Tamares Las Vegas Properties, LLC et al v. Travelers Indemnity Company

Filing 217

ORDER Resolving Objections to Designated Deposition Testimony. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/14/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 1 of 51

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3 Tamares Las Vegas Properties, LLC, et al.,
4

Plaintiffs

5 v.

Case No.: 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK
Order Resolving Objections to
Designated Deposition Testimony

6 The Travelers Indemnity Company,
7

Defendant

8

In the joint pretrial order at pages 76–124, the parties provided their objections to

9 designated deposition testimony. 1 Attached are the court’s rulings on those objections, denoted
10 next to the objection in the appropriate line of the charts. O = overruled; S = sustained. Where
11 there is an indication that a portion of an objection was overruled or sustained, the parties should
12 presume that the remainder of that objection was contrarily overruled or sustained.
13

Whether addressed by these rulings or not, when presenting deposition testimony at trial,

14 counsel must:
15

•

Exclude the internal objections and any discussion about or response thereto; and

16

•

Exclude attorney-to-attorney colloquy.

17
_______________________________
U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey
March 14, 2022

18
19
20
21
22
23
1

ECF No. 147.

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 2 of 51

1

(f) Objections to Depositions:

2

(1) Defendant objects to Plaintiffs depositions as follows:

3

Witness Name

Page/Line
Start

Page/Line
End

Objection/Res12onse

Kevin Owens

6:8
12:15
16:25
18:3
29:12

8:10
15:17
17:13
27:19
33:16

36:3
45:24

44:12
103:21

No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
31:20-32:7 Hearsay (FRE 801
and 802)
No objection
49:5-49:18
Intenuption/commentary by
Plaintiffs' counsel
50:3-50:22
Intenuption/commentary by
Plaintiffs' counsel
61:12-62:1
Inte1TUption/commentary by
Plaintiffs' counsel
66:17 - 66:22
Inte1TUption/commentary by
Plaintiffs' counsel
69:21-69:25
IntelTllption/withdrawn
objection by Plaintiffs' counsel
70:14-70:15
IntelTllption/commentary by
Plaintiffs' counsel
71:19-72:2
Inte1TUption/commentary by
Plaintiffs' counsel
No objection

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

105:1

23
24
25

(

105:9

106:15

22

108:8

108:11
117:6

112:13
129:12

26
27
28
76

Improper Expert Opinion (FRE
702)
Speculation
117:11-120:21 Witness lacks
personal knowledge (FRE 602)
121:14-121:22 Witness lacks
personal knowledge (FRE 602)
121:17-121:22
Interruption/commentary by
Plaintiffs' counsel

D

s
s
s
s
s

s
0
0

0

0

s

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 3 of 51

1

Witness Name

Page/Line
Start

Page/Line
End

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

129:13
129:25
131:22
132:22

129:19
131:15
132:5
132:24

133:20
135:22
138:17
139:22
140:6

135:17
136:8
139:11
139:23
140:12

153:3
154:2
154:11
154:15
157:9
158:12
159:19
161:13

153:10
154:7
154:11
154:17
158:8
159:14
161:7
162:15

162:20

163:17

163:20
164:16

164:15
182:16

18
19
20
21

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

77

0 bjection/ResQonse
125:3- 125:4
Interruption/commentary by
Plaintiffs' counsel
125:14 -125:20
Interruption/commentary by
Plaintiffs' counsel
126:10 -126:17 Witness lacks
personal knowledge (FRE 602)
127:20 -127:21 Witness lacks
personal knowledge (FRE 602);
Speculation
128:15 -129:3
Interruption/commentary by
Plaintiffs' counsel
128:8- 128:14 Witness lacks
personal knowledge (FRE 602);
Speculation
Speculation
No objection
No objection
Incomplete answer, doesn't
include answer at 133:2-4.
No objection
No objection
No objection
Speculation
Improper answer in response to
coaching by Counsel; Witness
lacks personal knowledge (FRE
602);
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
Witness lacks personal
knowledge (FRE 602);
Speculation
Witness lacks personal
knowledge (FRE 602);
Speculation
No objection
164:16-165:10 Hearsay (FRE
801 and 802)

s
s
0

0

s
0

s

s

0

0

0

Witness Name

Page/Line
Start

Page/Line
End

Objection/Res12onse

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 4 of 51

2
3
4
5
6

4

7

s

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

182:19
183:4

183:1
183:15

183:20

191:4

191:19

191:23

191:25
192:3
192:20
193:22
194:14
196:14

192:1
192:11
193:14
194:4
196:9
197:7

197:21

198:7

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

167:23 - 167:24 Witness lacks
personal knowledge (FRE 602); D
Speculation
168:6 - 168:9 Witness lacks
personal knowledge (FRE 602) 0
170:16 - 171:4 Witness lacks
personal knowledge (FRE 602); C
Speculation; 0
Intem1ption/commentary by
Plaintiffs' counsel$: 1'1D; 19- \'1/:
171:13 - 171:20 Witness lacks
personal knowledge (FRE 602);
Speculation
174:14 - 174:19 Witness lacks
personal knowledge (FRE 602); 0
Speculation
176:6 - 176:7 Witness lacks
personal knowledge (FRE 602); D
Speculation
176:23 - 177:19 Improper
0
Expert Opinion (FRE 702);
Speculation
178:22 Witness lacks personal
0
knowledge (FRE 602);
Speculation
No objection
Witness lacks personal
0
knowledge (FRE 602);
Speculation
Witness lacks personal
knowledge (FRE 602);
Speculation
Witness lacks personal
knowledge (FRE 602);
0
Speculation
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
Witness lacks personal
knowledge (FRE 602);
Speculation
Witness lacks personal
0
knowledge (FRE 602);
Speculation

28
78

D

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 5 of 51

1
2
3
4

Witness Name

Page/Line
Start
198:9

Page/Line
End
198:14

200:2
202:24

200: IO
203:17

204:1
204:5
207:11
208:1
208:18
212:4
212:14

204:1
205:3
207:14
208:6
209:3
212:8
212:25

213:7
223:2

215:10
252:5

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

253:16
254:12
258:2
258:12
261:3
261:16
262:13
263:14
263:20

254:4
257:21
258:10
260:25
261:13
261:17
263: 10
263:15
263:23

265:14

266:4

266:8

266:12

26

266:18
267:3

266:20
267:19

27

268:6

268:18

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

28
79

Obiection/ResQonse
Witness lacks personal
knowledge (FRE 602);
Speculation
No objection
Witness lacks personal
knowledge (FRE 602);
Speculation
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
Witness lacks personal
knowledge (FRE 602);
Speculation
No objection
231:11 - 231:13 Witness lacks
personal knowledge (FRE 602);
Improper Expert Opinion (FRE
702); Speculation
234:10 - 234:21 F.R.E. 602
Witness lacks personal
knowledge (FRE 602);
Speculation
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
Witness lacks personal
knowledge (FRE 602);
Speculation
Witness lacks personal
knowledge (FRE 602);
Speculation
No objection
No objection
Relevance (FRE 402); Witness
lacks personal knowledge (FRE
602); Speculation

D
0

0

0

0

0
0

0

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 6 of 51
Witness Name
2
3
4

Page/Line
Start
274:7
275:18
276:2
277:24

Page/Line
End
275:13
275:19
276:7
326:7

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
80

Objection/ResQonse
Relevance (FRE 402)
Relevance (FRE 402)
Relevance (FRE 402)
278:4-278:14 Non-responsive
to question
279:6-279:10 Non-responsive
to question
279:2-279:24 Non-responsive
to question
280:2 - 280:3 Non-responsive
to question
281:11-281:16
Intem1ption/commentary by
Plaintiffs' counsel
293:2-293:13 Withdrawn
objections; Intem.1ption and
commentary by Plaintiffs'
counsel
299:14-300:13
Intem1ption/commentary by
Plaintiffs' counsel
301:9- 301:14
Interrnption/commentary by
Plaintiffs' counsel
302:10-302:18
Interrnption/commentary by
Plaintiffs' counsel
302:5-304:2 Relevance (FRE
402); Hearsay (FRE 801 and
802)
304:6-305:14
Interrnption/commentary by
Plaintiffs' counsel
304:15-307:6 Relevance (FRE
402)
307:11-311:12 Relevance
(FRE 402)
312:17 -315:19 Relevance
(FRE 402)
317:9-323 :2 Relevance (FRE
402)
323:3-323:22 Relevance (FRE
402)
324:3 -326:4 Relevance (FRE
402)

0

0
0

s
s
s
s

s
5

s

s

s
5

5

s
0

'O
0

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 7 of 51

Witness Name
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Douglas W.
Neumann

Page/Line
Start
8:19

Page/Line
End
9:5

9:10
11:3
12:8

10:6
12:2
13:19

14:20
16:16

16:10
17:8

17:19
18:15

18:7
22:12

9
10
11
12
13

22:21

23:6

14
15

23:25

24:15

16
17
18

24:24
25:19

25:2
26:9

26:14
28:11

27:9
29:13

30:10

31:3

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

33:8

35:2

35:9
37:1

35:12
37:11

28
81

Objection/ResQonse
No objection
No objection
No objection
Relevance (FRE 402) (as to
office location)
Leading (FRE 611)
Relevance (FRE 402) (as to
office location)
Leading (FRE 611)
Counsel is testifying (as to how
he would define "adjusting");
Speculation/Lack of Personal
knowledge (FRE 602); Counsel
is testifying (as to how he
"would imagine" how things
work); Misstates testimony (as
to "senior vice president")
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
testifying (as to his
"recollection");
Speculation/lack of personal
knowledge (FRE 602)
Attorney-Client Privilege (FRE
501); Leading (FRE 611);
Counsel is testifying (as to what
he imagines)
No objection
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
testifying (as to when the loss
was)
Leading (FRE 611)
Asked and answered (FRE
611(a)); Counsel is testifying
(as to what he "gather[s]")
Speculation/Lack of Personal
Knowledge (FRE 602); Leading
(FRE 611); Counsel is testifying
(as to what he "gather[s]");
Leading (FRE 611);
Speculation/Lack of Personal
Knowledge (FRE 602);
Compound
Missing questions and half of
the answer; Leading (FRE 611);
Counsel is testifying (as to what

0
0
0
0
0

0

0

()
0
0
0

0
0

0

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 8 of 51

Witness Name

Page/Line
Start

Page/Line
End

37:18
39:5

38:5
41:14

43:23

44:11

44:22

45:13

47:3
47:25

47:7
48:11

49:1

49:8

51:10

52:10

17

54:3

55:13

18

55:20

55:24

20

56:15

56:22

21

62:7

62:16

22

63:11

65:6

65:11

68:4

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

19

23
24
25
26
27
28
82

Objection/Res�onse
he imagines)
Vague; Leading (FRE 611)
0
Leading (FRE 611); Compound;
Speculation/Lack of Knowledge
-ff)
(FRE 602); Counsel is testifying
z3 as to what the witness said;
311:.
asked and answered (FRE
q; ,�.tf
61 l(a)
01\.''t'
Speculation/Lack of Personal
Knowledge (FRE 602); Counsel
is testifying (as to what he
gathers)
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
testifying (as to what he gets);
0
Compound; Counsel is
testifying (As to what he thinks)
No objection
Hearsay (FRE 801(c)); Best
0
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Leading (FRE 611)
Vague (as to the designated
portion of the first question);
Compound
Compound; Speculation/Lack of
Personal Knowledge (FRE
0
602); Leading (FRE 611)
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is .s
testifying; Compound;
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
testifying (as to what the
0
witness's job is)
Speculation/Lack of Personal
0
Knowledge (FRE 602)
Speculation/Lack of Personal
0
Knowledge (FRE 602)
Leading (FRE 611); Compound;
Argumentative;
Speculation/Lack of Personal
Knowledge (FRE 602); Hearsay
(FRE 801(c)); Best Evidence
(FRE 1001-FRE 1003)
Asked and Answered (FRE
61 l(a)); Leading (FRE 611);
Hearsay (FRE 801(c)); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Compound

s

s

3

s

s

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 9 of 51

Witness Name
2

Page/Line
Start
68:14

Page/Line
End
69:5

3
4
5
6
7

69:13

69:14

69:23

70:7

8
9
10
11
12

70:13

71:10

72:4

72:13

73:15

74:5

75:3

75:14

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

76:2

76:5

77:7

77:14

24
25
26

78:16

79:7

27
28
83

Objection/ResQonse
Counsel is testifying (as to what
he represents); Hearsay (FRE
80l(c)); Best Evidence (FRE
1001-FRE 1003); Counsel is
testifying (as to what he
imagines)
Leading (FRE 611); Hearsay
(FRE 80l(c)); Best Evidence
(FRE 1001-FRE 1003)
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
testifying (as wo what one item
is "sometimes refen-ed to as");
Hearsay (FRE 801(c)); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003)
Compound; Hearsay (FRE
80l(c)); Best Evidence (FRE
1001-FRE 1003)
Counsel is testifying (as to what
something "means"); leading
(FRE 611); Speculation/Lack of
Knowledge (FRE 602)
Counsel is testifying (as to what
something "means" and to what
he "know[s]"); Relevance (FRE
402) ( counsel admits that his
hypothetical is not the case
here); Leading (FRE 611)
Counsel is testifying (as to what
he would go to); Hearsay (FRE
801(c)); Best Evidence (FRE
1001-FRE 1003); Counsel is
testifying (as to what he
gathers)
Hearsay (FRE 801(c)); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003)
Counsel is testifying (as to what
the witness identified and
concluded); Leading (FRE 611);
Improper Lay Opinion (FRE
701 ); Argumentative
Speculation/Lack of Personal
Knowledge (FRE 602);
Improper Lay Opinion (FRE
701)

0
()
D

0

0

5
0

0

0
()

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 10 of 51

1
2

Witness Name

Page/Line
Start
80:2

Page/Line
End
80:8

81:16

82:6

3
4

6
82:16
83:1

82:19
84:6

84:10

85:16

85:20
87:1

86:13
88:24

16

89:5

89:13

17

89:17

90:5

90:9

91:3

91:9

92:1

92:6

92:24

27

93:21

93:25

28

94:13

94:21

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Speculation/Lack of Personal
Knowledge (FRE 602);
Improper Lay Opinion (FRE
701)
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
testifying (as to what the
witness can or cannot do and as
to what the witness can or
cannot know)
No objection
Vague (as to who was hired, to
0
whose credentials, and whose
findings); Leading (FRE 611)
Improper Lay Opinion (FRE
701); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003)
0
Leading (FRE 611)
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Leading (FRE 611); Lack of
Personal Knowledge (FRE
602); Improper Lay Opinion/
Ultimate Issue (FRE 701)
Improper Lay Opinion/
Ultimate Issue (FRE 701)
Hearsay (FRE 801(c)); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003);
Improper Lay Opinion/
Ultimate Issue (FRE 701);
Speculation (FRE 602)
Leading (FRE 611); Hearsay
(FRE 801(c)); Best Evidence
0
(FRE 1001-FRE 1003);
Improper Lay Opinion
/Ultimate
Issue (FRE 701)
Lack of Personal Knowledge
(FRE 602); Leading (FRE 611);
0
Hearsay (FRE 801(c)); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Improper Lay Opinion/
Ultimate Issue (FRE 701)
Improper Lay Opinion (FRE
0
701); Leading (FRE 611)
Asked and Answered (FRE
0

0

D

5

7

0 bjection/ResQonse

25
26

84

s

s
s

s

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 11 of 51

1

Witness Name

Page/Line
Start

Page/Line
End

99:6

99:22

2
3
4
5
6
7

100:1

100:14

101:16
103:12
103:20

10 l :24
103:14
104:12

104:23

105:24

106:4

106:9

106: 18

107:8

107:23
108:18
109:10

108:4
108:22
110:11

110:22
111:18

111:8
112:1

112:23
113:20
114:13
115:10

113:1
114:2
114:23
117:1

117:8

118:10

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

85

Objection/ResQonse
61l(a)); Leading (FRE 611);
Improper Lay Opinion (FRE
701)
Lack of Personal Knowledge
(FRE 602); Speculation (FRE
602); Leading (FRE 611);
Asked and Answered (FRE
61l(a)); Improper Lay Opinion
(FRE 701)
Leading (FRE 611); Hearsay
(FRE 801(c)); Best Evidence
(FRE 1001-FRE 1003)
No objection
No objection
Leading (FRE 611);
Speculation/Lack of Personal
Knowledge (FRE 602);
Foundation; Hearsay (FRE
80l(c))
Leading (FRE 611); Compound
Question; Asked and Answered
(FRE 61l(a)); Speculation/Lack
of Personal Knowledge (FRE
602); Foundation; Hearsay
(FRE 801(c)); Argumentative;
Speculation (FRE 602); Leading
(FRE 611)
Speculation/Lack of Knowledge
(FRE 602); Compound
Question; Leading (FRE 611)
No objection
Leading (FRE 611)
Leading (FRE 611); Assumes
Facts not in evidence;
Compound question
Leading (FRE 611)
Asked and answered (FRE
611(a)
Leading (FRE 611)
Leading (FRE 611)
Leading (FRE 611)
Lack of Personal Knowledge
(FRE 602); Speculation (FRE
602); Leading (FRE 611)
Attorney-Client Privilege (FRE
501); Lack of Personal

0
0

0

0

0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

0

0
0

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 12 of 51

Witness Name

Page/Line
Start

Page/Line
End

118:18

119:2

121 :4

122:5

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

122:21

123:9

125:10

125:19

128:12
130:13

128: 19
130:25

131:3

132:6

132:17

133:7

133:21

135:14

135:18
136:2

135:23
136:3

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

86

Objection/ResQonse
Knowledge/Speculation (FRE
602); Leading (FRE 611);
Attorney-Client Privilege (FRE
501); Lack of
Knowledge/Speculation (FRE
602); Leading (FRE 611);
Hearsay (FRE 801(c))
Leading (FRE 611); Improper
Lay Opinion (FRE 701);
Hearsay (FRE 80l(c)); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003)
Leading (FRE 611); Compound;
Hearsay (FRE 80l(c)); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003)
Speculation (FRE 602); Leading
(FRE 611); Asked and
Answered (FRE 61l(a));
Hearsay (FRE 80l(c)); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003)
Leading (FRE 611)
Leading (FRE 611); Hearsay
(FRE 80l(c)); Best Evidence
(FRE 1001-FRE 1003);
Compound
Leading (FRE 611); Improper
Lay Opinion (FRE 701);
Hearsay (FRE 801(c)); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Counsel is Testifying
Leading (FRE 611); Asked and
Answered (FRE 61l(a));
Hearsay (FRE 801(c)); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Compound; NonResponsive Answer
Lack of Personal Knowledge
(FRE 602); Speculation (FRE
602); Leading (FRE 611);
Hearsay (FRE 801(c)); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003)
No objection
No objection

0

0

0

s

j

s

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 13 of 51

Witness Name
2

Page/Line
Start
137:13

Page/Line
End
142:19

3
4
5
6
7
8

142:24

143:25

144:4

144:25

146:4

146:21

147:1

147:11

148:2

150:3

150:7

152:4

152:17

154:3

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

154:9

156:6
87

Objection/ResQonse
Relevance (FRE 402);
Attorney-Client Privilege (FRE
501); Speculation/Lack of
Knowledge (FRE 602); Leading
(FRE 611); Asked and
Answered (FRE 61 l(a));
Improper Lay Opinion (FRE
701); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Argumentative; Assumes
facts not in evidence
Leading (FRE 611); Hearsay
(FRE 801(c)); Best Evidence
(FRE 1001-FRE 1003)
Leading (FRE 611); Asked and
Answered (FRE 61 l(a));
Hearsay (FRE 801(c)); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003)
Answer lacks question;
Relevance (FRE 402);
Attorney-client privilege (FRE
501); Speculation/Lack of
Knowledge (FRE 602); Leading
(FRE 611);
Vague/Foundation; Leading
(FRE 611); Counsel is
Testifying
Speculation/Lack of Knowledge
(FRE 602); Leading (FRE 611);
Hearsay (FRE 801(c)); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Compound; Assumes
Facts not in Evidence;
Argumentative
Assumes facts not in evidence;
Speculation (FRE 602);
Argumentative; Leading (FRE
611); Counsel is Testifying;
Improper Lay Opinion (FRE
701)
Speculation/Lack of Knowledge
(FRE 602); Leading (FRE 611);
Asked and Answered (FRE
61 l(a)); Argumentative;
Argumentative; Speculation

5 a.,-b

o?t.l -

I 38 °
I '-/I� 17

f¼.s-i·. D

0

0

s
s
D

s
15
1
1

�,3
s-1---

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 14 of 51

1

Witness Name

Page/Line
Start

Page/Line
End

157:23

158:23

159:3

160:1

160:10

160:25

162:8

163:12

163:21

165:17

165:23

166:25

173:5

175:14

177:19

178:7

178:13

180:3

180:12

181:24

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
88

Objection/ResQonse
(FRE 602); Lack of Knowledge
(FRE 602); Leading (FRE 611);
Asked and Answered (FRE
61 l(a))
Leading (FRE 611); Improper
0
Lay Opinion (FRE 701);
Argumentative
Missing question; Attorneyclient privilege (501); Asked
0
and answered (FRE 61 l(a));
Leading (FRE 611);
Argumentative
Attorney-client privilege (FRE
501); Leading (FRE 611);
Vague
Speculation/Lack of Knowledge
I'l­
(FRE 602); Leading (FRE 611);
l�
Argumentative; Vague;
dCompound
Attorney-Client Privilege (501);
Speculation/Lack of Knowledge
(FRE 602); Leading (FRE 611);
Asked and answered (FRE
61 l(a)); Argumentative
Attorney-Client Privilege (FRE S;
/t.,b ·. ��
501); Speculation (FRE 602);
Argumentative; Irrelevant/Nono· '
Response as to Mr. Colburn
Leading (FRE 611);
Argumentative
Speculation/Lack of Knowledge
(FRE 602); Leading (FRE 611);
Improper Lay Opinion (FRE
701); Compound
Speculation/Lack of Knowledge
(FRE 602); Leading (FRE 611);
Improper Lay Opinion (FRE
701); Hearsay (FRE 80l(c));
Argumentative; Best Evidence
(FRE 1001-FRE 1003)
Attorney-Client Privilege (FRE
501); Speculation/Lack of
Knowledge (FRE 602); Leading
(FRE 611); Hearsay (FRE
801(c)); Best Evidence (FRE
1001-FRE 1003)

0

s

w­

s

s

5

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 15 of 51

Witness Name
2
3
4

Page/Line
Start
183:14

Page/Line
End
184:16

185:17

187:12

187:20

189:2

189:6

190:14

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

190:20

191:15

191:24

193:2

193:7

195:6

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

195:18

198:14

22
23
24
25

199:21

203:19

26
27
28
89

Objection/Res�onse
Leading (FRE 611); Assumes
Facts not in Evidence; Counsel
is testifying; Anrumentative
Leading (FRE 611); Assumes
Facts not in Evidence; Counsel
is testifying; Argumentative;
Hearsay (FRE 801(c)); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003)
Leading (FRE 611);
Argumentative; Improper Lay
Opinion (FRE 701); Hearsay
(FRE 801(c)); Best Evidence
(FRE 1001-FRE 1003)
Leading (FRE 611); Improper
Lay Opinion (FRE 701);
Argumentative; Hearsay (FRE
80l(c)); Vague
Attorney-Client Privilege (FRE
501); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003)
Leading; Speculation/Lack of
Knowledge (FRE 602);
Improper Lay Opinion (FRE
701); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Argumentative
Speculation (FRE 602); Hearsay
(FRE 801(c)); Best Evidence
(FRE 1001-FRE 1003);
Leading; Counsel is testifying;
Argumentative
Speculation (FRE 602); Lack of
knowledge (FRE 602); Leading
(FRE 611); Hearsay (FRE
801(c)); Argumentative;
Counsel is testifying; Cut off
response.
Lack of Knowledge (FRE 602);
Leading (FRE 611); Asked and
Answered (FRE 61l(a));
Improper Lay Opinion (FRE
701); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Counsel is testifying;
Compound; Argumentative;

s
s

s
s-,
l21c

�·

1tfo > J(J
I t.f

()

s
�

s·.

I q{;;

IZ.

�/

J-0: ('( s,

S:

BJ-O;J.' ,g
(;

l,!.o f:

[)J)J.'

5-

/ks}

: 1)

,er.

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 16 of 51

·witness Name

Page/Line
Start

Page/Line
End

204:1

204:19

205:2

208:3

208:11

211:4

211:25

212:13

212:21

123:11

213:18

214:8

214:15

215:10

215:15

216:25

217:15

218:13

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
90

Objection/ResHonse
Badgering; Assumes facts not in
evidence;
Leading (FRE 611); Hearsay
(FRE 80l(c)); Best Evidence
(FRE 1001-FRE 1003);
Argumentative
Speculation (FRE 602); Lack of
£
Knowledge (FRE 602); Leading �
(FRE 611); Hearsay (FRE
d- 0"1;'780l(c)); Argumentative;
,;1.oj:3
Counsel is Testifying;
Lacks knowledge (FRE 602);
D',
Leading (FRE 611); Asked and �
answered (FRE 61l(a)); Seeks
improper lay opinion/Legal
conclusion (FRE 701); Hearsay
(FRE 801(c)); Counsel is
testifying; Argumentative
Attorney-Client Privilege (FRE
501); Calls for
{)
Speculation/Lack of Knowledge
(FRE 602); Leading (FRE 611);
Attorney-Client Privilege (FRE
501); Calls for
Speculation/Lack of Knowledge
(FRE 602); Leading (FRE 611);
Argumentative; Asked and
Answered (FRE 611(a))
Attorney-Client Privilege (FRE
501); Calls for
Speculation/Lack of Knowledge
(FRE 602); Leading (FRE 611);
Argumentative
Speculation/Lack of Knowledge
(FRE 602); Leading (FRE 611);
Argumentative; Badgering
Attorney-Client Privilege (FRE
501); Speculation/Lack of
Knowledge (FRE 602); Leading
(FRE 611); Argumentative;
Asked and Answered (FRE
6 l l(a))
Lack of Direct Knowledge
(FRE 602); Leading (FRE 611);
Counsel is Testifying; Hearsay
(FRE 801(a)).

s

s

c,, .l,,-

0

s

0

91

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 17 of 51

1
2
3
4

\Vitness Name

Page/Line
Start
219:3

Page/Line
End
219:12

219:21

220:9

221:12

223:14

224:3

225:17

226:12

227:18

228:8

233:1

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

233:8

237:10

237:20

239:6

17
18
19
20
21
22

239:24
240:10

23
24
25
26
27
28

245:10

240:5
244:25

247:18

0 bjection/ResQonse
Lack of Direct knowledge (FRE
602); Leading (FRE 611);
Counsel is Testifying;
Lack of Direct knowledge (FRE
602); Leading (FRE 611);
Counsel is Testifying; Hearsay
0
(FRE 801(c)); Best Evidence
(FRE 1001-FRE 1003)
Lack of Knowledge/Speculation
(FRE 602); Leading (FRE 611);
{J
Hearsay (FRE 80l(c)); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003)
Speculation/Lack of Knowledge
(FRE 602); Leading (FRE 611);
Counsel is testifying; Improper Q
Lay Opinion (FRE 701)
Speculation (FRE 602); Leading 0
(FRE 611)
Argumentative; Speculation
(FRE 602); Leading (FRE 611);
Hearsay (810(c)); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Compound
"
Lack of Knowledge (FRE 602); 5"
Leading (FRE 611); Asked and ll_,J; ..:2 3Answered (FRE 61 l(a));
(i1
0' �7' lt)
Compound; Argumentative;
0.
t;fBadgering
Lack of Knowledge (FRE 602);
Leading (FRE 611);
Argumentative; Asked and
Answered (FRE 61l(a));
Counsel is Testifying
No objection
s�
Speculation/Lack of Personal
alt.I : s-,
Knowledge (FRE 602); Leading
��i � I I J
(FRE 611); Hearsay (FRE
80l(c)); Best Evidence (FRE
&.1 :
1001-FRE 1003); Counsel is
Testifying; Compound;
0,f). :-:.»
Argumentative;
Leading (FRE 611); Hearsay
(FRE 80l(c)); Counsel is
testifying;

0

0

0

'q

. ,.. I'+·

0

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 18 of 51

1

2

Witness Name
Brad Becker

Page/Line
Start
9:22

Page/Line
End
11:2

4
12: 1

15:22

6
7

0

8
9
10
11
12
13

18:4

24:5

25:16

30:11

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

22
23

Counsel is testifying (as to what
he thinks); Compound; Counsel
is testifying (as to what he
gathers); Misstates Testimony
(Becker Construction, not
Becker Consulting)
Foundation; Counsel is
testifying (as to what he
understands); Leading (FRE
611); Compound; Counsel is
testifying (as to what the
witness' job is); Counsel is
testifying (as to what he
imagines); Counsel is testifying
(as to what the witness' job is
again); Counsel is testifying (as
to that the witness is "doing");
Counsel is testifying (as to what
he imagines)
Compound; misstates testimony
(Becker is not an employee of
Young and Associates, he is an
independent contractor);
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
testifying (as to how the witness
advertises); Counsel is
testifying (as to what he
r'>'\
gathers); Counsel is testifying
\..__J
(as to what he imagines);
Hearsay (FRE 80l(c)); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Counsel is testifying
(literally reading evidence into
the record); Counsel is
testifying (literally reading
evidence into the record again)
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
testifying (as to what he
considers to be contaminates);
Compound; Counsel is
testifying (as to what he
knows); Counsel is testifying
(as to what he read); Counsel is
testifying (as to what the
witness does or does not recall);
Counsel is testifying (as to what

0

3

5

Objection/Res[!onse

24

D

25
26
27
28
92

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 19 of 51

1
2
3
4

Witness Name

Page/Line
Start

Page/Line
End

30:23
31:12
32:3

31:1
31:15
32:11

32:24

34:25

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

36:15

37:1

37:23

38:4

39:4

40:21

41:l

46:23

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

47:8

47:23

27
28

93

0 bjection/Res[!Onse
he imagines)
Compound
No Answer
No Foundation; Leading (FRE
611); Hearsay (FRE 80l(c));
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003)
Leading (FRE 611); Hearsay
(FRE 801(c)); Best Evidence
(FRE 1001-FRE 1003); Counsel
inserts commentary (as to what
is or is not self-evidence);
Compound; Counsel is
testifying ("providing some
answers")
Leading (FRE 611); Hearsay
(FRE 801(c)); Best Evidence
(FRE 1001-FRE 1003)
Vague (as to who "he" is);
Leading (FRE 611); Hearsay
(FRE 80l(c)); Best Evidence
(FRE 1001-FRE 1003)
Vague (as to "this purpose");
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
testifying (as to what he notices)
Vague/Compound; Counsel is
testifying (as to what he
imagines)(twice); Leading (FRE
611); Counsel is testifying (as to
the size of a room); Counsel is
testifying (as to how he knows
how water behaves); Calls for a
nan-ative response; Counsel is
testifying (as to the possession
of videos); Counsel is testifying
(as to the description of water
flow as "Niagara Falls");
Counsel is testifying (as to
whether a fact is disputed);
Asked and Answered (FRE
6ll(a))
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
testifying (as to how a section of
the hotel is refe1Ted and what
amenities are/were available in
that section); Argumentative;

C
s.

a
0
0

0

s '{hit

�1 lo '. 'd �
I./ (ii; IS'
Or' ci

s

;<"flC".£
L-17:1�
ll 7,J.O

fu,"' ''p. r<cl I
do"°-t"
fl)

'ac l r<> � led�l

c,.--lj I

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 20 of 51

1

Witness Name

Page/Line
Start

Page/Line
End

48:19

48:24

50:20

51:13

51:21

53:25

54:7

59:20

60:4

61:11

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

20

22

61:17
62:14

61:23
63:3

63:8

70:3

23
24

Counsel is testifying (as to what
he thinks)
Counsel is testifying (as to what
was beneath the pool deck);
,r""
Compound; Leading (FRE 611); ,___)
Vague (as there does not appear
to even be a question)
Counsel is testifying (telling the
-, "r°""'i
witness what parts of the hotel
5"\ .. �­
are called); Counsel is testifying
,;-t;1
(as to which portions of the
�tom ''�o t�"
c''
hotel are forgotten); Leading
,\,o ':S�
(FRE 611)
C)(l;J
Speculation/ Lack of Personal
Knowledge (FRE 602); Counsel
is testifying (as to features of
the property); Leading (FRE
611); Final question is cut-off
and no response designated
Speculation I Lack of Personal
Knowledge (FRE 602); Leading
55,J(r
(FRE 611); Counsel is testifying
s5:11
fi-om -·A � I�'
(as to what the witness would
have done); Compound;
-1<>
"bcJf"
°'"''6
Counsel is testifying (as to his
5fo; 1 0-,;:.:ii
review of reports); Hearsay
(FRE 801(c)); Best Evidence -fr�''A,� t'rt\'I,�,
\.:,'\'ilpC>S�o,
(FRE 1001-FRE 1003)
o,("J
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
testifying (as to whether the
r7'>\
witness is right or wrong);
counsel is testifying (as to how
walls may be dried); Foundation
Leading (FRE 611)
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
testifying (as to what he is
saying); Vague (as to which
estimate counsel is refen-ing to)
Speculation/ Lack of Personal
Knowledge (FRE 602); Leading
(FRE 611); Hearsay (FRE
801(c)); Best Evidence (FRE
1001-FRE 1003); Compound;
Counsel is testifying (as to what
the document does or does not
say); Counsel is testifying

S

0

S , " -,,.;.

V

19

21

Objection/Response

25
26
27
28
94

O

0

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 21 of 51
Witness Name

Page/Line
Start

Page/Line
End

70:18

72:16

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

73:20

76:15

11
12
13
14
15

77:6

79:15

16
17
18
19
20

80:8

82:21

21
22
23
24

83:3

84:8

84:22

90:17

25
26
27
28
95

Objection/ResQonse
(quoting the document on
multiple occasions); Assumes
facts no in evidence;
Argumentative; Foundation
Speculation/ Lack of Personal
Knowledge (FRE 602); Missing
part of the question; Leading
(FRE 611); Compound; Counsel
is testifying (as to what
influenced the witness'
investigation); Counsel is
testifying (as to what he
understands)
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
testifying (as to the witness'
job); Best Evidence (FRE 1001FRE l003); Hearsay (FRE
801(c)); Counsel is testifying
(as to what he imagines);
Compound; Speculation/ Lack
of Personal Knowledge (FRE
602); No designated response to
the final question
Answer without a question;
Vague (who was talking to the
witness); Call for hearsay (FRE
80l(c)); Compound; Leading
(FRE 611); Counsel is testifying
(as to what would happen);
Speculation/ Lack of Personal
Knowledge (FRE 602)
Compound; Leading (FRE 611);
Counsel is testifying (as to what
he understands); Counsel is
testifying (as to what the
witness could have done);
Asked and answered (FRE
61 l(a))
Beginning of question is cut off;
Compound; Speculation/ Lack
of Personal Knowledge (FRE
602); Leading (FRE 611);
Counsel is testifying (as to what
he imagines);
Leading (FRE 611); Compound;
Speculation/ Lack of Personal

!'
u

0
c)

0

0

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 22 of 51

1

Witness Name

Page/Line
Start

Page/Line
End

91: 1

91:25

2
3
4
5
6
7

94:5

94:25

C>

10
11
12

95:14

97:16

100:5

100:11

104:2

105:5

13
14
15
16
17

19
20

22

105:19

109:5

112:10

112: 19

23
24
25
26
27

(1

C

C

18

21

s

Knowledge (FRE 602); Counsel
11 1'...+
is testifying ( as to what was or
87..\7was not impacted); Counsel is
tZ.. �
testifying (as to what "we
(.)l\\j
know); Argumentative; Counsel
is testifying (as to the existence
of reports and that he has seen
them)
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Question without an answer;
'--""
Leading (FRE 611)
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
testifying (as to what he
gathers); Compound; Counsel is
literally reading the document
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 80l(c));
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
reading the document.
Leading (FRE 611); Vague (as
to who asked the witness to
inspect the roof)
Compound; Counsel is
testifying (as to what the
witness said); Counsel is
testifying (as to what he
gathers); Leading (FRE 611);
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Counsel is reading a document
into evidence
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 80l(c));
Compound; Leading (FRE 611);
Argumentative; Asked and
Answered (61 l(a)); Counsel is
testifying (as to what the
witness is identifying); Counsel
is testifying (as to what the
witness was doing)
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Speculation (FRE 602)

f'D

8
9

Objection/Res�onse

28
96

0

0

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 23 of 51

'Witness Name
2

Page/Line
Start
113:5

Page/Line
End
118:10

118:25

119:17

122:3
123:1

122:18
132:22

129:12

130:5

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

15
130:23

132:1

17

132:19

136:16

137:10

138:3

20
21
22
23
24
25
26

10

C

0

18
19

Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Speculation/ Lack of Personal
Knowledge (FRE 602);
Compound; Leading (FRE 611); I'\
Counsel is testifying (as to what '---"
the witness wrote [multiple
times]); Asked and answered
(FRE 611(a));
Best Evidence (FRE l001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 80l(c));
Leading (FRE 611)
Beginning of question is cut off 0
Beginning of question is cut off;
Counsel is testifying (as to the
date of the photos); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003)
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Leading (FRE 611);
Speculation (FRE 602); Counsel
is testifying (final question has
no answer designated and is
really just a description by
counsel)
Leading (FRE 611); Speculation
/ Lack of Personal Knowledge
(FRE 602); Counsel is testifying
(as to what the witness would
have done)
Leading (FRE 611); Speculation
/ Lack of Personal Knowledge
(FRE 602); Argumentative;
Asked and Answered (61l(a));
Counsel is testifying (as to
whether water conducts
electricity, whether water rusts
metals, and whether rust and
corrosion are not good); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003)
Leading (FRE 611); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Counsel is testifying (as
to what the photo depicts)

C)

14

16

Objection/Res�onse

27
28
97

0

8

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 24 of 51

1
2

·witness Name

Page/Line
Start
140:7

Page/Line
End
141:2

141:17

142:19

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

143:16

144:1

144:10

144:22

145:6

147:15

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

148:5

149:20

151:13
153:2

151:16
153:7

155:4

156:18

156:25

157:13

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
98

Objection/ResQonse
Leading (FRE 611); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Argumentative;
Speculation/ Lack of Personal
Knowledge (FRE 602)
Leading (FRE 611); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Argumentative; Counsel
is testifying (as to what was or
was not affected); Speculation/
Lack of Personal Knowledge
(FRE 602); Counsel is testifying
(as to what is in the photo)
Vague (as to what counsel is
referring to); Leading (FRE
611); Best Evidence (FRE
1001-FRE 1003); Hearsay (FRE
80l(c))
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003)
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 80l(c));
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
testifying (as to what the photo
depicts); Speculation/ Lack of
Personal Knowledge (FRE
602); Counsel is testifying (as to
what he gathers)
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
testifying (as to where the wet
ceilings were contained to)
Vague; Leading (FRE 611)
Vague; Assumes facts not in
evidence; Compound
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
testifying (as to what his
takeaway is)
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 80l(c));
Speculation/ Lack of Personal
Knowledge (FRE 602); Leading
(FRE 611); Counsel is testifying
(as to what constitutes good
news)

C
C
0
0

0
0
'5

0

0
0

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 25 of 51

\,Vitness Name
2

Page/Line
Start
157:20

Page/Line
End
158:24

3
4
5
6
7

159:5

163:20

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

165:11

165:19

166:7

167:7

15
16
17
18
19
20

167:14

169:18

169:24

171:9

171:19

174:10

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
99

Objection/ResQonse
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Compound; Leading (FRE 611);
Counsel is testifying (reading an
email into the record); Counsel
is testifying (as to what the
witness knows); Speculation/
Lack of Personal Knowledge
(FRE 602)
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 80l(c));
Leading (FRE 611); Speculation
/ Lack of Personal Knowledge
(FRE 602); Counsel is testifying
(as he is both reading and
spelling the report into the
record); Compound;
Foundation; Counsel is
testifying (as to what he
gathers)
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 80l(c));
Counsel is testifying (as to what
he was reading)
Asked and answered (61l(a));
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Speculation/ Lack of Personal
Knowledge; Foundation; Vague
(as to whom Counsel is
referring)
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 80l(c));
Leading (FRE 611); Speculation
/ Lack of Personal Knowledge
(FRE 602); Compound; Counsel
is testifying (as to what
someone is doing)
Leading (FRE 611); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Asked and answered (FRE
61l(a))
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Counsel is testifying (as to what

