Yousif v. The Venetian Casino Resort, LLC et al

Filing 167

ORDER Granting 166 Stipulation for Extension of Time Re: 163 Motion for Protective Order. Replies due by 4/17/2020. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 4/8/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)

Case 2:16-cv-02941-RFB-NJK Document 167 Filed 04/08/20 Page 1 of 2

1

7

THIERMAN BUCK, LLP
Mark R. Thierman, Esq., Bar No. 8285
Joshua D. Buck, Esq., Bar No. 12187
Leah L. Jones, Esq., Bar No. .13161
7287 Lakeside Drive
Reno, Nevada 89511
Tel. [phone]
Fax [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

8

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Yousif and Walker

9

DLA PIPER LLP
Mary C. Dollarhide, admitted pro hac vice
4365 Executive Drive, Suite 1100
San Diego, CA 82121
Tel, [phone]
Fax [phone]
[e-mail]

2
3
4
5
6

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK, &
STEWART, PC.
Molly M. Rezac, Nev. Bar No. 7435
50 West Liberty Street, Suite 920
Reno, Nevada 89501
Tel. [phone]
Fax [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant The Venetian Casino Resort, LLC

19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

20

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

MUSTAFA YOUSIF and SHARONE WALKER )
on behalf of themselves and all others similarly )
situated,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
THE VENETIAN CASINO RESORT, LLC;
)
LAS VEGAS SANDS, CORP and DOES 1
)
through 50, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)

CASE NO. 2:16-cv-02941-RFB-NJK
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE REPLY
IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE
ORDER
(First Request)

1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EOT OF PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY I/S/O PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case 2:16-cv-02941-RFB-NJK Document 167 Filed 04/08/20 Page 2 of 2

1

Pursuant to Local Rules (“LR”) IA 6-1 Plaintiffs MUSTAFA YOUSIF and SHARONE

2

WALKER (“Plaintiffs”), by and through their counsel of record THIERMAN BUCK, LLP, and

3

Defendant THE VENETIAN CASINO RESORT, LLC (“Defendant”), by and through its counsel

4

of record DLA PIPER, LLC, and OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK, & STEWART, P.C.,

5

hereby request and stipulate for a seven-calendar day extension of time, up to an including Friday,

6
7

April 17, 2020, to submit Plaintiffs’ Reply in support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Protective Order.
This is Plaintiffs’ first request for an extension of time for Plaintiffs’ to file their Reply.
Plaintiffs request this extension of time due to issues related to the novel coronavirus

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

(COVID-19). This Stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purposes of undue burden or
delay.
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
Dated this 7 day of April, 2020.
THIERMAN BUCK, LLP

Dated this 7 day of April 2020.
DLA PIPER LLP

/s/ leah L. Jones
Mark R. Thierman, Esq., Bar No. 8285
Joshua D. Buck, Esq., Bar No. 12187
Leah L. Jones, Esq., Bar No. .13161
7287 Lakeside Drive
Reno, Nevada 89511

/s/ Mary C. Dollarhide
Mary C. Dollarhide, admitted pro hac vice
4365 Executive Drive, Suite 1100
San Diego, CA 82121

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

19
20

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK, &
STEWART, P.C.
/s/Molly M. Rezac
Molly M. Rezac, Nev. Bar No. 7435
50 West Liberty Street, Suite 920
Reno, Nevada 89501
Attorneys for Defendant

21
22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED:

24

26

________________________________
, 2020
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
______________________________________

27

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
DATED this 8th day of April, 2020.

25

DATED:

28
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULING