U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Operture, Inc.
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 10 Magistrate Judge Koppe's Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to enter default in favor of U.S. Bank Trust, and against Operture. U.S. Bank Trust is ORDERED to file a proposed order and judgment accompanied by a supplemental memorandum of points and authorities within 10 days of the date of this order. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 4/21/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF9
Master Participation Trust,
Case No.: 2:16-cv-02938-JAD-NJK
Order Adopting Report and
Recommendation [ECF No. 10],
Ordering Default be Entered Against
Defendant, and Ordering Supplemental
U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., brings three claims for relief against Operture, Inc.: (1) quiet title and
declaratory relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2201, NRS 30.010 et seq., and NRS 40.010; (2) preliminary
injunction; and (3) unjust enrichment.1 Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe recommends that default
judgment be entered against Operture for failing to retain counsel. The Report and Recommendation
was entered March 24, 2017. Objections were due April 7, 2017. “[N]o review is required of a
magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.” Schmidt v. Johnstone,
263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003). See also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985);
United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Operture has filed no objections
to the Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, and with good cause appearing,
It is hereby ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Koppe’s Report and Recommendation [ECF
No. 10] is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED.
It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to enter default in favor of
U.S. Bank Trust, and against Operture.
U.S. Bank Trust is ORDERED to file a proposed order and judgment accompanied by a
ECF No. 1 at 9–12. Technically, “preliminary injunction” is not a claim for relief, it’s a remedy.
supplemental memorandum of points and authorities discussing the scope of relief legally available
and addressing the seven factors outlined by the Ninth Circuit in Eitel v. McCool.2 If U.S. Bank
Trust seeks fees and costs, U.S. Bank Trust is further ORDERED to submit a separate motion for
fees and costs that complies with Local Rule 54-14. U.S. Bank Trust is ORDERED to submit all
filings within 10 days of the date of this order.
DATED April 21, 2017.
Jennifer A. Dorsey
United States District Judge
The seven factors outlined in Eitel include: (1) the possibility of prejudice to the plaintiff; (2) the merits
of plaintiff’s substantive claim; (3) sufficiency of the complaint; (4) the sum of money at stake in the
action; (5) the possibility of a dispute concerning material facts; (6) whether the default was due to
excusable neglect; and (7) the strong policy underlying the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure favoring
decisions on the merits. Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471–72 (9th Cir. 1986) .
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?