8

0

0

Q
0

0
CJ

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 26 of 51

Page/Line
Start

Page/Line
End

175:11

Witness Name

181:4

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
183:1

183:5

184:13

9

186:9

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

186:16

191:20

4:9

4:14

5:17
10:9
11: 11
12:5
14:1
17:5
18:9

5:22
10:15
11:23
13:13
16:14
17:21
19:4

19:24

20:6

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Wade
Ledbetter

100

Objection/ResQonse
he was reading); Speculation/
Lack of Personal Knowledge
(FRE 602); Arn:umentative
Counsel is testifying (as to what
the document is); Best Evidence
(FRE 1001-FRE 1003); Hearsay
(FRE 80 l (c)); Compound;
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
testifying (reading the
document); Speculation/ Lack
of Personal Knowledge (FRE
602)
Vague (as to what type of
abatement he is referring to);
argumentative; leading (FRE
611)
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Counsel is testifying (as
to what he believes); Leading
(FRE 611); Hearsay (FRE
80l(c)); Counsel is testifying
(as to what the witness' goal is);
Argumentative; No designated
answer to final narrative
question
Vague (as to what was being
referred to); leading (FRE 611);
Counsel is testifying (as to what
the witness' point is); Hearsay
(FRE 801(c)); Best Evidence
(FRE 1001-FRE 1003); Leading
(FRE 611)
Relevance (FRE 402); Not a
Question
None
None
None
None
Leading (FRE 611)
Leading (FRE 611); Vague
Leading (FRE 611); Lack of
Personal Information (FRE
602);
Leading (FRE 611); Compound;
Counsel is testifying (as to an

0
C

0

0
0

0
0

()

Witness Name

Page/Line
Start

Page/Line
End

26:16
31:22
33:23
34:16

30:13
32:21
34:6
36:11

36:22

36:25

38:7

38:15

40:1

40:2

42:14

43:12

45:18
47:16

46:11
48:14

49:1

49:14

49:22
50:24
53:13
54:6
55:9

50:14
52:6
53:18
54:15
56:5

57:23

58:2

60:14

62:4

Objection/ResQonse

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 27 of 51

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

101

adjuster's responsibility)
None
None
None
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
testifying (as to what he knows)
Asked and answered (FRE
61 l (a)); Leading (FRE 611)
*Subject to Stipulated
Protective Order
*Subject to Stipulated
Protective Order; Vague (no
designated question to be
answered)
*Subject to Stipulated
Protective Order; Leading (FRE
611)
Leading (FRE 611); Compound
Vague (no designated question
to be answered); Leading (FRE
611)
Speculation/ Lack of Personal
Knowledge (FRE 602); Vague
(as to what physical inspection);
Leading (FRE 611)
Leading (FRE 611)
Leading (FRE 611)
Leading (FRE 611); Compound
Leading (FRE 611)
Counsel is testifying (As to
what he has seen); Vague (not
clear what counsel is asking);
foundation; Speculation/ Lack
of Knowledge (FRE 602);
Unanswered question
Counsel is testifying (as to what
he has read); Hearsay (FRE
801(c)); Best Evidence (FRE
1001-FRE 1003); Leading (FRE
611)
Leading (FRE 611); Asked and
Answered (FRE 61 l(a));
Compound; Speculation/ Lack
of Personal Knowledge (FRE
602)

0

s
0

0

0
0

0

0

s

0
0

s
0

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 28 of 51

Witness Name
2

Page/Line
Start
65:16

Page/Line
End
66:12

66:25
69:9

67:4
69:20

72:20
74:9

73:12
74:14

75:2

75:8

84:10
90:19

84:24
93:5

94:1

94:22

97:21
99:3

98:1
99:11

100:14

101:13

105:15

105:23

106:10

107:2

115:12

115:21

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
102

Objection/Res�onse
Designation omits initial
question; Designation omits half
of the answer; Leading (FRE
611); Lack of Personal
Knowledge (FRE 602);
Foundation; Assumes facts not
in evidence; Speculation (FRE
602)
None
Compound; Leading;
Speculation/ Lack of Personal
Knowledge (FRE 602)
Vague (as to the period of time)
Vague (as to the time of
reference)
Vague (as to who received the
assignment); Lack of Personal
Knowledge (FRE 602)
Compound
Asked and answered (FRE
61 l(a)); Counsel is testifying
(as to what the witness said);
Counsel is testifying (as to what
he imagines);
Vague (as to who's visit is
being refened); Speculation/
Lack of Personal Knowledge
(FRE 602)
Speculation
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
testifying (as to his
understanding of the value of
the loss)
Counsel is testifying (as to what
he knows); Leading (FRE 611);
Compound; Counsel is
intenupting the witness
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
interrupting the witness
Compound; Leading (FRE 611);
Speculation/ Lack of Personal
Knowledge (FRE 602)
Counsel is testifying (as to what
he imagines); Leading (FRE
611)

0
0
0

0
0

0
0
0

0

0
s

0

0

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 29 of 51

Witness Name
2

Page/Line
Start
116:5

Page/Line
End
116:18

3
4
5
117:1
122:22

117:8
123:11

9

125:2

125:8

10

125:17

128:5

6
7
8

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

132:3

132:12

132:21
136:20

133:1
137:6

137:22

139:20

19
20
21
22
23

140:19

141:10

143:5

145:14

148:12

148:20

149:7

150:24

24
25
26
27
28
I 03

Objection/Res[!onse
Speculation/ Lack of Personal
Knowledge (FRE 602);
Argumentative; Asked and
Answered (FRE 61 l(a));
Foundation; Leading (FRE
611); Counsel is testifying (as to
what the number should be)
Compound; Leading (FRE 611)
Counsel is testifying (as to what
the witness said); Asked and
answered (FRE 61 l(a));
Compound
Compound; Part of the answer
is missing from the designation
Vague (as to who the witness
was speaking to); Leading (FRE
611); Counsel is testifying (as to
what the witness might have
said); Counsel is testifying (As
to what he gathers); Counsel is
testifying (as to what he
thought)
Vague (as to whose assignment
counsel is referring)
None
Counsel is testifying (as to what
he gathers)
Counsel is testifying (as to what
he saw); Counsel is guessing at
figures; Speculation/ Lack of
Knowledge (FRE 602); Leading
(FRE 611); Compound
Compound; Argumentative;
Asked and Answered (FRE
61 l(a)); Leading (FRE 611)
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Leading (FRE 611); Speculation
/ Lack of Personal Knowledge
(FRE 602)
Best Evidence (FRE l 001-FRE
1003)
Leading (FRE 611); Improper
Lay Opinion (FRE 701); Vague
(as to the wording of the
question on 150:17-20);

0
0

0

0

0
0
0
1

{f' l

.

0

s

""

c..✓.\­
i
150: Ii
_,g)·.Z.�

Ov'l\d

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 30 of 51

Witness Name

Page/Line
Start

Page/Line
End

151:6

152:19

153:12

153:15

157:17

159:1

2
3
4
5
6
7

10
11
12
13
14

159:14

160:1

162:13

162:25

163:13

163:21

165:8

165:13

167:9

170:2

170:12

172:10

173:21

173:25

174:5

175:19

176:11

178:9

179:5

179: 19

15
16
17
18
19
20
21

22
23
24
25
26
27

Counsel is testifying (as to what
the answer should be)
Leading (FRE 611); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Attorney-Client Privilege
(FRE 501)
Speculation/ Lack of Personal
0
Knowledge (FRE 602)
Speculation/ Lack of Personal
Knowledge (FRE 602); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Leading (FRE 611);
Hearsay (FRE 801(c))
Compound; Best Evidence
(FRE 1001-FRE 1003); Hearsay
(FRE 801(c))
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 801(c))
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Leading (FRE 611)
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Leading (FRE 611)
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 80l(c));
Leading (FRE 611); Compound;
Argumentative
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Leading (FRE 611); Compound;
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Leading (FRE 611); Compound;
Speculation/ Lack of Personal
Knowledge (FRE 602);
; " ,�,,., tBest Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE C
-J f"T1 ;'',
1003); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
..,.,._,,..,
Leading (FRE 611); Speculation
111 ·.ltf
/ Lack of Personal Knowledge
l,( '",
J
(FRE 602); Compound
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 80l(c));

0

0

8
9

0 bjection/ResQonse

28
104

0

0

0

C)

0

0

0

0

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 31 of 51

1

Witness Name

Page/Line
Start

Page/Line
End

180:3

181:20

182:2

182:3

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

182:16

183:15

184:24

186:21

187:7

187:10

187:25

189:22

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

190:6

191 :22

196:14

198:2

22
23
24
25
26
27

199:11

199:23

28
105

Objection/Res:Qonse
Leading (FRE 611); Asked and
answered (FRE 61 l(a));
Compound
Compound; Speculation (FRE
602); Argumentative; Leading
(FRE 611); Best Evidence (FRE
1001-FRE 1003); Hearsay (FRE
801(c));
Question without an answer;
Hearsay (FRE 801(c)); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Counsel is testifying (as
to what someone said); Vague
(as to who said it)
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Leading (FRE 611); Compound;
Argumentative
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Leading (FRE 611); Speculation
/ Lack of Personal Knowledge
(FRE 602)
Leading (FRE 611); Vague (as
to who was reporting and what
that person was reporting)
Foundation; Leading (FRE
611); Argumentative;
Badgering; Counsel is
interrupting the witness;
Attorney-Client Privilege (FRE
501).
Argumentative; Leading (FRE
611); Attorney-Client Privilege
(FRE 501); Hearsay (FRE
80l(c))
Compound; Asked and
answered (FRE 611 (a)); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Argumentative;
Badgering; Leading (FRE 611);
Counsel is Testifying
Attorney-Client Privilege (FRE
501)

0
0
0

0

s

s

;" r"' '�

1<1f -1-

\�:5,
\

� ... : �

l'l� 1'1

s
s

Dr:

i0 Frl

l'l 1, '7/"THO

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 32 of 51

1
2
3
4
5
6

Witness Name

Page/Line
Start
202:2

Page/Line
End
202:5

204:5

204:10

211:3

212:1

7
8

212:1

213:15

9
10
11
12
13
14

213:19

214:21

214:25

215:2

216:5

216:8

216:13

217:4

219:2

219:4

219:13

221:3

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
106

Objection/Res�onse
Not a question, not an answer;
Statement of Defending
Counsel; Not evidence
Not a question, not an answer;
Statement of Deposing Counsel;
Not evidence
Leading (FRE 611);
Argumentative; Hearsay (FRE
50l(c)); Counsel is testifying
and drawing conclusions;
Deposing Counsel is trying to
instrnct the Witness how to
answer; Best Evidence (FRE
1001-FRE 1003); Hearsay
(FRE 80l(c)); Leading (FRE
611 ); Argumentative; Counsel
is testifying (As to what the
author was addressing);
Speculation/ Lack of Personal
Knowledge (FRE 602)
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Counsel is testifying; Leading;
Counsel is literally reading a
document into the record
Leading (FRE 611); Compound;
Counsel is testifying
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 80l(c));
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
reading the document into the
record
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 80l(c));
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
reading the document into the
record
Attorney-Client Privilege (FRE
501)
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
reading the document into the
record; Argumentative; Counsel
is testifying (as to what
someone "had to do"); Asked

s
s
s

s

,r, �"

'l \I· 2,3

- 2.12 ./

o"l'.1

i (' (¼I-

212:1

-212:1�
a,,1'.)

