due by 1/18/2022. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 5/4/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
FORAN GLENNON PALANDECH
PONZI & RUDLOFF PC
Lee H. Gorlin
Nevada Bar No. 13879
2200 Paseo Verde Parkway, Suite 280
Henderson, NV 89052
Telephone: (702) 827-1510
Facsimile: (312) 863-5099
Email: lgorlin@fgppr.com
Gregory P. Varga (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
J. Tyler Butts (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
ROBINSON COLE LLP
280 Trumbull Street
Hartford, CT 06103
Email: gvarga@rc.com
jbutts@rc.com
Attorneys for The Travelers Indemnity
Company
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
13
14
15
TAMARES LAS VEGAS PROPERTIES,
LLC; PLAZA HOTEL & CASINO, LLC; and
T-UPR, LLC,
16
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK
17
vs.
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
CURRENT TRIAL DATES
18
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY
COMPANY,
(Second Request)
19
20
21
Defendant.
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CURRENT TRIAL DATES
22
The parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to
23
continue the trial dates in this action as specified herein. This stipulation follows the Court’s
24
instructions from the April 8, 2021, Status Conference, in which the Court directed the parties to
25
“file a stipulation to continue the current trial dates.” (ECF No. 168). Of the Court’s available
26
dates noted during the status conference, the parties have conferred and agree on the date of
27
January 25, 2022, as a first option and February 8, 2022 as a second option for a new trial setting.
28
Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 169 Filed 04/28/21 Page 2 of 4
1
2
The parties have already participated in two settlement conferences and have submitted
their joint pretrial order. (ECF No. 147), thus there is no need to continue those dates.
3
The Current and Proposed dates are as follows:
4
Current Date
1st Proposed Date
Alternate Proposed
Date
Trial
June 8, 2021
January 25, 2022
at 9:00 a.m.
February 8, 2022
Deadline to File
Motions in Limine
May 10, 2021
December 27, 2021
January 10, 2021
Calendar Call
-
January 18, 2022 at
1:30 p.m.
-
January 18, 2022
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Trial Briefs Due
noon)
(by
January 31, 2022
January 31, 2022
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Exhibit and Witness
Lists Due
(by
noon)
Proposed Jury
Instructions and Voir
Dire Questions Due
(by noon)
January 31, 2022
-
January 18, 2022
-
January 18, 2022
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
-2-
January 31, 2022
Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 169 Filed 04/28/21 Page 3 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
The Parties hereby request that the Court enter their 1st set of proposed dates.
Alternatively, the Parties request that the Court enter the set of Alternative Proposed Dates.
Respectfully Submitted by:
Dated: April 28, 2021
Dated: April 28, 2021
DAVIS STIBOR
FORAN GLENNON PALANDECH PONZI &
RUDLOFF PC
By: /s/ Shan Davis
Shan Davis
10845 Griffith Peak Drive, Second Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89135
/ By: /s/ Lee H. Gorlin
Lee H. Gorlin
2200 Paseo Verde Parkway, Suite 280
Henderson, NV 89052
WEG & MYERS
Dennis T. D’Antonio
Joshua L. Mallin
Amanda Peterson
32 Duane Street, 2nd Floor
New York, NY 10007
ROBINSON COLE LLP
Gregory P. Varga
J. Tyler Butts
280 Trumbull Street
Hartford, CT 06103
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Attorneys for Defendant
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED that the parties 1st Set of Proposed Dates are approved.
17
18
19
_________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
20
21
22
23
5/4/2021
DATED: _____________________
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
/
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?