0
0

0

0
0

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 33 of 51

1
2
3

'Witness Name

Page/Line
Start

Page/Line
End

221:16

222:2

222:6
222:12

222:9
223:12

4
5
6
7
8
9

226:18

228:18

229:8
241:16

229:12
242:11

243:16

244:4

244:12

244:19

244:22

246:1

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

247: 11

248:7

26
27
28

249:3

249:10
107

Objection/Res:Qonse
and answered (FRE 611(a))
Asked and answered (FRE
61l(a)); Leading (FRE 611);
Counsel is testifying (as to what
is clear); Compound
None
Leading (FRE 611); Asked and
Answered (FRE 61l(a)); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 80l(c));
Counsel read another provision
into the record.
Leading (FRE 611); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 80l(c));
Speculation/ Lack of Personal
Knowledge (FRE 602)
Leading (FRE 611)
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
reading the document into the
record
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
reading the document into the
record; Compound
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 80l(c));
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
reading the document into the
record
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 80l(c));
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
reading the document into the
record; Speculation/ Lack of
Personal Knowledge (FRE 602)
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 80l(c));
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
reading the document into the
record; Speculation/ Lack of
Personal Knowledge (FRE 602)
None

0

0
0
(J

0
0

0
0
0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8
9

10

11

12
13

14

15

16

17
18
19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Page/Line
Start
254:8

255:17

256:25

257:23

263:1

264:12
265:12
265:20
266:24

269:4

270:10
270:22
272:24

273:9
273:25
274:17
274:24
277:7

Page/Line
End
255:12

256:13

257:18

258:5

263:23

264:24
265:15
265:25
267:24
270:2

270:13
271:17
272:24
273:17
274:3
274:19

274:25

277:13

Counsel is arguing with
�
himself; Speculation/ Lack of
Personal Knowledge (FRE
602); Best Evidence (FRE
1001-FRE 1003); Hearsay (FRE
80l(c)); Leading (FRE 611)
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 80l(c));
Leading (FRE 611); Asked and
Answered (FRE 611(a))
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 80l(c));
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
reading the document into the
record
Argumentative; Leading (FRE
611)
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
reading the document into the
record
None
Asked and Answered (FRE
61l(a))
Compound; Leading
0
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Leading (FRE 611);
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Leading (FRE 611);
None
0
Leading (FRE 611);
No question designated, answer
is non-sensical without a
question.
Leading (FRE 611)
0
Leading (FRE 611)
0
Leading (FRE 611); Vague as to
whom Counsel is referencing
No question, no answer, not
evidence
Leading (FRE 611); Asked and
Answered (FRE 61l(a))

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 34 of 51

\-Vitness Name

108

Objection/Res12onse

i

(' t'><'-(
2�1i·
z5'f:1c

;

OV' I J

0
Ci

0

-

s

0
-

s
s

s

0

,1' pi.r�
zc;t,: 12. i:;11: S
Ol'\IJ

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 35 of 51

Witness Name
2

Page/Line
Start
279:9

Page/Line
End
280:2

3

281:5

281:12

4

281:17

282: l

282:5

282:6

282:12

284:2

284:9

285:22

313:21
314:21
316:5
316:19
318:14

314:3
314:23
316:11
316:23
319:18

16

321:8
323:1

321:15
323:3

17

323:12

323:20

324:25
326:14

325:4
327:6

328:1

328:25

22

329:5

329:14

23

330:17
341:23

330:20
342:10

343:12
344:21

344:13
346:6

348:20

349:4

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

18
19
20
21

24
25
26
27
28

109

Objection/Res12onse

s
s

Leading (FRE 611); Asked and
Answered (FRE 61 l(a))
Attorney-Client Privilege (FRE
501)
Attorney-Client Privilege (FRE
501)
Attorney-Client Privilege (FRE
501)
Attorney-Client Privilege (FRE
501); Best Evidence (FRE
1001-FRE 1003); Hearsay (FRE
80 l (c)); Leading (FRE 611);
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 801(c));
Leading (FRE 611);
None
None
None
Leading (FRE 611)
Leading (FRE 611); Hearsay
(FRE 801(c)); Speculation/
Lack of Personal Knowledge
(FRE 602)
0
Leading (FRE 611)
Vague (as to which conference
C)
call)
Compound; Attorney-Client
Privilege (FRE 501)
Leading (FRE 611)
Counsel is testifying;
Compound; Attorney-Client
Privilege (FRE 501)
Leading (FRE 611); Asked and
Answered (FRE 611(a))
Asked and Answered (FRE
�
61 l (a)); Leading (FRE 611)
0
Leading (FRE 611)
Vague (as to what samples and
what lab); Speculation/ Lack of
Knowledge (FRE 602)
Leading (FRE 611); Compound
Leading (FRE 611); Speculation
/ Lack of Personal Knowledge
(FRE 602);
Leading (FRE 611 ); Compound;

s

s
0
0

-

0
0

s

0
0

0

0
0

0

0

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 36 of 51

1

Witness Name

352:19

353:10

353:25

354:11

356:7

356:24

357: 12

357:21

358:7

360:5

361:21

366:5

366:12

367:19

368:15

372:9

3

Page/Line
End

349:25

2

Page/Line
Start

373:23

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Richard Kim

23
24
25
26
27
28

Daniel
Weatherbie

Al1 pages
and lines
other than
those
designated
for trial by
Defendants

Objection/ResQonse
Assumes Facts Not In Evidence
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
testifying (as to what the
witness wants to do);
Compound
Counsel is testifying (as to his
understanding of agency
principles); Speculation/ Lack
of Personal Knowledge (FRE
602)
Leading (FRE 611); Speculation
I Lack of Personal Knowledge
(FRE 602)
Speculation/ Lack of Personal
Knowledge (FRE 602);
Compound; Leading (FRE 611)
Leading (FRE 611); Speculation
I Lack of Personal Knowledge
(FRE 602); Assumes Facts Not
In Evidence
Leading (FRE 611); Compound;
Asked and answered (FRE
61l(a))
Compound; Asked and
Answered (FRE 611(a))
Counsel is testifying; Leading;
Seeks improper lay opinion
(FRE 701); Asked and
Answered (FRE 611(a))
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 80l(c));
Leading (FRE 611); Speculation
I Lack or Personal Knowledge
(FRE 602)
Relevancy (FRE 402),
Confusion, Prejudice (FRE
403), Hearsay (801 and 802),
Speculation (FRE 602);
Improper testimony by
Plaintiffs' counsel

7:7

7:17

8:6

8:13
110

No objection.

0
0
0
0

0
0

0

0
0

0

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 37 of 51

1

\Vitness Name

Page/Line
Start
349:25

353:25

354:11

356:7

356:24

357:12

357:21

358:7

360:5

361:21

366:5

366:12

367:19

368:15

372:9

3

352:19

353:10

2

Page/Line
End

373:23

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Richard Kim

23

lr
(

24
25
26
27
28

Daniel
\.'Veatherbie

All pages
and lines
� ,;
other than ;)
those
designated
for trial by
Defendants

Objection/Res�onse
Assumes Facts Not In Evidence
Leading (FRE 611); Counsel is
testifying (as to what the
witness wants to do);
Compound
Counsel is testifying (as to his
understanding of agency
principles); Speculation/ Lack
of Personal Knowledge (FRE
602)
Leading (FRE 611); Speculation
/ Lack of Personal Knowledge
(FRE 602)
Speculation/ Lack of Personal
Knowledge (FRE 602);
Compound; Leading (FRE 611)
Leading (FRE 611); Speculation
/ Lack of Personal Knowledge
(FRE 602); Assumes Facts Not
In Evidence
Leading (FRE 611); Compound;
Asked and answered (FRE
61 l(a))
Compound; Asked and
Answered (FRE 61 l(a))
Counsel is testifying; Leading;
Seeks improper lay opinion
(FRE 701); Asked and
Answered (FRE 61 l(a))
Best Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003); Hearsay (FRE 80l(c));
Leading (FRE 611); Speculation
/ Lack or Personal Knowledge
(FRE 602)
Relevancy (FRE 402),
Confusion, Prejudice (FRE
403), Hearsay (801 and 802),
Speculation (FRE 602);
Improper testimony by
Plaintiffs' counsel

7:7

7:17

8:6

8:13
110

No objection.

0

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 38 of 51

Page/Line
Start
11:10
13:9
14:9
21:19
23:12
27:23
31:22

4
5
6

36:3

36:17

3

35:7

35:18

2

Page/Line
End
12:5
14:1
20:20
22:16
26:2
29:7
34:17

35:5

Witness Name

53:13

54:12
55:10
60:3

55:2
59:12
66:4

67:3
68:4
68:20

67:24
68:10
72:5

74:24
76:12

75:16
76:16

76:24
77:20
79:8
80:8
81:23
83:8
87:13
88:25

77:7
78:21
79:23
81:10
82:11
86:25
88:15
90:4

7
8
9
10
11
12

$ epCQf)fI

13
14
15
16
17
18
19

o: 38 r� -1/t/d'!tl

t./1 :�s-5 1; I
.51- � -.5 3: 3

s� -1--o lt"3', y-

vq,

(p<-/ .' � /3-

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

111

Objection/Res12onse

0
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
I , J()Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
i 1q;)D­
No objection.
O.)[J
No objection.
Relevancy (FRE 402); Improper
Lay Opinion (FRE 701)
Improper Expert Opinion (FRE {}
702)
Relevancy (FRE 402); Improper
Lay Opinion (FRE 701)
Improper Expert Opinion (FRE
702)
Relevancy (FRE 402); Improper
Lay Opinion (FRE 70 l)
Improper Expert Opinion (FRE
702); Calls for legal conclusion
37:2- 38:17 Relevance (FRE
402); Witness lacks personal
knowledge (FRE 602);
speculation {FRE 602)
No objection.
No objection.
63:8- 64:8 Hearsay (FRE 801,
802); witness lacks personal
knowledge (FRE 601)
No objection.
No objection.
69:13-70:19 Hearsay (FRE
801, 802); witness lacks
personal knowledge (FRE 601); 6
71:4- 72:5 Hearsay (FRE 801,
802), Relevancy (FRE 402)
0
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Hearsay (FRE 801, 802),
(J
Relevancy (FRE 402)
No objection.
No objection.
No objection.
No objection.
No objection.
Hearsay (FRE 801, 802)
0
No objection.
No objection.

s,
o

s

s

-�

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 39 of 51

Witness Name
2

Page/Line
Start
91:2

Page/Line
End
91:17

3

92:4

94:15

4

96:7
97:6
98:17

96:13
97:13
99:11

99:22
106:13
107:6

104:10
106:16
107:18

108:12
109: 19

108:17
110:21

111:15

111:24

11:8
14:6
14:11
14:22
15:11
17:6
19:19
23:5
31:11
46:5
48:4
50:18
51:4
51:16
52:2
57:8
58:21
67:2

11:17
14:9
14:17
15:1
16:22
17:8
19:22
23:19
31:15
46:24
48:10
51:1
51:7
51:23
52:25
57:20
58:24
67:6

68:17

69:4

69:13
70:23

70:8
71:15

72:17
72:25

72:20
73:10

5
6
7
8
9
10
11

S:. 110�15-.;2..I

O: �>+-

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Craig Pasco

112

0 bjection/Res�onse
Relevancy (FRE 402);
completeness
92:4- 93:18 Relevancy (FRE
402); speculation (FRE 602)
No objection.
No objection.
98:17- 99:2 Hearsay (FRE 801,
802)
No objection.
No objection.
Witness lacks personal
knowledge (FRE 602);
speculation (FRE 602)
No objection.
Hearsay (FRE 801, 802);
speculation (FRE 602); leading
(FRE 611); asked & answ ered
No objection.
No objection.
No objection.
No objection.
No objection.
No objection.
No objection.
No objection.
No objection.
No objection.
No objection.
No objection.
Hearsay (FRE 801(c))
Hearsay (FRE 80l(c))
No objection.
No objection.
No objection.
Hearsay (FRE 80l(c))
Hearsay (FRE 80l(c));
Foundation
Hearsay (FRE 80l(c));
Foundation
Hearsay (FRE 80l(c))
Hearsay (FRE 80l(c));
Foundation
No objection.
No objection.

0

0
0

1)

0

0
0
D
0

0

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 40 of 51

1

\-Vitness Name

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

--

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Page/Line
Start
74:12
74:24
75:22
77:12
78:14
79:3
79:7
79:22
80:4
81:3
82:5
82:8
82:22
83:23
86:5

Page/Line
End
74:20
75:15
77:6
78:4
78:16
79:4
79:13
79:24
80:24
82:3
82:6
82:15
83:16
84:1
86:25

87:3
87:10
87:16
88:23
89:5
90:4
91:5
91:20
92:8
99:1
101:25

87:8
87:12
88:13
89:3
89:11
91:1
91:15
92:3
93:9
99:21
102:16

Objection/ResQonse
No objection.
No objection.
No objection.
No objection.
No objection.
No objection.
No objection.
No objection.
No objection.
No objection.
No objection.
No objection.
No objection.
No answer
Incomplete question; Hearsay
(FRE 801(c))
No objection.
No objection.
Hearsay (FRE 801(c))
No objection.
No objection.
Hearsay (FRE 80l(c))
Hearsay (FRE 80l(c))
No objection.
Hearsay (FRE 80l(c))
No answer.
No objection.

0
{)

0

0
0
0

\

Defendant objects to Plaintiffs 1 Counter-designations as follows:
Witness
Name

Page/Line
Start

Page/Line
End

Objection

Ivy
Greenberg

19:2

19:6

24:14
38:12

25:9
38:13

39:2

39:13

63:6

63:10

69:7

71:7

Answer lacks context without
reference to remainder of
transcri t
Hearsa (FRE 801)
Question and Answer lacks
context without 38:3-11
Speculation/ Lack of
Knowled e FRE 602)
No Question designated,
Counsel is coachin the witness.
Hearsa (FRE 801); Best

113

0
0

s

0

s

s

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16
17

18

19

20
21

22

23
24

25

26
27

28

72:2

76:1

59:9

60:5

159:22

160:6

72:17
76:3

59:21
60:5

160:2

160:9

(2) Plaintiffs object to Defendant's depositions as follows:
Witness
Page/Line
Page/Line
Name
Start
End
Daniel
25:4
2577
Weatherbie
42:5
43:11

52: 13
55:1
55:11

57:10

58:6
59:4
59:20
60:9
60:24
62:4
67:14

68:2

42:8
43:23

54:16
55:2
56:16

57:21

58:23
59:11
60:5
60:17
61:11
62:14
67:23

68:22

Evidence (FRE 1001-1003)
Hearsay (FRE 801); Best
Evidence (FRE 1001-FRE
1003)
No Question designated,
Counsel is coaching the witness.

Designation cuts off the
witness's answer at 59:22.
This answer is in response to
Counsel's coaching rather than
a question.
This is not testimony. This is a
back and forth between
counsel. It is not evidence.
This is not testimony. This is a
back and forth between
counsel. It is not evidence.

End line should be 25f or � 0
Relevancy (FRE 402),
Cumulative (FRE 403), and all ✓
objections as follow herein
Speculation (FRE 602)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
0
Speculation (FRE 602)
Completeness (FRE 106)
0
Completeness (FRE 106)
0
Relevancy (FRE 402)
0
Lay Witness Opinion (FRE 701)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Lay Witness Opinion (FRE 701)
Completeness (FRE 106)
Completeness (FRE 106)
Completeness (FRE 106)
Completeness (FRE 106)
Completeness (FRE 106)
Completeness (FRE 106)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
0
Immaterial (FRE 403)
Prejudicial (FRE 403)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Immaterial (FRE 403)

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 41 of 51

John
Panico

114

Objection

s

s

s
.)

1-J

r

/s_

0

B

V

0

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24
25

26

27

28

69:1

69:5

80:8
88:25
99:3

103:12
13:1

22:1
22:23
24:1

62:16

66:5

71:8
75:14

15:8

16:15
20:21
39:19

58:24
61:11
62:5
157:12

69:2

69:6

80:18
89:22

100:14
103:21

13:23

22:20
23:9
24:6
63:3

66:21

71:25
75:25

15:20

16:23
21:1
41:3

59:8
61:24
62:8
159:19

Prejudicial (FRE 403)
Speculation (FRE 602)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Immaterial (FRE 403)
Prejudicial (FRE 403)
Speculation (FRE 602)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Immaterial (FRE 403)
Prejudicial (FRE 403)
Speculation (FRE 602)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Speculation (FRE 602)
Lay Witness Opinion (FRE 701)
Speculation (FRE 602)
Lay Witness Opinion (FRE 70 l)
Speculation (FRE 602)
Lay Witness Opinion (FRE 701)

No objections

Relevancy (FRE 402)
Foundation (FRE 901)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
No answer
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Speculation (FRE 602)
Hearsay (FRE 801)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Foundation (FRE 901)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Foundation (FRE 901)
Relevancy (FRE 402)

Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Immaterial (FRE 403)
Prejudicial (FRE 403)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 42 of 51

Richard
Kim
Ivy
Greenberg

John
Panico

115

D

0
0
0
0

0

0

s
s

0
0
�

0

0

s
0
0

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 43 of 51

1
2

0
161
1-------+--- - _ :4 _ --+---161:25------l-- Relevanc_.___,_FRE 402)� ---------j
_
- - - _ _
0
RE 40
R-el-evanc F ___ 2)
167:23
167:17
Plaintiffs object to Defendant's Counter-designations as follows:

3
4
5

Witness Name
Kevin Owens

10

135:17
153:10
157:12

Objection
No objection
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Form
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Speculation (F RE 602)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Foundation (FRE 901);
Form
Relevancy (FRE 402)
No objection
No objection

157:13
160:21
164:10
181:24
194:14
196:5
204:3
205:13
219:19
220:19
221:2
222:2
253:16
258:1
267:3

9

131:4
132:5

134:12
153:3
157:9

8

106:14
110:8

130:24
131:22

7

Page/Line End
10:22
28:19
35:9
104:10

104:22
110:2

6

Page/Line Start
10:7
28:7
34:12
104:3

158:14
161:7
164:15
182:11
196:2
196:9
204:9
205:15
220:3
220:23
221:5
222:15
254:7
263:1
267:16

Foundation (FRE 901)
No objection
No objection
No objection
INo objection
No objection
No objection
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection

4:8

4:18

No objection

10:25
18:8
22:13
30:5
35:13

10:25
18:14
22:14
30:9
36:13

No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Douglas W.
Neumann

116

0
0

0
0
0
0

0
D
0

0

0

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 44 of 51

Witness Name
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Page/Line Start
36:15
36:20
48:19
49:15

Page/Line End
36:16
36:25
48:25
49:25

50:3
53:3
55:14
68:5
70:8
70:10
71:14
74:6
75:15
75:22
86:16
89:1
94:22
95:3
95:22
96:23

50:8
53:6
55:19
68:8
70:8
70:12
72:3
74:17
75:19
75:25
86:25
89:3
95:2
95:9
96:1
97:6

97:11

97:15

97:17

97:19

98:23

99:4

101:1
101:9
101:15
105:25
106:11
106:17
107:18
113:17

101:7
101:11
101:15
106:1
106:11
106:17
107:22
113:19

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

117

Objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
Hearsay (FRE 801 and
802)
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
No objection
No objection
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Improper Lay
Opinion/Ultimate
Issue (FRE 701),
Improper Expert
Opinion (FRE 702)
Improper Lay
Opinion/Ultimate
Issue (FRE 701),
Improper Expert
Opinion (FRE 702)
Improper Lay
Opinion/Ultimate
Issue (FRE 701),
Improper Expe1t
Opinion (FRE 702)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
Relevancy (FRE 402)

0

0
0

0

0
0
0

s

s
0
0
0

0

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 45 of 51

1

\-Vitness Name

Page/Line Start
118:16

Page/Line End
Objection
118:17
No objection
Improper Lay
Opinion/Ultimate
122:17
Issue (FRE 701),
Improper Expert
Opinion (FRE 702)
133:15
Relevancy (FRE 402)
136:9
Foundation (FRE 901)
136:17
Speculation (FRE 602)
146:25
Relevancy (FRE 402)
147:25
No objection
156:18
Foundation (FRE 901)
159:2
No objection
167:8
No objection
187:19
No objection
195:16
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Hearsay (FRE 801 and
802); Improper Lay
198:24
Opinion/Ultimate Issue
(FRE 701)
211:12
Relevancy (FRE 402)
211:22
Relevancy (FRE 402)
211:24
No objection
239:8
No objection

2
3

122:6

4
133:8
136:4
136:12
146:23
147:13
156:7
158:24
167:4
187:14
195:8

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

198: 15

13
211 :8
211:14
211:24
239:7

14
15
16
Brad Becker

19

11:21
16:6
17: 10
24:15

11:25
17:6
17:23
24:18

20

31:16

31:17

21

31:23

32:2

22

32:12

32:15

23

35:1

35:7

25

37:2

37:22

26

38:5
38:8
54:1
54:3

38:5
38:16
54:1
54:3

17
18

24

27
28

118

!No objection
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
INo objection
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Foundation (FRE 901)
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Foundation (FRE 901)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Improper Expert
Opinion (FRE 702)
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Speculation (FRE 602);
Form
No objection
No objection
INo objection
No objection

0

5

0
0
5
0

s
0

s
s
0

D

0
0
0
0

0

-

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 46 of 51

70:4

70:9

4

72:17

73:8

5

79:16
82:3
82:7
82:25

79:18
82:4
82:21
83:2

84:9

84:13

84:15
92:1
93:12
101:16
101:22
109:6

84:17
92:2
93:13
101:17
102:7
109:13

112:20

113:4

14

130:6

130:12

15

143:8
143:14
144:2
149:21
152:2
154:21
154:24
156:19
157:14
163:21
164:2
167:8
186: 10
186:13

143:9
143:15
144:7
150:1
152:3
154:22
155:3
156:24
157:19
163:23
164:7
167:13
186:10
186:15

Objection
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Foundation (FRE 901);
Improper Expe11
Opinion (FRE 702)
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Foundation (FRE 901)
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
Foundation (FRE 901);
Fmm
Foundation (FRE 901)
No objection
No objection
Relevancy (FRE 402)
No objection
No objection
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Foundation (FRE 901)
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Foundation (FRE 901);
Fo1m
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Foundation (FRE 901)
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
No objection
Relevancy (FRE 402)
No objection
Relevancy (FRE 402)

11:7
12:25
14:21
18:2

No objection
No objection
No objection
Relevancy (FRE 402)

l

Witness Name

2

Page/Line Start

Page/Line End

3

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Richard Kim
Craig Pasco

9:6
12:23
14:17
17:9

0

0

0

0
0
0
C)

0
0

0
0

NIA

26

D

27
28

119

0

-

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 47 of 51

Witness Name
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

S:

& 3 ·. i-zv

Page/Line Start
19:25
23:2
23:20
26:12
27:6
33:19
38:20
46:1
47:3
48:11
51:8
53:8
54:22
57:25
59:4
60:19

Page/Line End
20:17
23:4
24:23
26:21
27:18
34:13
38:23
46:4
47:25
48:22
51:15
53:17
57:1
58:20
60:12
61:14

61 :21

63:24

64:5

65:8

16

65:11
66:5
67:7

65:24
67:1
67:17

17

67:23

68:13

18
19

69:5
70:9
71:16

69:10
70:21
72:16

20

73:14

74:11

75:16
77:7
78:5
78:17
78:24
79:5
79:14
80:25
82:16
83:17
84:2

75:21
77:11
78:13
78:18
79:1
79:6
79:21
81:2
82:21
83:22
86:1

12
13
14
15

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

0. (l,S t"

120

Objection
Relevancy (FRE 402)
0
No objection
Relevancy (FRE 402)
0
Relevancy (FRE 402)
0
Relevancy (FRE 402)
s
Relevancy (FRE 402)
0
Relevancy (FRE 402)
0
No objection
Relevancy (FRE 402)
0
Relevancy (FRE 402)
0
Relevancy (FRE 402)
V
Form
0
Speculation (FRE 602)
0
Speculation (FRE 602)
0
0
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Speculation (FRE 602)
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Foundation (FRE 901)
This is not testimony. This
is a back and forth between
counsel. It is not evidence.
0
Relevancy (FRE 402)
0
Form
D
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402);
0
Foundation (FRE 901)
Foundation (FRE 901)
{)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
0
Relevancy (FRE 402)
0
This is not testimony. This
is a back and forth between
counsel. It is not evidence.
D
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
0
Relevancy (FRE 402)
0
Relevancy (FRE 402)
0
Relevancy (FRE 402)
0
Relevancy (FRE 402)
0
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
No objection
No objection
No objection

s

s

s

D
D

121

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 48 of 51

1

Witness Name

2
3
4

Page/Line Start
87:9
89:4
89:12
91:16
93:10

5

94:22

6

96:19

7

99:22

8
9

Daniel
Weatherbie

30:2

10
11

36:10

12
13

78:22

14

82:12

15
16

23:12

\,Vade Ledbetter

20

11:7
22:14
31:11
31:19
32:22
34:7
39:22

21

43:22

22

44:14

23

47:1
47:9
50:15
56:6
56:22
57:10
57:20
65:2
73:13

17
18
19

24
25
26
27
28

Page/Line End
87:9
89:4
90:3
91:19
93:15

99:22

Objection
No objection
No objection
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Foundation (FRE 901)
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Foundation (FRE 901)
No objection

24:8

No objection

96:12
98:20

30:20

36:13
79:7
82:25
11:10
24:4
31:16
31:21
33:3
34:14
39:25
44:1
44:20
47:4
47:15
50:22
56:9
57:6
57:15
57:22
65:6
74:8

Relevancy (FRE 402);
Foundation (FRE 901)
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Foundation (FRE 901);
Improper Expert
Opinion (FRE 702);
Form
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Hearsay (FRE 80 I and
802); Non-responsive to
!question
No objection
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
No objection
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Form
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Form
Relevancy (FRE 402)
No objection
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)

0
0

0
0

�

0

s
0

V
0

s
s
0

0

0
0
0
0

s

0

0

0

0

s

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 49 of 51
Witness Name

Page/Line Start

Page/Line End

86:5

86:11

88:10

88:17

89:20

89:24

98:2

98:8

98:24

99:2

101:19

102:9

102:11

102:22

107:19

107:25

108:10

109:1

109:6

109:15

110:2

110:5

113:6

113:10

21

114:6

114:19

22

125:11

125:13

23

128:3

128:4

128:6

128:15

128:20

129:1

133:2

133:20

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

24
25
26
27
28

-

122

Objection
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Foundation (FRE 901);
Form
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Foundation (FRE 901);
Fonn
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Foundation (FRE 901)
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Foundation (FRE 901);
Fo1m
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Foundation (FRE 901);
Form
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Foundation (FRE 901);
Form
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Foundation (FRE 901);
Form
Hearsay (FRE 801 and
802); Foundation (FRE
901)
Hearsay (FRE 801 and
802); Foundation (FRE
901)
Hearsay (FRE 801 and
802); Foundation (FRE
901)
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Foundation (FRE 901)
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Form
Relevancy (FRE 402);
F01m
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Hearsay (FRE 801 and
802)
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Hearsay (FRE 801 and
802)
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Hearsay (FRE 801 and
802)
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Foundation (FRE 901);

0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0

0
0
0
0
0

0

0

0
0

0

2

3

5
7

10

11

12

13

14
15

16

17

18

19
20

21
22

23

24

25

26
27

28

4

6

8

9

133:24

134:15

134: 18
135:1
135:11
137:14
175:20
182:4

134:19
135:7
135:21
137: 19
176:6
182:4

187:18

187:24

194:2

194:17

195:2

195:14

195:19

196:4

196:10

196:13

214:22

214:24

216:9

216:12

216:23

216:25

244:20

244:21

246:2

246:4

263:24

263:25

265:16

265:19

268:25

269:3

272:9

272: 17

Objection
and Hearsay (FRE 801
and 802)
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Foundation (FRE 901);
and Hearsay (FRE 801
and 802)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Foundation (FRE 901)
No objection
Relevancy (FRE 402)
No objection
Foundation/Authenticity
(FRE 901); Hearsay
FRE 801 and 802)
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Hearsay (FRE 801 and
802)
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Foundation (FRE 901);
Hearsay (FRE 801 and
802)
Foundation (FRE 901);
Hearsay (FRE 801 and
802)
Foundation (FRE 901);
Hearsay (FRE 801 and
802)
No objection
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Improper Lay Opinion
(FRE 701)
No objection
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Foundation (FRE 901)
Fo1m
Hearsay (FRE 801 and
802)
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Foundation (FRE 901);
Hearsay (FRE 801 and
802), Form
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Form
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Foundation (FRE 901);

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 50 of 51
Witness Name

Page/Line Start

Page/Line End

123

0
0

0

0
0

0
0
0
0

s
0

-

0
0

0

0

0
C)

Case 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK Document 217 Filed 03/14/22 Page 51 of 51

Witness Name
2

Page/Line Start

Page/Line End

273:9

273:17

274:4

274:8

275:1

275:8

275:19
277:14

275:23
277:17

280:3

280:10

285:3

285:4

285:7

286:2

18

314:4
327:7
334:16
356:8

314:11
327:21
335:2
356:16

19

362:3

362:18

20

366:13

367:5

21

368:24

368:25

22

369:18

369:23

370:1

370:6

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

23
24
25
26
27

-

VII.
The following witnesses may be called by the parties at trial:
(a) Provide names and addresses of plaintiffs witnesses.

28
124

Objection
Form; Prejudicial (FRE
403)
No objection
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Foundation (FRE 901);
Form; Prejudicial (FRE
403); Improper Expert
Opinion (FRE 702)
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Foundation (FRE 901);
Form; Prejudicial (FRE
403); Improper Expert
Opinion (FRE 702)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Foundation (FRE 901);
Prejudicial (FRE 403);
Hearsay (FRE 801 and
802)
No objection
285:7 -285:22 No
objection ..
-285:23 - 286:2
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Relevancy (FRE 402)
Foundation (FRE 901)
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Form
Relevancy (FRE 402);
Form
No objection
Hearsay (FRE 801 and
802)
Hearsay (FRE 801 and
802)
..........

-

s

s
s

-

0

0

s

0
0

s

s

-

0
0

(
,1'1 Oil
r

.

'' I �i..n�
,.,C:jj.1 11
oq.«
u